Abstract
The paper discusses the structure of non-verbal predication, with particular reference to the role of the copula. Differently from the main tenets of contemporary logico-philosophical and linguistic theories, a model of predication is proposed where the verbal component (specifically, tense information) is regarded as central in establishing the syntactic and semantic relation between a predicate and its subject. It is thus possible to recover some of the insights of the pre-Fregean analysis of predication. The proposed solution has a number of significant consequences for the structure to be assigned to non-verbal predication, in particular for the semantics of ‘small clause’ constituents, where the predication is established without the copula.
REFERENCES
Ackrill, J. L.: 1963, Aristotle's Categories and De Interpretatione, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Ackrill, J. L. (ed.): 1987, A New Aristotle Reader, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Bailly, A.: 1846, Grammaire générale et raisonnée de Port-Royal, Paris.
Belardi, W.: 1975, Il linguaggio nella filosofia di Aristotele, Libreria K., Roma.
Benveniste, É.: 1966, Problèmes de linguistique générale, Gallimard, Paris.
Bowers, J.: 1993, ‘The Syntax of Predication’, Linguistic Inquiry 24, 591–656.
Cardinaletti, A. and M. T. Guasti: 1993, ‘Negation in Epistemic Small Clauses’, Probus 5, 39–61.
Cardinaletti, A. and M. T. Guasti (eds.): 1995, Syntax and Semantics. Vol. XXVIII: Small Clauses, Academic Press, New York.
Chomsky, N.: 1981, Lectures on Government and Binding, Foris, Dordrecht.
Chomsky, N.: 1986, Knowledge of Language, its Nature, Origin, and Use, Praeger, New York.
Chomsky, N.: 1995, The Minimalist Program, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Davidson, D.: 1967, ‘The Logical Form of Action Sentences’, in N. Rescher (ed.), The Logic of Decision and Action, University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, pp. 81–95.
Déchaine, R.-M.: 1993, Predicates across Categories, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
De Mauro, T. and A. Thornton: 1985, ‘La predicazione: teoria e applicazione all'italiano’, in Sintassi e morfologia della lingua Italina d'uso: teorie ed applicazioni descrittive, Bulzoni, Roma, pp. 487–519.
De Rijk, L. M.: 1956, Petrus Abaelardus. Dialectica, Van Gorcum, Assen.
Frege, G.: 1986, Collected Papers on Mathematics, Logic, and Philosophy, B. McGuinness (ed.), Blackwell, Oxford.
Geach, P.: 1962, Reference and Generality, Cornell University Press, Ithaca.
Graffi, G.: 1986, ‘Una nota sui concetti di ρ\(\hat \eta \)μα e λόγος in Aristotele’, Athenaeum 74, 91–101.
Guéron, J. and T. Hoekstra: 1995, ‘The Temporal Interpretation of Predication’, in A. Cardinaletti and M. T. Guasti (1995), pp. 77–107.
Heycock, C. B.: 1994, Layers of Predication. The Non-Lexical Syntax of Clauses, Garland, New York.
Higginbotham, J.: 1983, ‘The Logic of Perceptual Reports: an Extensional Alternative to Situation Semantics’, Journal of Philosophy 80, 100–127.
Higginbotham, J.: 1985, ‘On Semantics’, Linguistic Inquiry 16, 547–593
Higginbotham, J.: 1989, ‘Elucidations of Meaning’, Linguistics and Philosophy 12, 465–517.
Hornstein, N.: 1995, Logical Form. From GB to Minimalism, Blackwell, Oxford.
Jespersen, O.: 1924, The Philosophy of Grammar, Allen and Unwin, London.
Jespersen, O.: 1949, A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles. Part III, Syntax, Second Volume, Allen and Unwin, London.
Kahn, C. H.: 1973, The Verb ‘Be’ in Ancient Greek, Reidel, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
Meillet, A.: 1906, ‘La phrase nominale en indo—européen’, Mémoires du la Société de Linguistique de Paris 14, 1–26.
Mill, J. Stuart: 1906, A System of Logic Ratiocinative and Inductive, 8th ed., Longman, London [1st ed. 1843].
Montague, R.: 1973, ‘The Proper Treatment of Quantification in Ordinary English’, in J. Hintikka, J. Moravcsik and P. Suppes (eds.), Approaches to Natural Language, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 221–242.
Moro, A.: 1995, ‘Small Clauses with Predicative Nominals’, in A. Cardinaletti and M. T. Guasti (1995), pp. 109–132.
Moro, A.: 1997, The Raising of Predicates: Predicative Noun Phrases and the Theory of Clause Structure, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Napoli, D. J.: 1989, Predication Theory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Parsons, T.: 1990, Events in the Semantics of English, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Partee, B. H. and M. Rooth: 1983, ‘Generalized Conjunction and Type Ambiguity’, in R. Bäuerle, C. Schwarze and A. von Stechow (eds.), Meaning, Use, and Interpretation of Language, De Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 361–383.
Rothstein, S.: 1983, The Syntactic Form of Predication, Ph.D. dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
Searle, J. R.: 1969, Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language, Cambridge, University Press Cambridge.
Stowell, T.: 1978, ‘What Was There before There Was There’, in D. Farkas (ed.), Papers from the Fourteenth Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society, Chicago, pp. 458–471.
Stowell, T.: 1981, Origins of Phrase Structure, Ph.D. dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
Stowell, T.: 1991, ‘Small Clause Restructuring’, in R. Freidin (ed.), Principles and Parameters in Comparative Grammar, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 182–218.
Strange, S. K.: 1992, Porphyry: On Aristotle Categories, Duckworth, London.
Svenonius, P. A.: 1994, Dependent Nexus. Subordinate Predication Structures in English and the Scandinavian Languages, Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Santa Cruz.
Williams, E.: 1980, ‘Predication’, Linguistic Inquiry 11, 203–238.
Williams, E.: 1983, ‘Against Small Clauses’, Linguistic Inquiry 14, 287–308.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lenci, A. The Structure of Predication. Synthese 114, 233–276 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005068021890
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005068021890