Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Ambiguous Communication of Sexual Intentions as a Risk Marker of Sexual Aggression

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Three studies are reported that explored the role of ambiguous communication of sexual intentions as a risk factor for sexual aggression and victimization. Two main forms of ambiguous communication were distinguished: token resistance (saying “no” when you mean “yes”) and compliance (saying “yes” when you mean “no”). Two samples of heterosexual men and women and a sample of homosexual men with a total N of 1284 completed a measure of sexual victimization or aggression and indicated whether or not they had ever shown token resistance or compliance in a sexual encounter. Moreover, the heterosexual male respondents indicated whether they had ever perceived token resistance or compliance in a female partner. Logistic regression analyses revealed that the risk of experiencing sexual victimization was significantly increased as a function of token resistance. Two of the three studies also showed compliance to be a risk factor for sexual victimization. For the male respondents, token resistance was consistently linked to a higher likelihood of perpetrating sexually aggressive acts in the three studies. Perceived compliance was also found to increase the risk of sexual aggression in three of four analyses. Support for a link between perceived token resistance and sexual aggression was found in the first study only. Overall, the findings suggest that the use of ambiguous communication in negotiating sexual encounters is associated with an increased risk of sexual victimization as well as perpetration of sexually aggressive acts in both heterosexual and homosexual contacts. The implications of the findings are discussed with respect to the issue of rape prevention.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Abbey, A. (1991). Misperception as an antecedent of acquaintance rape: A consequence of ambiguity in communication between women and men. In A. Parrot & L. Bechhofer (Eds.).Acquaintance rape: The hidden crime (pp.96–111). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bochow, M. (1997). Schwule Männer und AIDS [Gay men and AIDS]. Bonn: Deutsche AIDSHilfe e.V.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breitenbecher, K. H., & Scarce, M. (1999). A longitudinal evaluation of the effectiveness of a sexual assault education program.Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 14, 459–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bundeszentrale für gesundheitliche Aufklärung (Ed.) (1995). Einfluss neuer gesetzlicher Regelungen auf das Verhütungsverhalten Jugendlicher und junger Erwachsener [The influence of new legal regulations on the contraceptive behavior of adolescents and young adults]. Cologne: BZgA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bundeszentrale für gesundheitliche Aufklärung (Ed.) (1996). Sexualität und Kontrazeption aus der Sicht der Jugendlichen und ihrer Eltern. [Sexuality and contraception as seen by adolescents and their parents]. Cologne: BZgA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bundeszentrale fü r gesundheitliche Aufklärung (Ed.) (1998). Sexual-und Verhütungsverhalten 16-bis 24jähriger Jugendlicher und junger Erwachsener [Sexual and contraceptive behavior of 16-to 24-year-old adolescents and young adults]. Cologne: BZgA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byers, S. E. (1996). How well does the traditional sexual script explain sexual coercion? Review of a program of research. In S. E. Byers & L. F. O'sullivan(Eds.), Sexual coercion in dating relationships (pp. 7–25). Binghamton, NY: Haworth Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, L. M. (1998). From girls into women: Scripts for sexuality and romance in Seventeen magazine, 1974–1994. Journal of Sex Research, 35, 158–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coxon, A. (1996). Between the sheets. Sexual diaries and gay men's sex in the era of AIDS. London: Cassell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, L. T. (1998). Perceptions of resistance to unwanted sexual advances. Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality, 10, 43–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gidycz, C., Coble, C. N., Latham, L., & Layman, M. J. (1993). Sexual assault experience in adulthood and prior victimization experiences. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 17, 151–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodchilds, J. D., Zellman, G. L., & Giarrusso, R. (1988). Adolescents and their perceptions of sexual interactions. In A. W. Burgess (Ed.), Rape and sexual assault (Vol. II, pp. 245–270). New York: Garland Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harnish, R. J., Abbey, A., & DeBono, K. G. (1990). Toward an understanding of “the sex game”: The effects of gender and self-monitoring on perceptions of sexuality and likability in initial interactions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 20, 1333–1344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hickson, F. C. I., Davies, P. M., Hunt, A. J., Weatherburn, P., McManus, T. J., & Coxon, A. P. M. (1994). Gay men as victims of nonconsensual sex. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 23, 281–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodge, S., & Canter, D. (1998). Victims and perpetrators of male sexual assault. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 13, 222–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karabatsos, G. (1997). The sexual experiences survey. Interpretation and validity. Journal of Outcome Measurement, 1, 305–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klinkenberg, D., & Rose, S. (1994). Dating scripts of gay men and lesbians. Journal of Homosexuality, 26, 23–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koss, M. P., & Gidycz, C. A. (1985). Sexual experiences survey: Reliability and validity. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53, 422–423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koss, M. P., Gidycz, C. A., & Wisniewski, N. (1987). The scope of rape: Incidence and prevalence of sexual aggression and victimization in a national sample of higher education students. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 162–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koss, M. P., & Oros, C. J. (1982). Sexual experiences survey: A research instrument investigating sexual aggression and victimization. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 50, 455–457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krahé, B. (1998). Sexual aggression among adolescents: Prevalence and predictors in a German sample. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22, 537–554.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krahé, B., Reimer, T., Scheinberger-Olwig, R., & Fritsche, I. (1999). Measuring sexual aggression: The reliability of the Sexual Experiences Survey in a German sample. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 14, 91–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krahé, B., Scheinberger-Olwig, R., & Waizenhöfer, E. (1999). Sexuelle Aggression zwischen Jugendlichen: Eine Prävalenzerhebung mit Ost-West-Vergleich. [Sexual aggression among adolescents: A prevalence study including an East-West comparison]. 'Gewalt in der Gesellschaft,' 30, 165–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krahé, B., Schütze, S., Fritsche, I., & Waizenhöfer, E. (in press). The prevalence of sexual aggression and victimization among homosexual men. Journal of Sex Research.

  • Larimer, M. E., Lydum, A. R., Anderson, B. K., & Turner, A. P. (1999). Male and female recipients of unwanted sexual contact in a college student sample: Prevalence rates, alcohol use, and depression symptoms. Sex Roles, 40, 295–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menard, S. (1995).Applied logistic regression analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metts, S., & Spitzberg, B. H. (1996). Sexual communication in interpersonal contexts: A scriptbased approach. In B. R. Burleson & A. W. Kunkel (Eds.), Communication yearbook 19 (pp. 49–91). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muehlenhard, C. L., & Hollabaugh, L. C. (1988). Do women sometimes say no when they mean yes? The prevalence and correlates of women's token resistance to sex. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 872–879.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muehlenhard, C. L., & McCoy, M. L. (1991). Double standard/double bind: The sexual double standard and women's communications about sex. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 15, 447–461.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muehlenhard, C. L., & Rogers, C. S. (1998). Token resistance to sex. New perspectives on an old stereotype. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22, 443–463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osman, S. L., & Davis, C. M. (1997). Predicting men's perceptions of date rape using the heuristic-systematic model. Journal of Sex Education and Therapy, 22, 25–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'sullivan, L. F., & Allgeier, E. R. (1994). Disassembling a stereotype: Gender differences in the use of token resistance. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 1035–1055.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'sullivan, L. F., & Allgeier, E. R. (1998). Feigning sexual desire: Consenting to unwanted sexual activity in heterosexual dating relationships. Journal of Sex Research, 35, 234–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pan, H. S., Neidig, P. H., & O'Leary, K. D. (1994). Predicting mild and severe husband-towife physical aggression. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62, 975–981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, S., & Frieze, I. H. (1989). Young singles' scripts for a first date.Gender and Society, 3, 258–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, S., & Frieze, I. H. (1993). Young singles' contemporary dating scripts.Sex Roles, 28, 499–509.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shotland, R. L., & Hunter, B. A. (1995). Women's “token resistant” and compliant sexual behaviors are related to uncertain sexual intentions and rape. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 226–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprecher, S., Hatfield, E., Cortese, A., Potapova, E., & Levitskaya, A. (1994). Token resistance to sexual intercourse and consent to unwanted sexual intercourse: College students' dating experiences in three countries. Journal of Sex Research, 31, 125–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waterman, C. K., Dawson, L., & Bologna, M. J. (1989). Sexual coercion in gay male and lesbian relationships: Predictors and implications for support services. Journal of Sex Research, 26, 118–124.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Potsdam, Germany

    Barbara Krahé, Renate Scheinberger-Olwig & Susanne Kolpin

Authors
  1. Barbara Krahé
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Renate Scheinberger-Olwig
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Susanne Kolpin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Krahé, B., Scheinberger-Olwig, R. & Kolpin, S. Ambiguous Communication of Sexual Intentions as a Risk Marker of Sexual Aggression. Sex Roles 42, 313–337 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007080303569

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007080303569

Keywords

Search

Navigation