Skip to main content
Log in

The Liverpool Brief Assessment System for Communication Skills in the Making of Doctors

  • Published:
Advances in Health Sciences Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The teaching of clinical communication skills is gaining importance in medical schools. There is a need to design feasible assessments that are credible to faculty, students and the profession.

Aim: To design, and assess the reliability and validity of a new communication skills assessment system (the Liverpool Communication Skills Assessment Scale-LCSAS, and the Global Simulated Patient Rating Scale-GSPRS) for employment in OSCEs.

Participants: The first three annual intakes of students to the new medical curriculum at Liverpool Medical School (n = 600). Two further sub samples of 1st year (n = 60) and 2nd year students (n = 80) were included for further validation purposes in separate studies.

Statistical analysis: Intra class correlation coefficients and generalisability coefficients were employed to assess reliability of the LCSAS and GSPRS. Validity was tested by examining predicted relationships using pearson product moment correlation coefficients.

Results and conclusions: The LCSAS and GSPRS showed reasonable evidence for their reliability and validity although further work is recommended.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barbee, R. & Feldman, S. (1970). A three-year longitudinal study of the medical interview and its relationship to student performance in clinical medicine. Journal of Medical Education 45: 770-776.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boon, H. & Stewart, M. (1998). Patient-physician communication assessment instruments: 1986 to 1996 in review. Patient Education and Counselling 35: 161-176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, D., Colliver, J., Marcy, M., Fried, E. & Swartz, M. (1996). Psychometric properties of a standardized-patient checklist and rating-scale form used to assess interpersonal and communication skills. Academic Medicine 71(1 Suppl): S87-89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, C. & Mira, M. (1998). Who should assess medical students' communication skills: their academic teachers or their patients? Medical Education 32(4): 419-421.

    Google Scholar 

  • General Medical Council (1993). Tomorrow's Doctors: Recommendations on Undergraduate Medical Education. London.

  • Cunnington, J., Neville, A. & Norman, G. (1997). The risks of thoroughness: reliability and validity of global ratings and checklists on an OSCE. In A. Scherpbier, C. van der Vleuten, J. Rethans & A. van der Steeg (eds), Advances in Medical Education, pp. 143-145. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, B., Sweet, B. & Coman, G. (1993). Behavioural assessment of the effectiveness of a communication programme for medical students. Medical Education 27(4):344-350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finlay, I.G., Stott, N.C. & Kinnersley, P. (1995). The assessment of communication skills in palliative medicine: a comparison of the scores of examiners and simulated patients. Medical Education 29(6): 424-429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerrard, B. & Buzzell, M. (1980). User's Manual for the Behavioural Test of Interpersonal Skills for Health Professionals. Vancouver: Reston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruppen, L., Davis, W., Fitzgerald, J. & McQillan, M. (1997). Reliability, number of stations and examination length in an objective structured clinical examination. In A. Scherpbier, C. van der Vleuten, J. Rethans & A. van der Steeg (eds), Advances in Medical Education, pp. 441-442. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargie, O., Dickson, D., Boohan, M. & Hughes, K. (1998). A survey of communication skills training in UK schools of medicine: present practices and prospective proposals. Medical Education 32(1): 25-34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helfer, R. (1970). An objective comparison of the pediatric interviewing skills of freshman and senior medical students. Pediatrics 45: 623-627.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helfer, R. & Ealy, K. (1972). Observations of pediatric interviewing skills. A longitudinal and cross-sectional study. American Journal of Diseases in Children 123: 556-560.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphris, G. & Kaney, S. (In press a). The objective structured video exam for assessment of communication skills. Medical Education.

  • Humphris, G. & Kaney, S. (In press b). Examiner fatigue in communication skills OSCEs. Medical Education.

  • Joesbury, H., Bax, N. & Hannay, D. (1990). Communication skills and clinical methods: a new introductory course. Medical Education 24: 433-437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaney, S. & Humphris, G. (submitted). The evaluation of a communication skills course at Liverpool Medical School.

  • Keynan, A., Friedman, M. & Benbassat, J. (1987). Reliability of global rating scales in the assessment of clinical competence of medical students. Medical Education 21: 477-481.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinderman, P. & Humphris, G. (1995) The role of cognitive schemata in clinical communication skills training. Medical Education 29: 436-442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraan, H. & Crijnen, A. (1987). The Maastricht History-taking and Advice Checklist. Amsterdam: Lundbeck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norcini, J.J. (1999). Standards and reliability in evaluation: when rules of thumb don't apply. Academic Medicine 74: 1088-1090.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, G. (1993). On our selection: predictors of medical school success. Medical Journal of Australia 158(11): 747-751.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poole, A. & Sanson-Fisher, R. (1979). Understanding the patient: a neglected aspect of medical education. Social Science and Medicine 13: 37-43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preven, D., Kachur, D., Kupfer, R. & Waters, J. (1986). Interviewing skills of first year medical students. Journal of Medical Education 61: 842-844.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanson-Fisher, R.W. & Poole, A.D. (1980). Simulated patients and the assessment of students' interpersonal skills. Medical Education 14: 249-253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulman, B. (1979). Active patient orientation and outcomes in hypertensive treatment. Medical Care 17: 267-281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sleight, P. (1995). Teaching communication skills: part of medical education? Journal of Human Hypertension 9: 67-69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, M. (1984). What is a successful doctor-patient interview? A study of interactions and outcomes. Social Science and Medicin 19: 167-175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiles, W., Putman, S., Wolf, M. & James, S. (1979). Interaction exchange structure and patient satisfaction with medical interviews. Medical Care 17: 667-681.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streiner, D. (1985). Global rating scales. In V. Neufeld & G. Norman (eds), Assessing Clinical Competence, pp. 119-141. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streiner, D. & Norman, G. (1989). Health Measurement Scales. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valentino, J., Donnelly, M., Sloan, D., Schwartz, R. & Haydon, R. (1998). The reliability of six faculty members in identifying important OSCE items. Academic Medicine 73(2): 204-205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vu, N.V. & Barrows, H. (1994). Use of standardised patients in clinical assessments: recent developments and measurement findings. Educational Researcher 23: 23-30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vu, N.V., Barrows, H., Marcy, M. et al., (1992). Six years of comprehensive, clinical, performance-based assessment using standardized patients at the Southern Illinois University School of Medicine. Academic Medicine 67: 42-50.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G.M. Humphris.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Humphris, G., Kaney, S. The Liverpool Brief Assessment System for Communication Skills in the Making of Doctors. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 6, 69–80 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009879220949

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009879220949

Navigation