Skip to main content
Log in

Quality of life and depression: Symmetry concepts

  • Published:
Quality of Life Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

From the theory of Three-Time-dimensions based on the disturbed temporal horizon of the depressed individual: Past, Present, therapeutic-Future, new concepts of phenomenological-depression and the intrinsic-quality of life have been defined, in which both are considered as the perception of a discrepancy between, on one hand, the healthy Past and Present ill-being, and on the other, the intensity of demand for recovery or a therapeutic-Future. In order to determine the symmetry of these two concepts, the Three-Time-dimensions Synoptic Scale (3TSS) was presented to 110 subjects who had been diagnosed as suffering from major primary depression. The demonstration was carried out in three stages, the first statistical, the second mathematical, and finally, a geometrical one; it showed the importance of the temporal horizon of the depressed person in diagnosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kish GB, Moody DR. Psychopathology and life pur– pose. Int For Logother 1989; 12: 40–45.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Burckhardt CS. The Ostomy Adjustment Scale: Fur– ther evidence of reliability and validity. Rehabilit Psych 1990; 35: 149–155.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Weissman MM. Panic disorder: Impact on quality of life. Annual Meeting of the American Psychiatric As– sociation Symposium: Panic disorder: Strategies for long–term treatment. J Clin Psych 1991; 52: 6–8.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Frisch MB, Cornell J, Villanueva M, Retzla. PJ. Clinical validation of the Quality of Life Inventory. A measure of life satisfaction for use in treatment plan– ning and outcome assessment. Psych Assess 1992; 4: 92–101.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Revicki D, Turner R, Brown R, Martindale JJ. Reli– ability and validity of a health–related quality of life battery for evaluating outpatient antidepressant treat– ment. Qual Life Res 1992; 1: 257–266.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sahoo FM. Bidyadhar S. The Subjective components of psychological well–being: An idiographic investigt– ion using the Lens Model. Psych Stud 1992; 37: 151–160.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Headey BW, Kelley I, Wearing AJ. Dimensions of mental health: Life satisfaction, positive affect, anxiety and depression. Soc Indic Res 1993; 29: 63–82.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kim S, Rew L. Ethnic identity, role integration, quality of life, and depression in Korean–American women. Arch Psychia Nurs 1994; 8: 348–356.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Turner R. Quality of life: Experience with sertraline: IX World Congress of Psychiatry Symposium: The search for the ideal antidepressant: How close are we? Int Clin Psychopharmacol 1994; 9: 27–31.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Moody L, Mc Cormick K, Williams A. Disease and symptom severity, functional status, and quality of life in chronic bronchitis and emphysema. J Beh Med 1990; 13: 297–306.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kind P, Sorenson J. The casts of depression. Third International Symposium: RIMAs in subtypes of de– pression: Focus on moclobemide. Int Clin Psychopo– harmacol 1993; 7: 191–195.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mechanic D, McAlpine D, Rosen®eld S, Davis D. Ef– fects of illness attribution and depression on the quality of life among persons with serious mental illness. Soc Sc Med 1994; 39: 155–164.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Beaumont G. Quality of life in primary care. Hum Psychopharmacol Clin Experim 1994; 9: 25–29.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Godding PR, McAnulty RD, Wittrock DA, Britt DM, et al. Predictors of depression among male cancer pa– tients. J Nerv Ment Disease 1995; 183: 95–98.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Conn VS, Taylor SG, Wiman P. Anxiety, depression, quality of life, and self–care among survivors of myo– cardial infarction. Iss Ment Heal Nurs 1991; 12: 321–331.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Endicott J, Nee J, Harrison W, Blunenthal R. Quality of life enjoyment and satisfaction questionnaire: A new measure. Psychopharmacol Bul 1993; 29: 321–326.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gregoire J, de Leval N, Mesters P, Czarka M. Vali– dation of the Quality of Life in Depressive Scale in a population of adult depressive patients aged 60 and above. Qual Life Res 1994; 3: 13–19.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Revicki DA, Kaplan RM. Relationship between psy– chometric and utility–based approaches to the mea– surement of health–related quality of life. Qual Life Res 1993; 2: 477–487.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Anderson RT, Aaronson NK, Wilkin D. Critical re– view of the international assessments of health–related quality of life. Qual Life Res 1993; 2: 369–395.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Naughton MJ, Woklund I. A critical review of di– mension–specific measures of health–related quality of life in cross–cultural research. Qual Life Res 1993; 2: 397–432.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kaplan RM, Feeny D, Revicki DA. Methods for as– sessing relative importance in preference based out– come measures. Qual Life Res 1993; 2: 467–475.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kaplan RM, Bush JW. Health–related quality of life measurement for evaluation research and policy anal– ysis. Health Psychol 1982; 1: 61–80.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Cella DF, Tulsky DS. Measuring quality of life today: Methodological aspects. Oncology 1990; 4: 29–38.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Jenkinson C, Wright L, Coulter A. Quality of Life Measurement in Health Care: A Review of Measures and Population Norms for the UK SF–36. Oxford: Health Services Research Unit, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Bullinger M. Quality of Life: definition, conceptual– ization and implications – a methodologist view. Theor Surg 1991; 6: 915–1055.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Walker SR, Rosser RM. Quality of life: Assessment and application. Lancaster: MTP Press, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hyland ME. A reformulation of quality of life for medical science. Qual Life Res 1992; 1: 267–272.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Hyland ME, Bott J, Singh S, Kenyon CA. Domains, constructs, and the development of the breathing prob– lems questionnaire. Qual Life Res 1994; 3: 245–256.

    Google Scholar 

  29. WHO QOL Group. Study protocol for the World Health Organisation project to develop a quality of life assessment instrument (WHOQOL). Qual Life Res 1993; 2: 153–159.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Guyatt GH, Feeny D, Patick DL. Measuring health– related quality of life. Ann Intern Med 1993; 118: 622–629.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Spilker B. Quality of life assessments in clinical trials, New York: Raven Press, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Banta D, Luce B. Health care technology and its as– sessment: An international perspective. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Ware J, Snow KK, Kosinski M. SF–36 Health survey: Manual and interpretation guide. Boston, MA: The Health Institute, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Gregoire J, de Leval N, Mesters P. Assessment of quality of life in the treatment of major depressive disorders with fluoxetine 20 mg in ambulatory patients aged over 60 years. Inter Clin Psychophar 1993; 9: 47–53.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Aaronson NK, Ahmed S, Bergman B. The European organisation for research and treatment of cancer QLQ – C30: A quality–of–life instrument for use in interna– tional clinical trials in oncology. J Nat Canc Inst 1993; 85: 365–376.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Kendrick A, Joyce CRB, Trimble MR, Selai CE. A new method for evaluating health–related quality of life based on repertory grid technique. Qual Life Res 1994; 3: 48.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Jenkinson C, Wright L, Coulter A. Criterion validity and reliability of the SF–36 in a population sample. Qual Life Res 1994; 3: 7–12.

    Google Scholar 

  38. American Psychiatric Association, Diagnostic Criteria from DSM–IV, 4th edn, Washington DC: American Psychiatric Association, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  39. de Leval N. Theorie des trois temps ou la qualite de vie du de pressif. Rev Psychol Psychom Langue Fr 1993; 14: 25–31.

    Google Scholar 

  40. de Leval N. Le vaste champs des e chelles de de pression: une e bauche de classement en fonction de la dimension du temps. Langage et l'homme 1994; 1: 37–47.

    Google Scholar 

  41. de Leval N. Scales of depression, ill–being and quality of life is there any difference? An assay in taxonomy. Qual of life Res 1995; 4: 259–269.

    Google Scholar 

  42. de Leval N. Theory, Taxonomy, Test: The Three Time dimensions Synoptic Scale – 3TSS. Rev Psychol Psy– chom Langue Fr 1996; 17: 1, 5–25.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Calman KC. Quality of life in cancer patients on hy– pothesis. Journ of Med Ethics 1984; 10: 124–127.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Michalos AC. Multiple discrepancies theory (MDT). Soc Indic Research 1985; 16: 347–414.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Dazord A. Evaluation de la qualite de vie subjective en psychiatrie. Visage de la depression 1992; 16: 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  46. de Leval N. Approche nouvelle de la qualite de vie du de pressif en fonction de l'horizon temporel: conception et mesure. Rev Psychol Psychom Langue Fr 1997; 18,(2/3): 5–30.

    Google Scholar 

  47. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 3rd edn, Revised (DSM–III–R), Washington DC: 1987.

  48. Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 1951; 16: 297–334.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Beck AT. An inventory for measuring depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1969; 4: 561–571.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Davis FB. Estimation and use of scoring weights for each choise in multiple–choice test items. Educ Psychol Measm't 1959; 9: 291–298.

    Google Scholar 

  51. de Leval N. A la recherche du temps passe ou la qualite de vie du de pressif. Submitted for publication.

  52. de Leval N. Essai de validation de la the orie des Trois Temps ou mesure de la validite conceptuelle de la Three Time dimensions, Synoptic Scale, 3TSS. Europ Rev Applied Psychol. To be published.

  53. de Leval N. L'e chelle synoptique des trois temps applique aÁ un e chantillon de 260 non–de pressifs. Sub– mitted for publication.

  54. de Leval N. Cre ation d'un nouveau type d'e chelle diagnostiquant les tendances suicidaires chez le de pressif aÁ partir de l'horizon temporel. Submitted for publication.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

de Leval, N. Quality of life and depression: Symmetry concepts. Qual Life Res 8, 283–291 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008970317554

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008970317554

Navigation