Abstract
Tenseless theories of time entail that earlierthan, later than and simultaneous with (i.e.,McTaggart's `B-series') are the only temporalproperties exemplified by events. Such theories oftencome under attack for being unable to satisfactorilyaccount for tensed language. In this essay I arguethat tenseless theories of time are capable of twofeats that critics, such as Quentin Smith, argue arebeyond their grasp: (1) They can coherently explainthe impossibility of translating all tensed sentencesby tenseless counterparts; (2) They can account forcertain obviously valid entailment relations betweentensed sentence types. In analyzing tensed entailmentrelations tenselessly, I favor a date analysis oftensed language over a token-reflexive theory. Theupshot is that tenseless theories of time are notundermined by the linguistic facts.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Austin, David F.: 1990, What's the Meaning of 'This'?, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.
Boghossian, P. A.: 1990, 'The Status of Content', Philosophical Review 99, 157–84.
Craig, W. L.: 1998, 'McTaggart's Paradox and the Problem of Temporary Intrinsics', Analysis 58, 122–7.
Einstein, A.: 1961, Relativity: The Special and General Theory, Crown Trade Paperbacks, New York.
Kaplan, D.: 1989, 'Demonstratives', in J. Almog, J. Perry, and H. Wettstein, (eds), Themes From Kaplan, Oxford University Press, New York.
Kripke, S.: 1980, Naming and Necessity, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Lewis, D.: 1980, 'Index, Context, and Content', Papers in Philosophical Logic, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998.
McCall, S.: 1994, A Model of the Universe, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
McTaggart, J. M. E.: 1921, The Nature of Existence, Vol. 2, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Mellor, D. H.: 1981, Real Time, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Mellor, D. H.: 1998, Real Time II, Routledge, London.
Minkowski, H.: 1908, 'Space and Time', in A. Einstein, H. A. Lorentz, H. Minkowski, and H. Weyl (eds), The Principle of Relativity, Dover, New York, 1952.
Oaklander, L. N.: 1990, 'The New Tenseless Theory of Time: A Reply to Smith', Philosophical Studies 58, 287–93.
Oaklander, L. N.: 1991, 'A Defense of the New Tenseless Theory of Time', Philosophical Quarterly 41, 26–38.
Oaklander, L. N. and Smith, Q., eds.: 1994, The New Theory of Time, Yale University Press, New Haven.
Paul, L. A.: 1997, 'Truth Conditions of Tensed Sentence Types', Synthese 111, 53–71.
Perry, J.: 1977, 'Frege on Demonstratives', Philosophical Review 86, 474–97.
Perry, J.: 1979, 'The Problem of the Essential Indexical', Noûs 13, 3–21.
Perry, J.: 1988, 'Cognitive Significance and New Theories of Reference', Noûs 22, 1–18.
Prior, A.: 1967, Past, Present, and Future, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Prior, A.: 1970, 'The Notion of the Present', Studium Generale 23, 245–8.
Putnam, H.: 1975, 'The Meaning of “Meaning”', Mind, Language and Reality: Philosophical Papers Volume 2, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Quine, W. V. O.: 1960, Word and Object, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Russell, B.: 1903, The Principles of Mathematics, Norton, New York.
Savitt, S.: 1991, Critical Notice: Paul Horwich, Asymmetries in Time, Canadian Journal of Philosophy 21, 399–417.
Smart, J. J. C.: 1963, Philosophy and Scientific Realism, Routledge, London.
Smart, J. J. C.: 1980, 'Time and Becoming', in P. van Inwagen (ed.), Time and Cause: Essays Presented to Richard Taylor, D. Reidel, Boston.
Smith, Q.: 1987, 'Problems with the New Tenseless Theory of Time', Philosophical Studies 52, 371–92.
Smith, Q.: 1988-1989, 'The Logical Structure of the Debate about McTaggart's Paradox', Philosophy Research Archives 24, 371–9.
Smith, Q.: 1990, 'Temporal Indexicals', Erkenntnis 32, 5–25. Page references to the reprint in Oaklander and Smith 1994.
Smith, Q.: 1994a, 'Williams's Defense of the New Tenseless Theory of Time', in Oaklander and Smith (eds), pp. 111–4.
Smith, Q.: 1994b, 'The Truth Conditions of Tensed Sentences', in Oaklander and Smith (eds), pp. 69–76.
Smith, Q.: 1994c, 'Smart and Mellor's New Tenseless Theory of Time: A Reply to Oaklander', in Oaklander and Smith (eds), pp. 83–6.
Tooley, M.: 1997, Time, Tense and Causation, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Wiiliams, C.: 1990, 'The Date Analysis of Tensed Sentences', Australasian Journal of Philosophy 70, 198–203.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mozersky, J.M. Tense And Temporal Semantics. Synthese 124, 257–279 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005268831005
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005268831005