Skip to main content
Log in

Jurisprudential and Ethical Perspectives on "The Best Interests of Children"

  • Published:
Interchange Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Justifications of policies must be clearly warranted if educational leaders are to continue to maintain integrity and to sustain the trust of those served. Educators are called upon to mediate many private and public interests, including those pertaining to personal, organizational, professional, and societal values. This work of mediating conflicting values often relates to guarding and/or advocating the interests of children. Leaders must understand what they mean when evoking the potent phrase in the best interests of children. More importantly, they must avoid the temptations of sophistic misuses of the best interests of children notion. What is meant when we say we are deciding in the best interests of children? Each of the political, psychological, pedagogical, philosophical, jurisprudential, and ethical grounds undergirding the concept of the best interests of the child contributes content and meaning to the phrase. While each of these perspectives merits consideration, this article is delimited to an exploration of three interpretations from the field of jurisprudence and four interpretations from the field of ethics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • American Declaration of Rights and Duties of Man. (1948). O.A.S. Res. Adapted by the Ninth International Conference of American States, Bogata. Actas y Documentos, VI, 297–302. Http://www.oas.org/EN/Prog/pg 117-25/html.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, F. (1988). Humbuggery and manipulation: The art of leadership. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, S. (1992). What is a profession? Professional Ethics, 1(1,2), 73–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, B., McQuarrie, F. & Norris, C. (Eds.). (1991). The moral imperatives of leadership: A focus on human decency. Memphis: National Policy Board for Educational Administration.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentham, J. (1988). The principles of morals and legislation. New York: Prometheus Books. (Original work published 1781)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bottery, M. (1992). The ethics of educational management. London: Cassell Educational Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1970). Two worlds of childhood: U.S. and U.S.S.R. New York: Russel Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M. (1991). Working ethics: Strategies for decision making and organizational responsibility. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, K. (1969). A grammar of motives. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caplan, A. & Callahan, D. (1987). Ethics in hard times. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catholic Children's Aid Society of Metropolitan Toronto v. C.M. S.C.J. No. 37. (1994)

  • Coleman, P. (1993). A proposal for terminationg parental rights: Spare the parent, spoil the child. American Journal of Family Law, 123(7), 133f.

    Google Scholar 

  • Convention on the rights of the child. Adopted by the General Assembly of the United Nations on 20 November 1989. Http://www.eurochild.gla.ac.uk/Documents/UN/Rights/unconvention.html.

  • Davis, S. & Schwartz, M. (1987). Children's rights and the law. Toronton: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenstermacher, G. (1991). Some moral considerations on teaching as a profession. In Goodlad, Solder & Sirotnik (Eds.), The moral dimensions of teaching (pp. 130–151). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaylin, W. & Macklin, R. (Eds.). (1982), Who speaks for the child: The problems of proxy consent. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, J., Freud, A., & Solnit, A. (1979a). Before the best interests of the child. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, J., Freud, A., & Solnit, A. (1979b). Beyond the best interests of the child. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Josephson, M. (1992). Making ethical decisions: Using the six pillars of character. Marina del Ray: The Josephson Institute of Ethics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1983). Grounding for the metaphysics of morals. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company. (Original work published 1785)

    Google Scholar 

  • King v. Low. I.S.C.R. 87. (1985).

  • Kreeft, P. (1990). Back to virtue. San Francisco: Ignatius Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, C. (1943a). The abolition of man. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, C. (1943b). Christian behaviour. New York: Centenary Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. (1981). After virtue: A study of moral theory. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. (1988). Whose justice? Which rationality? Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKay, A. & Sutherland, L. (1992). Teachers and the law: A practical guide for educators. Toronto: Emond Montgomery Publications Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGill, V. (1967). The idea of happiness. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J. (1979). Utilitarianism. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company. (Original work published 1861)

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, J. (1986). Human rights and human dignity. Grand Rapids: Zondervan Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, W. (1939). Foundations of ethics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheffler, I. (1985). Of human potential. An essay in the philosophy of education. Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoch, M. (Ed.). (1948). The jurisprudence of interests. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, I. (1989). (In) Justice for juveniles: Rethinking the best interests of the child. Toronto: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sockett, H. (1991). Accountability, trust and ethical codes of practice. In J. Goodlad, R. Soder & K. Sirotnik (Eds.), The moral dimensions of teaching (pp. 224–250). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soder, R. (1991). The rhetoric of teacher professionalization. In J. Goodlad, R. Soder, & K. Strotnik (Eds.). The moral dimensions of teaching (pp. 35–86). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Universal Declaration of Human Rights. (1948). International Human Rights Implements of the United Nations, 1948–1982. Pleasantville, NY: UNICO Publishers. Http://www.asociety.com/udhr.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, R. (1989). Accountability in education: A philosophical inquiry. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, K. (1992). Ethical choices: The nature of ethical decision-making in educational leadership. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatchewan, Canada.

  • Wilson, J.O. (1992, June). The efficient state versus the ethical state: An economic perspective. Paper presented at the Second International Conference on Public Service Ethics, Sienna, Italy.

  • Young v. Young, 4 S.C.R. 3 (1993).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Walker, K. Jurisprudential and Ethical Perspectives on "The Best Interests of Children". Interchange 29, 287–308 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007561315049

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007561315049

Navigation