Skip to main content
Log in

Front-Tracking Finite Difference Methods for the Valuation of American Options

  • Published:
Computational Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper is concerned with the numerical solution of the American option valuation problem formulated as a parabolic free boundary/initial value model. We introduce and analyze a front-tracking finite difference method and compare it with other commonly used techniques. The numerical experiments performed indicate that the front-tracking method considered is an efficient alternative for approximating simultaneously the option value and free boundary functions associated with the valuation problem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amin, K. and Khanna, A. (1994). Convergence of American option values from discrete to continuous time financial models. Mathematical Finance, 4, 289-304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barone-Adesi, G. and Whaley, R. (1987). Efficient analytic approximation of American option values. The Journal of Finance, XLII(2), 301-320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, F. and Scholes, M. (1973). The pricing of options and corporate liabilities. Journal of Political Economy, 81, 637-659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, P., Broadie, M. and Glasserman, P. (1995). Monte Carlo methods for security pricing. Technical report, Columbia University.

  • Brennan, M. and Schwartz, E. (1978). Finite difference methods and jump processes arising in the pricing of contingent claims: A synthesis. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 13, 461-474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, P. and Faguet, D. (1995). Fast accurate valuation of American options. Technical report, Cornell University.

  • Cheyette, O. (1990). Pricing options on multiple assets. Advances in Futures and Options Research, 4, 69-81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldenberg, D. H. and Schmidt, R. J. (1994). Estimating the early exercise boundary and pricing American options. Technical report, Rensselear Polytechnic Institute.

  • Cox, J., Ross, S. and Rubinstein, M. (1979). Option pricing: A simplified approach. Journal of Financial Economics, 7, 229-264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crank, J. and Gupta, R. S. (1972). A moving boundary problem arising from the diffusion of oxygen in absorbing tissue. J. Inst. Math. Appl., 10, 19-33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, M. and Pliska, S. (1981). Martingales and stochastic integrals in the theory of continuous trading. Stochastic Processes and their Applications, 11, 215-260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaillet, P., Lemberton, D., and Lapeyre, B. (1990). Variational inequalities and the pricing of American options. Acta Applicandae Mathematicae, 21, 263-289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, H. (1983). An analytic approximation to the American put price. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 17, 141-148.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacMillan, L.W. (1986). An analytic approximation for the American put price. Advances in Futures and Options Research, 1, 119-139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madan, D., Milne, F. and Shefrin, H. (1989). The multinomial option pricing model and its Brownian and Poisson limits. Review of Financial Studies, 4, 251-266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R.C. (1973). Theory of rational option pricing. Bell Journal of Economics and Finance, 4, 141-183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, G.H. and van der Hoek, J. (1995). The valuation of American options with the method of lines. Technical report, Georgia Institute of Technology.

  • Mori, Masatake (1975). Numerical solution of the Stefan problem by the finite element method. Memoirs of Numerical Mathematics, 2, 35-44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Omberg, Edward (1988). Efficient discrete time jump process models in option pricing. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 23(2), 161-174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pantazopoulos, K.N. and Houstis, E.N. (1997). Modern software techniques in computational finance. In E. Arge, A.M. Bruaset and H. P. Langtagen (eds.), Modern Software Tools for Scientific Computing. Birkhauser, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pantazopoulos, K.N., Houstis, E.N. and Kortesis, S. (1997). Valuation of American options with finite difference methods. Technical Report CSD TR-97-054, Computer Science Dept., Purdue University.

  • Sackett, G.G. (1971). An implicit free boundary problem for the heat equation. SIAM Journal of Numerical Analysis, 8(1), 80-96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, E. (1977). The valuation of warrants: Implementing a new approach. Journal of Financial Economics, 4, 79-93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whaley, R. (1981). On the valuation of American call options on stocks with known dividends. Journal of Financial Economics, 10, 207-211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilmott, P., Dewynne, J. and Howison, S. (1993). Option Pricing: Mathematical Models and Computation. Oxford Financial Press.

  • Wu, L. (1996). A front-fixing finite difference method for the valuation of American options. In Proceedings of the IAFE First Annual Computational Finance Conference, Stanford.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pantazopoulos, K., Houstis, E. & Kortesis, S. Front-Tracking Finite Difference Methods for the Valuation of American Options. Computational Economics 12, 255–273 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008695215988

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008695215988

Navigation