Abstract
The paper criticizes standard functionalist arguments for multiple realization. It focuses on arguments in which psychological states are conceived as computational, which is precisely where the multiple realization doctrine has seemed the strongest. It is argued that a type-type identity thesis between computational states and physical states is no less plausible than a multiple realization thesis. The paper also presents, more tentatively, positive arguments for a picture of local reduction.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Block, N.: 1978: ‘Troubles with Functionalism’, in: W. Savage (ed.), Issues in the Foundation of Psychology, Minnesota Studies in Philosophy of Science, Vol. 9, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota. Reprinted in: Block: 1980, pp. 268–305.
Block, N.: 1980, Reading in Philosophy of Psychology, Vol. 1, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
Block, N.: 1990, ‘Can the Mind Change the World?’, in G. Boolos (ed.), Meaning and Method: Essays in Honor of Hilary Putnam, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 137–170.
Churchland, P.M. and P.S. Churchland: 1990, ‘Intertheoretic Reduction: A Neuroscientist's Field Guide’, Seminars the Neuroscience 2, 249–256.
Churchland, P. S.: 1986, Neurophilosophy: Toward a Unified Science of the Mind-Brain, The MIT Press, Cambridge.
Churchland, P. S. and T. J. Sejnowski: 1992, The Computational Brain, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Fodor, J. A.: 1974, ‘Special Sciences, or the Disunity of Science as a Working Hypothesis’, Synthese 28, 97–115.
Fodor, J. A.: 1985, ‘Precis of the Modularity of Mind’, The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 8. Reprinted in J. A. Fodor: 1990, A Theory of Content and Other Essays, The MIT Press, Cambridge, pp. 195–206.
Fodor, J. A.: 1991, ‘After Thoughts: Yin and Yang in the Chinese Room’, in: D. M. Rosenthal (ed.), The Nature of Mind, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 524–525.
Fodor, J. A.: 1994, The Elm and the Expert, The MIT Press, Cambridge.
Kim, J.: 1972, ‘Phenomenal Properties, Psychophysical Laws, and the Identity Theory’, Monist 56, 177–192.
Kim, J.: 1984, ‘Concepts of Supervenience’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 45, 153–176.
Kim, J.: 1989, ‘The Myth of Nonreductive Materialism’, American Philosophical Association Proceedings 63, 31–47.
Kim, J.: 1992, ‘Multiple Realization and the Metaphysics of Reduction’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 52, 1–26.
Kitcher, P.: 1984, ‘1953 and all that: A Tale of Two Sciences’, Philosophical Review 93, 335–373.
Leder, D.: 1985, ‘Troubles with Token Identity’, Philosophical Studies 47, 79–94.
Marr, D.: 1982, Vision, Freeman, San-Francisco.
Pereboom, D. and Kornblith, H.: 1991, ‘The Metaphysics of Irreducibility’, Philosophical Studies 63, 125–145.
Pitowsky, I.: 1996, ‘Laplace's Demon Consults an Oracle: The Computational Complexity of Prediction’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 27, 161–180.
Putnam, H.: 1960, ‘Minds and Machines’, in: S. Hook (ed.), Dimensions of Mind, New York University Press, New York.
Putnam, H.: 1967, ‘The Nature of Mental States’ (originally published as ‘Psychological Predicates’), in: W.H. Capitan and D.D. Merrill (eds.), Art, Mind, and Religion. Reprinted in N. Block: 1980, 223–231.
Putnam, H.: 1975, ‘Philosophy and Our Mental Life’, in: Mind, Language and Reality: Philosophical Papers, Vol. 2. Reprinted in N. Block: 1980, 134–143.
Searle, J. R.: 1980, ‘Minds, Brains and Programs’, The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, 417–424.
Wang, P. P. and U. Bellugi: 1993, ‘Williams Syndrome, Down Syndrome, and Cognitive Neuroscience’, American Journal of Diseases of Children 147, 1246–1251.
Zipser, D. and R. A. Andersen: 1988, ‘A Back-Propagation Programmed Network that Simulates Response Properties of a Subset of Posterior Parietal Neurons’, Nature 331, 679–684.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shagrir, O. Multiple Realization, Computation and the Taxonomy of Psychological States. Synthese 114, 445–461 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005072701509
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005072701509