Abstract
In this paper we prove that the principles in the languagewith relation composition and dynamic implication, valid forall binary relations, are the same ones as the principlesvalid when we restrict ourselves to DPL-relations,i.e. relations generated from conditions (tests) and resettings.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
van Benthem, J.F.A.K., 1993, "Program constructions that are safe for bisimulation," CSLI Report 93-179, CSLI, Stanford University, Stanford, to appear in Proceedings Logic Colloquium, Clermont Ferrant, 1994, Studia Logica.
van Benthem, J.F.A.K. and Ceparello, G., 1994, "Tarskian variations. Dynamic parameters in classical semantics," CS R9419, Amsterdam: CWI.
Blackburn, P. and Venema, Y., 1995, "Dynamic squares," Journal of Philosophical Logic 24(5), 469–523.
Groenendijk, J. and M. Stokhof, M., 1991, "Dynamic predicate logic," Linguistics and Philosophy 14, 39–100.
Hollenberg, M.J., "Safety for bisimulation in general modal logic," pp. 359–376 in Proceedings of the 10th Amsterdam Colloquium, Part II, P. Dekker et al., eds., Amsterdam: ILLC, Department of Philosophy, University of Amsterdam.
Hollenberg, M.J., 1997, "An equational axiomatisation of dynamic negation and relational composition," Journal of Logic, Language, and Information, this issue.
Kamp, H., 1981, "A theory of truth and semantic representation," in Formal Methods in the Study of Language, J. Groenendijk et al., eds., Amsterdam: Mathematisch Centrum.
Visser, A., 1995, "Contexts for dynamic predicate logic," Logic Group Preprint Series 143, Department of Philosophy, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 8, 3584 CS Utrecht, October 1995, to appear in Journal of Logic, Language, and Informationspecial issue on Contexts.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Visser, A. Dynamic Relation Logic Is the Logic of DPL-Relations. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 6, 441–452 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008228122853
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008228122853