Skip to main content
Log in

The Signaling Impact of Low Introductory Price on Perceived Quality and Trial

  • Published:
Marketing Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Economic signaling theory suggests that consumers interpret price withinthe context of market conditions. Under specific conditions it predicts thatlow price may signal high quality. Results from an experiment designed totest the behavioral assumptions underlying this prediction indicate thatconsumers intentions to purchase conform to the predictions of economicsignaling theory, but their judgments of product quality do not. The resultssuggest that consumers' response to signals may be more complex thanpreviously shown.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Boulding, William, and Amna Kirmani. (1993). “A Consumer-Side Experimental Examination of Signaling Theory: Do Consumers Perceive Warranties as Signals of Quality?” Journal of Consumer Research 20 (June), 111–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chu, Wujin. (1993). “Demand Signalling and Screening in Channels of Distribution,” Marketing Science 11, 4, 327–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, Daniel, Jack L. Knetsch, and Richard Thaler. (1986). “Fairness as a Constraint on Profit Seeking: Entitlements in the Market,” The American Economic Review 76 (September), 728–741.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirmani, Amna. (1990). “The Effect of Perceived Advertising Costs on Brand Perceptions,” Journal of Consumer Research 17 (September), 160–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirmani, Amna, and Peter Wright. (1989). “Money Talks: Perceived Advertising Expense and Expected Product Quality,” Journal of Consumer Research 16 (December), 344–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenstein, Donald R., and Scot Burton. (1989). “The Relationship Between Perceived and Objective Price–Quality”, Journal of Marketing Research (Nov.), 429–443.

  • Monroe, Kent B., and R. Krishnan. (1985). “The Effect of Price on Subjective Product Evaluations,” in Perceived Quality: How Consumers View Stores and Merchandise, Jacob Jacoby and Jerry C. Olson (eds.), Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, pp 209–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, Philip. (1970). “Information and Consumer Behavior,” Journal of Political Economy 78(2), 311–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, Philip. (1974). “Advertising as Information,” Journal of Political Economy 81 (July–August), 729–754.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okun, Arthur. (1981). Prices and Quantities: A Macroeconomic Analysis. Washington: The Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmalensee, Richard. (1978). “A Model of Advertising and Product Quality,” Journal of Political Economy 86(31), 485–503.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tirole, Jean. (1992). The Theory of Industrial Organization, Second Edition, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urbany, Joel E., Thomas J. Madden, and Peter R. Dickson. (1989). “All's Not Fair in Pricing: An Initial Look at the Dual Entitlement Principle,” Marketing Letters 1(1), December, 17–26.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dawar, N., Sarvary, M. The Signaling Impact of Low Introductory Price on Perceived Quality and Trial. Marketing Letters 8, 251–259 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007963128115

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007963128115

Navigation