Skip to main content
Log in

Surveying CpG methylation at 5′-CCGG in the genomes of rice cultivars

  • Published:
Plant Molecular Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We investigated the CpG methylation status of the sequence CCGG in the rice genome by using methylation-sensitive AFLP and subsequent Southern analyses with the isolated AFLP fragments as probes. CpGs located in single- or low-copy-sequence regions could be grouped into two classes on the basis of their methylation status: methylation status at the class 1 CpG sites was conserved among genetically diverse rice cultivars, whereas cultivar-specific differential methylation was frequently detected among the cultivars at the class 2 CpG sites. The frequency of occurrence of methylation polymorphism between a pair of cultivars was not related to the genetic distance between the two. Through mapping, five class 2 CpG sites were localized on different chromosomes and were not clustered together in the genome. Segregation analysis of the cultivar-specific methylations with their target sites indicated that the differential methylation was stably inherited in a Mendelian fashion over 6 generations, although alterations in the methylation status at the class 2 CpG sites were observed with a low frequency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ashikawa, I., Fukuta, Y., Tamura, K. and Yagi, T. 1999. Application of an AFLP technique that uses non-radioactive fluorescent primers to detection of genetic diversity in Japanese rice cultivars and cloning of DNA sequences derived from an indica genome. Breed. Sci. 49: 225–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banks, J.A. and Fedoroff, N. 1989. Patterns of developmental and heritable change in methylation of the suppressor-mutator transposable element. Dev. Genet. 10: 425–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennetzen, J.L., Schrick, K., Springer, P.S., Brown, W.E. and San Miguel, P. 1994. Active maize genes are unmodified and flanked by diverse classes of modified, highly repetitive DNA. Genome 37: 565–576.

    Google Scholar 

  • Constancia, M., Pickard, B., Kelsey, G. and Reik, W. 1998. Imprinting Mechanisms. Genome Res. 8: 881–900.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cubas, P., Vincent, C. and Coen, E. 1999. An epigenetic mutation responsible for natural variation in floral symmetry. Nature 401: 157–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finnegan, E.J., Peacock, W.J. and Dennis, E.S. 1996. Reduced DNA methylation in Arabidopsis thaliana results in abnormal plant development. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93: 8449–8454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finnegan, E.J., Genger, R.K., Kovac, K., Peacock, W.J. and Dennis, E.S. 1998. DNA methylation and the promotion of flowering by vernalization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95: 5824–5829.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardiner-Garden, M. and Frommer, M. 1987. CpG islands in vertebrate genomes. J. Mol. Biol. 196: 261–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruenbaum, Y., Naveh-Many, T., Cedar, H. and Razin, A. 1981. Sequence specificity of methylation in higher plant DNA. Nature 292: 860–862.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jablonka, E., Goiten, R., Marcus, M. and Cedar, H. 1985. DNA hypomethylation causes an increase in DNase I sensitivity and advance in the timing of replication of the entire X chromosome. Chromosoma 93: 152–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobsen, S.E. and Meyerowitz, E.M. 1997. Hypermethylated SUPERMAN epigenetic alleles in Arabidopsis. Science 277: 1100–1103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kakutani, T., Jeddeloh, J.A., Flowers, S.K., Munakata, K. and Richards, E. 1996. Developmental abnormalities and epimuta-tions associated with DNA hypomethylation mutations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93: 12406–12411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kakutani, T., Munakata, K., Richards, E.J., Hirochika, H. 1999. Meiotically and mitotically stable inheritance of DNA hypomethylation induced by ddm1 mutation of Arabidopsis thaliana. Genetics 151: 831–838.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lander, E.S., Green, P., Abrahamson, J., Barlow, A., Daly, M.J., Lincoln, S.E. and Newburg, lL. 1987. MAPMAKER: an interac-tive computer package for constructing primary genetic linkage maps of experimental and natural populations. Genomics 1: 174–181.a

  • Li, E., Bestor, T.H. and Jaenisch, R. 1992. Targeted mutation of the DNA methyltransferase gene results in embryonic lethality. Cell 69: 915–926.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, S.Y., Sasaki, T. and Yano, M. 1998. Mapping quantitative trait loci controlling seed dormancy and heading date in rice, Oryza sativa L., using backcross inbred lines. Theor. Appl. Genet. 96: 997–1003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lund, G., Messing, J. and Viotti, A. 1995. Endosperm-specific demethylation and activation of specific alleles of alpha-tubulin genes of Zea mays L. Mol. Gen. Genet. 246: 716–722.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messeguer, R., Ganal, M.W., Steffens, J.C. and Tanksley, S.D. 1991. Characterization of the level, target sites and inheritance of cy-tosine methylation in tomato nuclear DNA. Plant. Mol. Biol. 16: 753–770.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, M.G. and Thompson, W.F. 1980. Rapid isolation of high molecular weight plant DNA. Nucl. Acids Res. 8: 4321–4325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabinowicz, P.D., Schutz, K., Dedhia N., Yordan, C., Parnell, L.D., Stein, L., McCombie, W.R. and Martienssen, R.A. 1999. Dif-ferential methylation of genes and retrotransposons facilitates shotgun sequencing of the maize genome. Nature Genet.23: 305–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Razin, A. 1998. CpG methylation, chromatin structure and gene silencing-a three-way connection. EMBO J. 17: 4905–4908.

    Google Scholar 

  • Razin, A. and Cedar, H. 1991. DNA methylation and gene expression. Microbiol. Rev. 55: 451–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reyna-Lopez, G.E., Simpson, J. and Ruiz-Herrera, J. 1997. Differences in DNA methylation patterns are detectable during the dimorphic transition of fungi by amplification restriction polymorphisms. Mol. Gen. Genet. 253: 703–710.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, E.J. 1997. DNA methylation and plant development. Trends Genet. 13: 319–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ronemus, M.J., Galbiati, M., Ticknor, C., Chen, J. and Dellaporta, S.L. 1996. Demethylation-induced developmental pleiotropy in Arabidopsis. Science 273: 654–657.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, V., Motto, M. and Pellegrini, L. 1997. Analysis of the methy-lation pattern of the maize opaque-2 (O2)promoterandin vitro binding studies indicate that the O2 B-Zip protein and other en-dosperm factors can bind to methylated target sequences. J. Biol. Chem. 272: 13758–13765.

    Google Scholar 

  • Triglia, T., Peterson, M.G. and Kemp, D.J. 1988. A procedure for in vitro amplification of DNA segments that lie outside of the boundaries of known sequences. Nucl. Acids Res. 16: 8186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, E.L. 1998. Paramutation of the r1 locus of maize is as-sociated with increased cytosine methylation. Genetics 148: 1973–1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiong, L.Z., Xu, C.G., Saghai Maroof, M.A. and Zhang, Q. 1999. Patterns of cytosine methylation in an elite rice hybrid and its parental lines, detected by a methylation-sensitive amplification polymorphism technique. Mol. Gen. Genet. 261: 439–446.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ashikawa, I. Surveying CpG methylation at 5′-CCGG in the genomes of rice cultivars. Plant Mol Biol 45, 31–39 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006457321781

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006457321781

Navigation