Skip to main content
Log in

Taxonomy and Philosophy of Names

  • Published:
Biology and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although naming biological clades is a major activity in taxonomy, little attention has been paid to what these names actually refer to. In philosophy, definite descriptions have long been considered equivalent to the meaning of names and biological taxonomy is a scientific application of these ideas. One problem with definite descriptions as the meanings of names is that the name will refer to whatever fits the description rather than the intended individual (clade). Recent proposals for explicit phylogenetic definitions of clade names suffer from similar problems and we argue that clade names cannot be defined since they lack intension. Furthermore we stress the importance of “tree-thinking” for phylogenetic reference to work properly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bryant, H.N.: 1994, 'Comments on the phylogenetic definition of taxon names and conventions regarding the naming of crown clades', Systematic Biology 43, 124–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, H.N.: 1996, 'Explicitness, stability, and universality in the phylogenetic definition and usage of taxon names: a case study of the phylogenetic taxonomy of the Carnivora (Mammalia)', Systematic Biology 45, 174–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Queiroz, K.: 1992, 'Phylogenetic definitions and taxonomic philosophy', Biology and Philosophy 7, 295–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Queiroz, K.: 1994, 'Replacement of an essentialistic perspective on taxonomic definitions as exemplified by the definition of “Mammalia”', Systematic Biology 43, 497–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Queiroz, K.: 1995, 'The definitions of species and clade names: a reply to Ghiselin', Biology and Philosophy 10, 223–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Queiroz, K. and Gauthier, J.: 1990, 'Phylogeny as a central principle in taxonomy: phylogenetic definitions of taxon names', Systematic Zoology 39, 307–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Queiroz, K. and Gauthier, J.: 1992, 'Phylogenetic taxonomy', Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 23, 449–480.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Queiroz, K. and Gauthier, J.: 1994, 'Toward a phylogenetic system of biological nomenclature', Trends in Ecology and Evolution 9, 27–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donnellan, K.S.: 1966, 'Reference and definite descriptions', Philosophical Review 75, 281–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donnellan, K.S.: 1972, 'Proper names and identifying descriptions', in Harman and Davidson (ed.), Semantics and natural language, Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht-Holland, pp. 356–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghiselin, M.T.: 1966, 'On psychologism in the logic of taxonomic controversies', Systematic Zoology 15, 207–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghiselin, M.T.: 1969, The triumph of the Darwinian method, University of California Press.

  • Ghiselin, M.T.: 1974, 'A radical solution to the species problem', Systematic Zoology 23, 536–544.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghiselin, M.T.: 1981, 'Categories, life, and thinking', The Behavioural and Brain Sciences 4, 269–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghiselin, M.T.: 1987, 'Species concepts, individuality, and objectivity', Biology and Philosophy 2, 127–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghiselin, M.T.: 1995, 'Ostensive definitions of the names of species and clades', Biology and Philosophy 10, 219–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, R.: 1983, 'Nemerteans of the Great Barrier Reef 6. Enopla Hoplonemertea (Polystilifera: Reptantia)', Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 78, 73–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennig, W.: 1966, Phylogenetic systematics, University of Illinois Press, Urbana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, D.L.: 1989, The metaphysics of evolution, SUNY Press.

  • Härlin, M.: 1997, 'Tree-thinking and nemertean systematics, with a systematization of the Eureptantia', Hydrobiologia (in Press).

  • Kripke, S.: 1980, Naming and necessity, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J.S.: 1875, A System of Logic, Ratiocinative and Inductive, Being a Connected View of the Principles of Evidence and the Methods of Scientific Investigation, 9th ed., Longmans,Green, Reader and Dyer, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R.J.: 1992, Naming and reference. The link of word to object, Routledge.

  • Putnam, H.: 1975, Mind, language, and reality. Philosophical papers, volume 2, Cambridge University Press.

  • Russell, B.: 1956, 'Lectures on Logical Atomism', in R. C. Marsh (ed), Logic and Knowledge, George Allen & Unwin Ltd., London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schander, C. and Thollesson, M.: 1995, 'Phylogenetic taxonomy – some comments', Zoologica Scripta 24, 263–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J.: 1958, 'Proper names', Mind 67: 166–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundberg, P. and Pleijel, F.: 1994, 'Phylogenetic classification and the definition of taxon names', Zoologica Scripta 23, 19–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L.: 1953, Philosophical investigations, Macmillan, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mikael Härlin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Härlin, M., Sundberg, P. Taxonomy and Philosophy of Names. Biology & Philosophy 13, 233–244 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006583910214

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006583910214

Navigation