Skip to main content
Log in

Non-parametric MLE for Poisson species abundance models allowing for heterogeneity between species

  • Published:
Environmental and Ecological Statistics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The proper management of an ecological population is greatly aided by solid information about its species' abundances. For the general heterogeneous Poisson species abundance setting, we develop the non-parametric mle for the entire probability model, namely for the total number N of species and the generating distribution F for the expected values of the species' abundances. Solid estimation of the entire probability model allows us to develop generator-based measures of ecological diversity and evenness which have inferences over similar regions. Also, our methods produce a solid goodness-of-fit test for our model as well as a likelihood ratio test to examine if there is heterogeneity in the expected values of the species' abundances. These estimates and tests are examined, in detail, in the paper. In particular, we apply our methods to important data from the National Breeding Bird Survey and discuss how our methods can also be easily applied to sweep net sampling data. To further examine our methods, we provide simulations for several illustrative situations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Boulinier, T., Nichols, J.D., Pollock, K.H., Sauer, J.R. and Hines, J.E. (1996) On the use of closed models of capture-recapture to estimate bird species richness: a test with large scale data. Unpublished manuscript.

  • Bulmer, M. (1974) On fitting the Poisson lognormal distribution of species-abundance data. Biometrics, 30, 101–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnham, K.P. and Overton, W.S. (1979) Robust estimation of population size when capture probabilities vary among animals. Ecology, 60(5), 927–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bystrak, D. (1981) The North American Breeding Bird Survey. Studies in Avian Biology, 6, 34–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dempster, A.P., Laird, N.M. and Rubin, D.B. (1977) Maximum likelihood estimation from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 39, 1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Efron, B. (1981) Non-parametric estimates of standard error: The jackknife, the bootstrap and other methods. Biometrika, 68, 589–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Efron, B. and Thisted, R. (1976) Estimating the number of unseen species: how many words did Shakespeare know? Biometrika, 63(3), 435–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engen, S. (1978) Stochastic Abundance Models, Chapman and Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R.A., Corbet, A.S. and Williams, C.B. (1943) The relation between the number of species and the number of individuals in a random sample from an animal population. Journal of Animal Ecology, 12, 42–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kempton, R.A. and Taylor, L.R. (1974) Log-series and log-normal parameters as diversity discriminants for the Lepidoptera. Journal of Animal Ecology, 43, 381–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S. and Chao, A. (1994) Estimating population size via sample coverage for closed capture-recapture models. Biometrics, 50, 88–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay, B.G. and Roeder, K. (1992) Residual diagnostics for mixture models. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 87, 785–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ludwig, J.A. and Reynolds, J.F. (1988) Statistical Ecology: A Primer on Methods and Computing, John Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehninick, E.F. (1964) A comparison of some species individuals diversity indices applied to samples of field insects. Ecology, 45, 859–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, J.L. and Pollock, K.P. (1996) Non-parametric MLE under two closed capture-recapture models with heterogeneity. Biometrics, 52, 639–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preston, F.W. (1948) The commonness and rarity of species, Ecology, 29, 254–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, C.S., Bystrak, D. and Geissler, P.H. (1986) The breeding bird survey: its first fifteen years, 1965–1979. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Resource Publication 157, Washington, D.C., USA.

  • Romano, J.P. (1988) A bootstrap revival of some non-parametric distance tests. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83, 698–708.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon, C E. and Weaver, W. (1949) The Mathematical Theory of Communication, University Illinois Press, Urbana, Il.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sichel, H. (1991) Modelling species-abundance frequencies and species-individual functions with the generalized inverse Gaussian-Poisson distribution law. Unpublished manuscript, University of the Eitwatersrand, South Africa, Department of Statistics and Actuarial Science.

  • Simpson, E.H. (1949) Measurement of diversity. Nature, 163, 688.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, L.R., Kempton, R.A. and Woiwod, I.P. (1976) Diversity statistics and the log-series model. Journal of Animal Ecology, 45, 255–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Titterington, D. M. (1991) Some recent research in the analysis of mixture distributions. Statistics, 21, 619–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Titterington, D.M., Smith, A.F.M. and Makov, U.E. (1985) Statistical Analysis of Finite Mixture Distributions, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, England.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Norris, J.L., Pollock, K.H. Non-parametric MLE for Poisson species abundance models allowing for heterogeneity between species. Environmental and Ecological Statistics 5, 391–402 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009659922745

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009659922745

Navigation