Skip to main content
Log in

Availability of Records in an Outpatient Preanesthetic Evaluation Clinic

  • Published:
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective. Despite efforts to develop electronic access to medical records, there are few data on availability of past evaluations. Typical analyses assess only availability of paper charts. We studied the availability of prior internal and external medical documentation in the preanesthetic clinic of our tertiary teaching institution, which has had access to hospital-wide electronic records for five years. Methods. Residents and clerks answered questions on availability of desired pre-existing records either in a physical chart delivered to our clinic by computer terminal, at the start of the physician interview, and on later success in obtaining desired records not available at start of interview. Patient interview lengths were calculated. Results. 397 responses from 19-9-96 through 25-10-96 were available after 718 patient encounters. The surgeon's history & physical was unavailable in 11%. For 114/397 patients (29%) the anesthesiologist desired more pre-existing information than was available in either paper or electronic format. For 32/397 patients (8%), the desired information resided outside the institution (“MISSING EXTERNAL”); for 89/397 (22%), it was within the institution (“MISSING INTERNAL”). Additional information was desired for 41% of ASA 3/4 patients, and for 23% of ASA 1/2 patients. Some or all of desired information was not found for 45% of MISSING INTERNAL, and for 78% (p = 0.12 NS) of MISSING EXTERNAL. MISSING EXTERNAL of any ASA status required significantly longer evaluations (70 ± 39 min) than even ASA 3/4 patients missing no information (51.4 ± 35.7 min, p 0.03). The surgeries of only eight patients (2%) were postponed in the preanesthetic evaluation clinic; half of the postponements were to obtain pre-existing records. Conclusions. Anesthesiologists retrieved, and added to the perioperative evaluation, information from previous encounters for 16% of patients. Despite our hospital-wide electronic records, internal information was missing for 22% of patients. Uneven deployment, and reliance on transcription may contribute to failures. A national electronic medical records system would benefit the 8% (one out of twelve) of outpatients missing external records identified in this study. For many patients, optimal medical understanding was not achieved during the planned preanesthetic evaluation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Grant, A, Deslisle E, Dubois S, Niyonsenga T, Bernier, R. Implementation of a province-wide computerized network in Quebec: the Famus Project. MD Computing 1995; 12(1): 45-49

    Google Scholar 

  2. Van Wingerde FJ, Schindler J, Kilbridge P, Szolovits P, Safran C, Rind D, Murphy S, Barnett GO, Kohane IS. Using HL7 and theWorldWideWeb for unifying patient databases. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 1996; Symposium Supplement: 643-647

  3. HIIT and HITECC projects, see: http://host.scra.org/hcteams.html

  4. http://sunsite.unc.edu/nii/NII-Executive-Summary.html

  5. Downey M, Mullersmann G, Andrews P. Electronic medical records: TheUF/Shands experience. Proceedings of the 1995 Southeastern Medical Informatics Conference. Available from the Internet at the following address: http:www.med.u£.edu/medinfo/smic95/abs10.html

  6. Gibby GL, Lemeer G, Jackson K. Use of data from a hospital online medical records system by physicians during preanesthetic evaluation. J Clin Monit 1996; 12: 405-408

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dambro MR, Weiss BD, MClure CL, Vuturo AF. An unsuccessful experience with computerized medical records in an academic medical center, J Med Educ 1988; 63(8): 617-23

    Google Scholar 

  8. McDonald CJ, tierney WM, Overhage JM, Martin DK, Wilson GA. The regenstrief medical record system: 20 years of experience in hospitals, clinics, and neighborhood health centers MD Comput 1992; 9(4): 206-217

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kerlin BD. Dissemination of COSTAR. Promises and realities. JMed Syst 1986; 10(3): 265-269

    Google Scholar 

  10. The Computer-based patient record: An essential technology for health care. Committee on improving the patient record, Division of Health Care Services, Institute of Medicine. National Academy Press, Washington DC (c) 1991; Table 1-1: 16-17

    Google Scholar 

  11. Tufo HM, Speidel JJ. Problems with medical records. Medical Care 1971; 9(6): 509-517

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hughes G. A case study in chart availability-University of Texas medical branch hospitals and clinics. Journal of AHIMA 1995; 66(10): 70-71

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wipf JE, Fihn SD, Callahan CM, Phillips CM. How residents spend their time in clinic and the effects of clerical support. Journal of General Medicine 1994; 9: 694-696

    Google Scholar 

  14. Porter CM. Oschsner Clinic QI Project: Day-of-admit surgery chart availability for the anesthesiologist. Journal of QualityAssurance 1990; 5: 26-29

    Google Scholar 

  15. Information infrastructure for healthcare, http://www.atp.nist.gov/wwww/press/iih9703.htm

  16. Gibby GL, Mark L. Drake JP. Scanning technology automates difficult airway registry. Society for technology in anesthesia, scientific demonstration (exhibit), january 26-28 1995, Scotttsdale Arizona

  17. Gibby GL, Paulus DA, Sirota DJ, Treloar RW, Jackson KI, Gravenstein JS, van der Aa JJ. Computerized preanesthetic evaluation results in additional abstracted comorbidity diagnoses. J Clin Monit 1997; 13: 35-41

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tierney WM, Miller ME, Overhage JM, McDonald CJ. Physician inpatient order writing on microcomputer workstations. Effects on resource utilization, JAMA 1993; 269(3): 379-383

    Google Scholar 

  19. Benoit RG, Cushing BM, Teitelbaum SD, VanWijngaarden MH, Canfield K. Direct physician entry of injury information and automated coding via a graphical user interface, in: proceedings. Sixteenth Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care. Bethesda, MD, American Medical Informatics Association, 1992: 787-788

  20. Salenius SA, Margolese Malin L, Tepper JE, Roseman J, Varia M, Hodge L. An electronic medical record system with direct data-entry and research capabilities. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1992; 24(2): 369-376

    Google Scholar 

  21. Jackson KI, Gibby GL, van der Aa JJ, Arroyo AA, Gravenstein JS. The efficiency of preoperative evaluation: A comparison of computerized and paper recording systems. J Clin Monit 1994; 10: 189-193

    Google Scholar 

  22. Gibby, GL. Anesthesia information-management systems: Their role in risk-versus cost-assessment and outcomes research. Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia 1997; 11(2) Suppl 1: 2-5

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gordon L. Gibby.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gibby, G.L., Schwab, W.K. Availability of Records in an Outpatient Preanesthetic Evaluation Clinic. J Clin Monit Comput 14, 385–391 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009971521520

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009971521520

Navigation