Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Spatial and Temporal Efficiency in Climate Policy: Applications of FUND

  • Published:
Environmental and Resource Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

FUND is an integrated assessment model of the interactions between climate and economy. Nine world regions emit greenhouse gases, and suffer damages from climate change. A number of greenhouse gas emission reduction policies are compared, including optimal and cost-effective strategies, strategies with early and late abatement, and strategies with and without international co-operation. The analyses confirm that co-operation matters, resulting in substantially lower costs or higher welfare. The real commitments of policy targets based on an absolute level (e.g., 1990 emissions) are hard to estimate because of the uncertainties in the baseline. Postponing action conflicts with minimising costs and maximising welfare, but so does sharp emission reduction at the short-term as proposed in the Kyoto Protocol.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Azar, C. and H. Rodhe (1997), ‘Targets for Stabilisation of Atmospheric CO2’, Science 276, 1818–1819.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banuri, T., K.-G. Maeler, M. J. Grubb, H. K. Jacobson and F. Yamin (1996), ‘Equity and Social Considerations’, in J. P. Bruce, H. Lee and E. F. Haites, eds., Climate Change 1995: Economic and Social Dimensions — Contribution of Working Group III to the Second Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 79–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batjes, J. J. and C. G. M. Goldewijk (1994), The IMAGE 2 Hundred Year (1890–1990) Database of the Global Environment (HYDE), 410100082. Bilthoven: RIVM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmonds, J. A., J. Dooley and M. Wise (1997), ‘The Role of Energy Technology in Atmospheric Stabilization’, in B. P. Flannery, K. R. Kohlhase and D. G. LeVine, eds., Critical Issues in the Economics of Climate Change. London: IPIECA, pp. 107–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, B. S., S. Barrett, P. Bohm, M. Kuroda, J. K. E. Mubazi, A. Shah and R. N. Stavins (1996), ‘An Economic Assessment of Policy Instruments to Combat Climate Change’, in J. P. Bruce, H. Lee and E. F. Haites, eds., Climate Change 1995: Economic and Social Dimensions — Contributions of Working Group III to the Second Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 397–439.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grubb, M. J. (1997), ‘Technologies, Energy Systems and the Timing of CO2 Emissions Abatement’, Energy Policy 25(2), 159–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ha-Duong, M., M. J. Grubb and J.-C. Hourcade (1997), ‘Influence of Socioeconomic Inertia and Uncertainty on Optimal CO2-Emission Abatement’, Nature 389, 270–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammitt, J. K., R. J. Lempert and M. E. Schlesinger (1992), ‘A Sequential-Decision Strategy for Abating Climate Change’, Nature 357, 315–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hourcade, J. C., K. Halsneas, M. Jaccard, W. D. Montgomery, R. G. Richels, J. Robinson, P. R. Shukla and P. Sturm (1996), ‘A Review of Mitigation Cost Studies’, in J. P. Bruce, H. Lee and E. F. Haites, eds., Climate Change 1995: Economic and Social Dimensions — Contributions of Working Group III to the Second Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 297–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kattenberg, A., F. Giorgi, H. Grassl, G. A. Mechl, J. F. B. Mitchell, R. J. Stouffer, T. Tokioka, A. J. Weaver and T. M. L. Wigley (1996), ‘Climate Models — Projections of Future Climate’, in J. T. Houghton, L. G. Meiro Filho, B. A. Callander, N. Harris, A. Kattenberg and K. Maskell, eds., Climate Change 1995: The Science of Climate Change — Contributions of Working Group I to the Second Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 1 edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 285–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leggett, J., W. J. Pepper and R. J. Swart (1992), ‘Emissions Scenarios for the IPCC: An Update’, in J. T. Houghton, B. A. Callander and S. K. Varney, eds., Climate Change 1992 — The Supplementary Report to the IPCC Scientific Assessment, 1 edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 71–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, A. S. and R. G. Richels (1996), ‘The Berlin Mandate: The Costs of Meeting Post-2000 Targets and Timetables’, Energy Policy 24(3), 205–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manne, A. S. and R. G. Richels (1997), ‘The Greenhouse Debate — Economic Efficiency, Burden Sharing and Hedging Strategies’, in B. P. Flannery, K. R. Kohlhase and D. G. LeVine, eds., Critical Issues in the Economics of Climate Change. London: IPIECA, pp. 81–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordhaus, W. D. (1994), Managing the Global Commons: The Economics of Climate Change. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordhaus, W. D. and Z. Yang (1996), ‘RICE: A Regional Dynamic General Equilibrium Model of Optimal Climate-Change Policy’, American Economic Review 86(4), 741–765.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, D. W., W. R. Cline, A. N. Achanta, S. Frankhauser, R. K. Pachauri, R. S. J. Tol and P. Vellinga (1996), ‘The Social Costs of Climate Change: Greenhouse Damage and the Benefits of Control’, in J. P. Bruce, H. Lee and E. F. Haites, eds., Climate Change 1995: Economic and Social Dimensions — Contributions of Working Group III to the Second Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 179–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramakrishna, K. (1997), ‘The Great Debate on CO2 Emissions’, Nature 390, 227–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rayner, S. and E. L. Malone (1997), ‘Zen and the Art of Climate Maintenance’, Nature 390, 332–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, A. and B. Stevens (1993), ‘The Efficiency and Equity of Marketable Permits for CO2 Emissions’, Resource and Energy Economics 15, 117–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schimel, D., D. Alves, I. Enting, M. Heimann, F. Joos, M. Raynaud, R. Derwent, D. Ehhalt, P. Fraser, E. Sanhueza, X. Zhou, P. Jonas, R. Charlson, H. Rodhe, S. Sadasivan, K. P. Shine, Y. Fouquart, V. Ramaswamy, S. Solomon, J. Srinivasan, D. Albritton, I. Isaksen, M. Lal and D. Wuebbles (1996), ‘Radiative Forcing of Climate Change’, in J. T. Houghton, L. G. Meiro Filho, B. A. Callander, B. A. Harris, A. Kattenberg and K. Maskell, eds., Climate Change 1995: The Science of Climate Change — Contribution of Working Group 1 to the Second Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 1 edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 65–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, S. H. and L. H. Goulder (1997), ‘Achieving Low-Cost Emissions Targets’, Nature 389, 13–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shine, K. P., R. G. Derwent, D. J. Wuebbles, and J.-J. Morcrette (1990), ‘Radiative Forcing of Climate’, in J. T. Houghton, G. J. Jenkins and J. J. Ephraums, eds., Climate Change — The IPCC Scientific Assessment, 1 edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 41–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tol, R. S. J. (1996), ‘The Damage Costs of Climate Change Towards a Dynamic Representation’, Ecological Economics 19, 67–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tol, R. S. J. (1997a), ‘On the Optimal Control of Carbon Dioxide Emissions — An Application of FUND’, Environmental Modelling and Assessment 2, 151–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tol, R. S. J. (1997b), Timing of Abatement: Equity and Rationality. FEEM/EMF International Conference on International Environmental Agreements on Climate Change, May 6–7, Venice.

  • Weyant, J. P., O. Davidson, H. Dowlatabadi, J. A. Edmonds, M. J. Grubb, E. A. Parson, R. G. Richels, J. Rotmans, P. R. Shukla, R. S. J. Tol, W. R. Cline and S. Frankhauser (1996), ‘Integrated Assessment on Climate Change: An Overview and Comparison of Approaches and Results’, in J. P. Bruce, H. Lee and E. F. Haites, eds., Climate Change 1995: Economic and Social Dimensions — Contributions of Working Group III to the Second Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 367–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weyant, J. P. (1997a), IPCC/EMF Climate Policy Scenario Exercise (draft).

  • Weyant, J. P. (1997b), ‘Insights from Integrated Assessment’, in B. P. Flannery, K. R. Kohlhase and D. G. LeVine, eds., Critical Issues in the Economics of Climate Change. London: IPIECA, pp. 245–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wigley, T. M. L., R. G. Richels and J. A. Edmonds (1996), ‘Economic and Environmental Choices in the Stabilisation of Atmospheric CO2 Concentrations’, Nature 379, 240–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wigley, T. M. L. (1997), ‘Implications of Recent CO2 Emission-Limitation Proposals for Stabilisation of Atmospheric Concentrations’, Nature 390, 267–270.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute for Environmental Studies, Vrije Universiteit, De Boelelaan 1115, 1081 HV, The Netherlands (e-mail

    Richard S.J. Tol

Authors
  1. Richard S.J. Tol
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tol, R.S. Spatial and Temporal Efficiency in Climate Policy: Applications of FUND. Environmental and Resource Economics 14, 33–49 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008314205375

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008314205375

Search

Navigation