Skip to main content
Log in

Tense And Temporal Semantics

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Tenseless theories of time entail that earlierthan, later than and simultaneous with (i.e.,McTaggart's `B-series') are the only temporalproperties exemplified by events. Such theories oftencome under attack for being unable to satisfactorilyaccount for tensed language. In this essay I arguethat tenseless theories of time are capable of twofeats that critics, such as Quentin Smith, argue arebeyond their grasp: (1) They can coherently explainthe impossibility of translating all tensed sentencesby tenseless counterparts; (2) They can account forcertain obviously valid entailment relations betweentensed sentence types. In analyzing tensed entailmentrelations tenselessly, I favor a date analysis oftensed language over a token-reflexive theory. Theupshot is that tenseless theories of time are notundermined by the linguistic facts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Austin, David F.: 1990, What's the Meaning of 'This'?, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boghossian, P. A.: 1990, 'The Status of Content', Philosophical Review 99, 157–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig, W. L.: 1998, 'McTaggart's Paradox and the Problem of Temporary Intrinsics', Analysis 58, 122–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Einstein, A.: 1961, Relativity: The Special and General Theory, Crown Trade Paperbacks, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, D.: 1989, 'Demonstratives', in J. Almog, J. Perry, and H. Wettstein, (eds), Themes From Kaplan, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kripke, S.: 1980, Naming and Necessity, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D.: 1980, 'Index, Context, and Content', Papers in Philosophical Logic, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCall, S.: 1994, A Model of the Universe, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • McTaggart, J. M. E.: 1921, The Nature of Existence, Vol. 2, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mellor, D. H.: 1981, Real Time, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mellor, D. H.: 1998, Real Time II, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minkowski, H.: 1908, 'Space and Time', in A. Einstein, H. A. Lorentz, H. Minkowski, and H. Weyl (eds), The Principle of Relativity, Dover, New York, 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oaklander, L. N.: 1990, 'The New Tenseless Theory of Time: A Reply to Smith', Philosophical Studies 58, 287–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oaklander, L. N.: 1991, 'A Defense of the New Tenseless Theory of Time', Philosophical Quarterly 41, 26–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oaklander, L. N. and Smith, Q., eds.: 1994, The New Theory of Time, Yale University Press, New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul, L. A.: 1997, 'Truth Conditions of Tensed Sentence Types', Synthese 111, 53–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, J.: 1977, 'Frege on Demonstratives', Philosophical Review 86, 474–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, J.: 1979, 'The Problem of the Essential Indexical', Noûs 13, 3–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, J.: 1988, 'Cognitive Significance and New Theories of Reference', Noûs 22, 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prior, A.: 1967, Past, Present, and Future, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prior, A.: 1970, 'The Notion of the Present', Studium Generale 23, 245–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, H.: 1975, 'The Meaning of “Meaning”', Mind, Language and Reality: Philosophical Papers Volume 2, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W. V. O.: 1960, Word and Object, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B.: 1903, The Principles of Mathematics, Norton, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savitt, S.: 1991, Critical Notice: Paul Horwich, Asymmetries in Time, Canadian Journal of Philosophy 21, 399–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smart, J. J. C.: 1963, Philosophy and Scientific Realism, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smart, J. J. C.: 1980, 'Time and Becoming', in P. van Inwagen (ed.), Time and Cause: Essays Presented to Richard Taylor, D. Reidel, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Q.: 1987, 'Problems with the New Tenseless Theory of Time', Philosophical Studies 52, 371–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Q.: 1988-1989, 'The Logical Structure of the Debate about McTaggart's Paradox', Philosophy Research Archives 24, 371–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Q.: 1990, 'Temporal Indexicals', Erkenntnis 32, 5–25. Page references to the reprint in Oaklander and Smith 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Q.: 1994a, 'Williams's Defense of the New Tenseless Theory of Time', in Oaklander and Smith (eds), pp. 111–4.

  • Smith, Q.: 1994b, 'The Truth Conditions of Tensed Sentences', in Oaklander and Smith (eds), pp. 69–76.

  • Smith, Q.: 1994c, 'Smart and Mellor's New Tenseless Theory of Time: A Reply to Oaklander', in Oaklander and Smith (eds), pp. 83–6.

  • Tooley, M.: 1997, Time, Tense and Causation, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiiliams, C.: 1990, 'The Date Analysis of Tensed Sentences', Australasian Journal of Philosophy 70, 198–203.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mozersky, J.M. Tense And Temporal Semantics. Synthese 124, 257–279 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005268831005

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005268831005

Keywords

Navigation