Abstract
Justifications of policies must be clearly warranted if educational leaders are to continue to maintain integrity and to sustain the trust of those served. Educators are called upon to mediate many private and public interests, including those pertaining to personal, organizational, professional, and societal values. This work of mediating conflicting values often relates to guarding and/or advocating the interests of children. Leaders must understand what they mean when evoking the potent phrase in the best interests of children. More importantly, they must avoid the temptations of sophistic misuses of the best interests of children notion. What is meant when we say we are deciding in the best interests of children? Each of the political, psychological, pedagogical, philosophical, jurisprudential, and ethical grounds undergirding the concept of the best interests of the child contributes content and meaning to the phrase. While each of these perspectives merits consideration, this article is delimited to an exploration of three interpretations from the field of jurisprudence and four interpretations from the field of ethics.
REFERENCES
American Declaration of Rights and Duties of Man. (1948). O.A.S. Res. Adapted by the Ninth International Conference of American States, Bogata. Actas y Documentos, VI, 297–302. Http://www.oas.org/EN/Prog/pg 117-25/html.
Bailey, F. (1988). Humbuggery and manipulation: The art of leadership. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Barker, S. (1992). What is a profession? Professional Ethics, 1(1,2), 73–99.
Barnett, B., McQuarrie, F. & Norris, C. (Eds.). (1991). The moral imperatives of leadership: A focus on human decency. Memphis: National Policy Board for Educational Administration.
Bentham, J. (1988). The principles of morals and legislation. New York: Prometheus Books. (Original work published 1781)
Bottery, M. (1992). The ethics of educational management. London: Cassell Educational Limited.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1970). Two worlds of childhood: U.S. and U.S.S.R. New York: Russel Sage.
Brown, M. (1991). Working ethics: Strategies for decision making and organizational responsibility. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Burke, K. (1969). A grammar of motives. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Caplan, A. & Callahan, D. (1987). Ethics in hard times. New York: Plenum Press.
Catholic Children's Aid Society of Metropolitan Toronto v. C.M. S.C.J. No. 37. (1994)
Coleman, P. (1993). A proposal for terminationg parental rights: Spare the parent, spoil the child. American Journal of Family Law, 123(7), 133f.
Convention on the rights of the child. Adopted by the General Assembly of the United Nations on 20 November 1989. Http://www.eurochild.gla.ac.uk/Documents/UN/Rights/unconvention.html.
Davis, S. & Schwartz, M. (1987). Children's rights and the law. Toronton: Lexington Books.
Fenstermacher, G. (1991). Some moral considerations on teaching as a profession. In Goodlad, Solder & Sirotnik (Eds.), The moral dimensions of teaching (pp. 130–151). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Gaylin, W. & Macklin, R. (Eds.). (1982), Who speaks for the child: The problems of proxy consent. New York: Plenum Press.
Goldstein, J., Freud, A., & Solnit, A. (1979a). Before the best interests of the child. New York: The Free Press.
Goldstein, J., Freud, A., & Solnit, A. (1979b). Beyond the best interests of the child. New York: The Free Press.
Josephson, M. (1992). Making ethical decisions: Using the six pillars of character. Marina del Ray: The Josephson Institute of Ethics.
Kant, I. (1983). Grounding for the metaphysics of morals. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company. (Original work published 1785)
King v. Low. I.S.C.R. 87. (1985).
Kreeft, P. (1990). Back to virtue. San Francisco: Ignatius Press.
Lewis, C. (1943a). The abolition of man. New York: Macmillan.
Lewis, C. (1943b). Christian behaviour. New York: Centenary Press.
MacIntyre, A. (1981). After virtue: A study of moral theory. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
MacIntyre, A. (1988). Whose justice? Which rationality? Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
MacKay, A. & Sutherland, L. (1992). Teachers and the law: A practical guide for educators. Toronto: Emond Montgomery Publications Limited.
McGill, V. (1967). The idea of happiness. New York: Praeger.
Mill, J. (1979). Utilitarianism. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company. (Original work published 1861)
Montgomery, J. (1986). Human rights and human dignity. Grand Rapids: Zondervan Publishing House.
Ross, W. (1939). Foundations of ethics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Scheffler, I. (1985). Of human potential. An essay in the philosophy of education. Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Schoch, M. (Ed.). (1948). The jurisprudence of interests. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Schwartz, I. (1989). (In) Justice for juveniles: Rethinking the best interests of the child. Toronto: Lexington Books.
Sockett, H. (1991). Accountability, trust and ethical codes of practice. In J. Goodlad, R. Soder & K. Sirotnik (Eds.), The moral dimensions of teaching (pp. 224–250). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Soder, R. (1991). The rhetoric of teacher professionalization. In J. Goodlad, R. Soder, & K. Strotnik (Eds.). The moral dimensions of teaching (pp. 35–86). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Universal Declaration of Human Rights. (1948). International Human Rights Implements of the United Nations, 1948–1982. Pleasantville, NY: UNICO Publishers. Http://www.asociety.com/udhr.html
Wagner, R. (1989). Accountability in education: A philosophical inquiry. New York: Routledge.
Walker, K. (1992). Ethical choices: The nature of ethical decision-making in educational leadership. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Wilson, J.O. (1992, June). The efficient state versus the ethical state: An economic perspective. Paper presented at the Second International Conference on Public Service Ethics, Sienna, Italy.
Young v. Young, 4 S.C.R. 3 (1993).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Walker, K. Jurisprudential and Ethical Perspectives on "The Best Interests of Children". Interchange 29, 287–308 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007561315049
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007561315049