Skip to main content
Log in

Variability in automated assignment of NOESY spectra and three-dimensional structure determination: A test case on three small disulfide-bonded proteins

  • Published:
Journal of Biomolecular NMR Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Three independent runs of automatic assignment and structure calculations were performed on three small proteins, calcicludine from the venom of the green mamba Dendroaspis angusticeps, κ-conotoxin PVIIA from the purple cone Conus purpurascens and HsTX1, a short scorpion toxin from the venom of Heterometrus spinnifer. At the end of all the runs, the number of cross peaks which remained unassigned (0.6%, 1.4% and 2% for calcicludine, κ-conotoxin and HsTX1, respectively), as well as the number of constraints which were rejected as producing systematic violations (2.7%, 1.0%, and 1.4% for calcicludine, κ-conotoxin and HsTX1, respectively) were low. The conformation of the initial model used in the procedure (linear model or constructed by homology) has no influence on the final structures. Mainly two parameters control the procedure: the chemical shift tolerance and the cut-off distance. Independent runs of structure calculations, using the same parameters, yield structures for which the rmsd between averaged structures and the rmsd around each averaged structure were of the same order of magnitude. A different cut-off distance and a different chemical shift tolerance yield rmsd values on final average structures which did not differ more than 0.5 Å compared to the rmsd obtained around the averaged structure for each calculation. These results show that the procedure is robust when applied to such a small disulfide-bonded protein.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aue, B.P., Bartholi, E. and Ernst, R.R. (1976) J. Chem. Phys., 64, 2229-2246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartels, C., Güntert, P., Billeter, M. and Wüthrich, K. (1997) J. Comput. Chem., 18, 139–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonvin, A., Boelens, R. and Kaptein, R. (1993) In Computer Simulation of Biomolecular Systems: Theoretical and Experimental Applications, Vol. 2 (Eds., van Gunsteren, W., Weiner, P. and Wilkinson, A.), ESCOM, Leiden, p. 407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braunschweiler, L. and Ernst, R.R. (1983) J. Magn. Reson., B53, 521–528.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brünger, A. (1992) X-PLOR Version 3.1: A System for X-Ray Crystallography and NMR, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brüschweiler, R. and Case, D. (1994) Prog. NMR Spectrosc., 26, 27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchler, N.E., Zuiderweg, E.R., Wang, H. and Goldstein, R.A. (1997) J. Magn. Reson., 125, 34–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chalaoux, F.R., O'Donoghue, S.I. and Nilges, M. (1999) Proteins, 34, 453–463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clore, G.M., Robien, M.A. and Gronenborn, A.M. (1993) J. Mol. Biol., 231, 82–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folmer, R.H., Hilbers, C.W., Konings, R.N. and Nilges, M. (1997) J. Biomol. NMR, 9, 245–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraternali, F., Amodeo, P., Musco, G., Nilges, M. and Pastore, A. (1999) Proteins, 34, 484–496.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilquin, B., Lecoq, A., Desne, F., Guenneugues, M., Zinn-Justin, S. and Menez, A. (1999) Proteins, 34, 520–532.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hare, B.J. and Prestegard, J.H. (1994) J. Biomol. NMR, 4, 35–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyberts, S.G., Marki, W. and Wagner, G. (1987) Eur. J. Biochem., 164, 625–635.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, T.L. (1991) Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 1, 1042.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koradi, R., Billeter, M., Engeli, M., Güntert, P. and Wüthrich, K. (1998) J. Magn. Reson., 135, 288–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, A., Ernst, R.R. and Wüthrich, K. (1980) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun, 95, 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laskowski, R.A., Rullmann, J.A., MacArthur, M.W., Kaptein, R. and Thornton, J.M. (1996) J. Biomol. NMR, 8, 477–486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebrun, B., Romi-Lebrun, R., Martin-Eauclaire, M.F., Yasuda, A., Ishiguro, M., Oyama, Y., Pongs, O. and Nakajima, T. (1997) Biochem. J., 328, 321–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Y., Zhao, D., Altman, R. and Jardetzky, O. (1992) J. Biomol. NMR, 2, 373–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, H., Farr-Jones, S., Ulyanov, N.B., Llinas, M., Marqusee, S., Groth, D., Cohen, F.E., Prusiner, S.B. and James, T.L. (1999) Biochemistry, 38, 5362–5377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meadows, R.P., Olejniczak, E.T. and Fesik, S.W. (1994) J. Biomol. NMR, 4, 79–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morelle, N., Brutscher, B., Simorre, J.-P. and Marion, D. (1995) J. Biomol. NMR, 5, 154–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moseley, H.N. and Montelione, G.T. (1999) Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 9635–642

    Google Scholar 

  • Mumenthaler, C. and Braun, W. (1995) J. Mol. Biol., 254, 465–480.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mumenthaler, C., Güntert, P., Braun, W. and Wüthrich, K. (1997) J. Biomol. NMR, 10, 351–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilges, M. (1995) J. Mol. Biol., 245, 645–660.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilges, M., Macias, M.J., O'Donoghue, S.I. and Oschkinat, H. (1997) J. Mol. Biol., 269, 408–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilges, M. and O'Donoghue, S.I. (1998) Prog. NMR Spectrosc., 32, 107–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, J.B. Jr. and Markley, J.L. (1994) J. Biomol. NMR, 4, 385–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pardi, A., Billeter, M. and Wüthrich, K. (1984) J. Mol. Biol., 180, 741–751.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rance, M., Sørensen, O.W., Bodenhausen, G., Wagner, G., Ernst, R.R. and Wüthrich, K. (1983) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 117, 479–485.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savarin, P., Guenneugues, M., Gilquin, B., Lamthanh, H., Gasparini, S., Zinn-Justin, S. and Menez, A. (1998) Biochemistry, 37, 5407–5416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savarin, P., Romi-Lebrun, R., Zinn-Justin, S., Lebrun, B., Nakajima, T., Gilquin, B. and Menez, A. (1999) Protein Sci., 8, 2672–2685.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, T.R., Brünger, A.T. and Nilges, M. (1999) J. Mol. Biol., 285, 727–740.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweitz, H., Heurteaux, C., Bois, P., Moinier, D., Romey, G. and Lazdunski, M. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 91, 878–882.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terlau, H., Shon, K.J., Grilley, M., Stocker, M., Stuhmer, W. and Olivera, B.M. (1996) Nature, 381, 148–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wüthrich, K. (1986) NMR of Proteins and Nucleic Acids, Wiley, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, Y., Wu, J., Gorenstein, D. and Braun, W. (1999) J. Magn. Reson., 136, 76–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, D. and Jardetzky, O. (1994) J. Mol. Biol., 239, 601–607.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Savarin, P., Zinn-Justin, S. & Gilquin, B. Variability in automated assignment of NOESY spectra and three-dimensional structure determination: A test case on three small disulfide-bonded proteins. J Biomol NMR 19, 49–62 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008311110174

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008311110174

Navigation