Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

MOLECULAR SHAPE, REDUCTION, EXPLANATION AND APPROXIMATE CONCEPTS

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

REFERENCES

  • Amman, A.: 1993, ‘The Gestalt Problem in Quantum Theory: Generation of Molecular Shape by the Environment', Synthese 97, 124–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, R. S.: 1960, ‘Time-Dependent Measurements and Molecular Structure: Ozone', Reviews of Modern Physics 32, 447–454

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, R. S.: 1980, ‘A Generalized Phenomenology for Small Clusters, However Floppy', in R. G. Woolley (ed.), Quantum Dynamics of Molecules: The New Experimental Challenge to Theorists, Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohm, D. and B. Hiley: 1993, The Undivided Universe: An Ontological Interpretation of Quantum Theory, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Claverie and Diner: 1980, ‘The Concept of Molecular Structure in Quantum Theory: Interpretation Problems', Israel Journal of Chemistry 19, 54–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchland, P.: 1979, Scientific Realism and the Plasticity of Mind, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchland, P. and P. Churchland: 1994, ‘Intertheoretic Reduction: A Neuroscientist's Field Guide', in R. Warner and T. Szubka (eds.), The Mind-Body Problem: A Guide to the Current Debate, Basil Blackwell, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp. 41–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coulson, C.: 1960, ‘Present State of Molecular Structure Calculations', Reviews of Modern Physics 32, 170–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Della Rocca, M.: 1996, ‘Essentialists and Essentialism', Journal of Philosophy 93, 186–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drago, R.: 1977, Physical Methods in Chemistry, W. B. Saunders, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horgan, T. and J. Woodward: 1985, ‘Folk Psychology is Here to Stay', Philosophical Review 94, 197–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, D.: 1976, ‘Informal Aspects of Theory Reduction', in R. S. Cohen et al. (eds.), PSA 1974, Philosophy of Science Association, Dordrecht, pp. 653–670.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, R. I. G.: 1993, ‘Theoretical Explanation', in P. French, T. Uehling and H. Wettstein (eds.), Midwest Studies in Philosophy of Science, Vol. XVIII: Philosophy of Science, University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, Indiana, pp. 132–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, K. R. W.: 1994, ‘Exclusion of Intrinsically Classical Domains and the Problem of Quasiclassical Emergence', Physical Review A50, 1062–1070.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, R.: 1991, ‘Realism about What?', Philosophy of Science 58, 185–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Löwdin, P-O.: 1988, ‘The Mathematical Definition of a Molecule and Molecular Structure', in J. Maruani (ed.), Molecules in Physics, Chemistry and Biology, Vol. II, Kluwer, Boston/Dordrecht, pp. 3–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, E.: 1979, The Structure of Science, 2nd edn., Hackett, Indianapolis, Indiana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nye, M. J.: 1993, From Chemical Philosophy to Theoretical Chemistry: Dynamics of Matter and Dynamics of Disciplines, 1800–1950, University of California Press, Berkeley, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patsakos, G.: 1976, ‘Classical Particles in Quantum Mechanics', American Journal of Physics 44, 158–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauling, L.: 1988 [1970], General Chemistry, 3rd edn., (altered and corrected), Dover, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Primas, H.: 1981, Chemistry, Quantum Mechanics and Reductionism, Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Primas, H.: 1982, ‘Chemistry and Complementarity', Chimia 36, 293–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Primas, H.: 1985, ‘Kann Chemie auf Physik reduziert werden?', Chemie in unserer Zeit 19, 109–119, 160–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Primas, H.: 1990. ‘Mathematical and Philosophical Questions in the Theory of Open and Macroscopic Quantum Systems', in A. Miller (ed.), Sixty-Two Years of Uncertainty, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 233–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey, J.: 1995, ‘Construction by Reduction', Philosophy of Science 62, 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey, J.: (forthcoming), ‘One Philosopher's Perspective on the “Problem” of Molecular Shape', in E. S. Kryachko and J-L. Calais (eds.), Conceptual Trends in Quantum Chemistry, Vol. 3, Kluwer, Boston/Dordrecht.

  • Rosenberg, A.: 1994, Instrumental Biology or the Disunity of Science, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scerri, E.: 1994, ‘Has Quantum Chemistry Been at Least Approximately Reduced to Quantum Mechanics?', in D. Hull, M. Forbes and R. Burian (eds.), PSA 1994, Vol. 1, Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing, Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scerri, E. and L. McIntyre: 1997, ‘The Case for the Philosophy of Chemistry', Synthesethis issue, 213–232.

  • Sutcliffe, B.: 1992, ‘The Chemical Bond and Molecular Structure', Journal of Molecular Structure (Theochem) 259, 29–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trindle, C.: 1980, ‘The Quantum Mechanical View of Molecular Structure and the Shapes of Molecules', Israel Journal of Chemistry 19, 47–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warner, R.: 1994, ‘Introduction', in R. Warner and T. Szubka (eds.), The Mind-Body Problem: A Guide to the Current Debate, Basil Blackwell, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp. 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weininger, S.: 1984, ‘The Molecular Structure Conundrum: Can Classical Chemistry be Reduced to Quantum Chemistry?', Journal of Chemical Education 61, 939–944.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, J.: 1973, ‘From Relativity to Mutability', in J. Mehra (ed.), The Physicist's Conception of Nature, D. Reidel, Boston, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wimsatt, W.: 1995, ‘The Ontology of Complex Systems: Levels of Organization, Perspective, and Causal Thickets', in M. Matthen and R. X. Ware (eds.), Biology and Society, (Canadian Journal of Philosophy, supplementary volume 20), pp. 207–274.

  • Woolley, R.: 1976, ‘Quantum Theory and Molecular Structure', Advances in Physics 25, 27–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolley, R.: 1978, ‘Must a Molecule Have a Shape?', Journal of the American Chemical Society 100, 1073–1078.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolley, R.: 1980, ‘Quantum Mechanical Aspects of the Molecular Structure Hypothesis', Israel Journal of Chemistry 19, 30–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolley, R.: 1982, ‘Natural Optical Activity and the Molecular Hypothesis', Structure and Bonding 52, 1–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolley, R.: 1985, ‘The Molecular Structure Conundrum', Journal of Chemical Education 62, 1082–1084.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolley, R.: 1986, ‘Molecular Shapes and Molecular Structures', Chemical Physics Letters 125, 200–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolley, R.: 1988, ‘Must a Molecule Have a Shape?', New Scientist 120, 53–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolley, R.: 1991, ‘Quantum Chemistry Beyond the Born–Oppenheimer Approximation', Journal of Molecular Structure (Theochem) 230, 17–46.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Philosophy, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, U.S.A.

    Jeffry L. Ramsey

Authors
  1. Jeffry L. Ramsey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ramsey, J.L. MOLECULAR SHAPE, REDUCTION, EXPLANATION AND APPROXIMATE CONCEPTS. Synthese 111, 233–251 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004901931804

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004901931804

Keywords

Search

Navigation