Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluating the potential for farmer and plant breeder collaboration: A case study of farmer maize selection in Oaxaca, Mexico

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Formal plant breeders could contribute much to collaboration with farmers for improving crop varieties for local use. To do so outside researchers must have some understanding of local selection practices and their impact on crop populations in terms of the genetic theory underlying plant breeding. In this research we integrated methods from social and biological sciences to better understand selection and its consequences from farmers' perspectives but based on the concepts used by plant breeders. Among the households we worked with, farmers' selection practices were not always effective yet they understood the reasons for this and had no expectations for response to selection in some traits given the methods available to them. Farmers' statements, practices and genetic perceptions regarding selection and the genetic response of their maize populations to their selection indicate selection objectives different than may be typically assumed, suggesting a role for plant breeder collaboration with farmers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aguilar, J. 1982. Técnicas tradicionales de cultivo. Los libros del maíz. Árbol Editorial, S.A. de C.V., Mexico City.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aquino, P., 1998. Mexico. In: M.L. Morris (Ed.), Maize seed industries in developing countries, pp. 231–250. Lynne Rienner; CIMMYT, Boulder, Colorado; Mexico, D.F.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashby, J.A., 1997. What do we mean by participatory research in agriculture? In: CGIAR Systemwide Project (Eds.), New frontiers in participatory research and gender analysis: proceedings of the international seminar on participatory research and gender analysis for technology development, pp. 15–22. CGIAR Systemwide Project, Cali, Columbia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashby, J.A., T. Gracia, M. del P. Guerrero, C.A. Quirós, J.I. Roa & J.A. Beltrán, 1995. Institutionalizing Farmer Participation in Adaptive Technology Testing with the ‘CIAL’. Network Paper. 57. Agricultural Administration (Research and Extension) Network, Overseas Development Institute, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlin, B., 1992. Ethnobiological Classification: Principles of categorization of plants and animals in traditional societies. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, H.R., 1994. Research Methods in Anthropology. Second ed. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceccarelli, S., 1989. Wide adaptation: How wide? Euphytica 40: 197–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceccarelli, S., E. Bailey, S. Grando & R. Tutwiler, 1997. Decentralized, participatory plant breeding: a link between formal plant breeding and small farmers. In: CGIAR Systemwide Project (Eds.), New frontiers in participatory research and gender analysis: proceedings of the international seminar on participatory research and gender analysis for technology development, pp. 65–74. CGIAR Systemwide Project, Cali, Columbia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, R., A. Pacey & L.-A. Thrupp, 1989. Farmer first: Farmer innovation and agricultural research. Intermediate Technology Publications, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleveland, D.A., D. Soleri & S.E. Smith, 1999. Farmer plant breeding from a biological perspective: Implications for collaborative plant breeding. CIMMYT Economics Working Paper no. 10. CIMMYT, Mexico, D.F., Mexico.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dilley, F.B., 1993. Climate Change and Agricultural Transformation in the Oaxaca Valley, Mexico. Ph. D. Dissertation. The Pennsylvania State University.

  • Eyzaguirre, P. & M. Iwanaga (Eds.), 1996. Participatory Plant Breeding. Proceedings of a workshop on participatory plant breeding, 26-29 July 1995, Wageningen, The Netherlands. International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome.

  • Falconer, D.S., 1989. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. Third ed. Longman Scientific & Technical, Essex, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fountain, M.O. & A.R. Hallauer, 1996. Genetic variation within maize breeding populations. Crop Science 36: 26–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friis-Hansen, E., 1996. The role of local plant genetic resource management in participatory breeding. In: P. Eyzaguirre & M. Iwanaga (Eds.), Participatory Plant Breeding. Proceedings of a workshop on participatory plant breeding, 26-29 July 1995, Wageningen, The Netherlands, pp. 66–76. International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, C.O., 1961. An evaluation of effects of mass selection and seed irradiation with thermal neutrons on yields of corn. Crop Science 1: 241–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomez, F., F. Bueso, R. Reconco, P. Hughes-Hallett, J. Bentley & M. Smith, 1995. Manual de mejoramiento y conservación del maíz criollo con pequeño agricultores. Escuela Agrícola Panamericana Zamorano, Departamento de Agronomía, Centro Internacional de Tecnología de Semillas y Granos, Honduras.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallauer, A.R. & J.B. Miranda, 1988. Quantitative Genetics in Maize Breeding. Second ed. Iowa State University, Ames, IA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joshi, A. & J.R. Witcombe, 1996. Farmer participatory crop improvement. II. Participatory varietal selection, a case study in India. Experimental Agriculture 32: 461–467.

    Google Scholar 

  • Louette, D. & M. Smale, 1998. Farmers' seed selection practices and maize variety characteristics in a traditional Mexican community. Economics Working Paper 98-04. CIMMYT, Mexico, D.F.

    Google Scholar 

  • Louette, D., A. Charrier & J. Berthaud, 1997. In situ conservation of maize in Mexico: genetic diversity and maize seed management in a traditional community. Economic Botany 51: 20–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maurya, D.M., A. Bottrall & J. Farrington, 1988. Improved livelihoods, genetic diversity and farmer participation: a strategy for rice breeding in rainfed areas of India. Experimental Agriculture 24: 311–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, S., G. Manicad & L. Sperling, 1999. Technical and institutional issues in participatory plant breeding-Done from the perspective of farmer plant breeding: A global analysis of issues and of current experience. CGIAR Systemwide Program on Participatory Research and Gender Analysis for Technology Development and Institutional Innovation. Working Document No. 2, March 1999, Cali, Columbia.

  • SEP (Secretaría de Educación PÚblica), 1982. Nuestro maíz-Treinta monografías populares. Consejo Nacional de Fomento Educativo, Secretaría de Educación PÚblica, Tomo 1 y 2. México.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmonds, N.W., 1979. Principles of crop improvement. Longman Group Ltd, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmonds, N.W., 1991. Genetics of horizontal resistance to diseases of crops. Biological Review 66: 189–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soleri, D. & D.A. Cleveland, 1993. Hopi crop diversity and change. Journal of Ethnobiology 13: 203–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soleri, D. & D.A. Cleveland, forthcoming. Farmers' genetic perceptions regarding their crop populations: An example with maize in the Central Valleys of Oaxaca, Mexico. Economic Botany.

  • Soleri, D. & S.E. Smith, n.d. Broad-sense heritability of farmermanaged maize populations in the Central Valleys of Oaxaca, Mexico, and implications for improvement. Manuscript under review.

  • Sthapit, B.R., K.D. Joshi & J.R. Witcombe, 1996. Farmer participatory crop improvement. III. Participatory plant breeding, a case for rice in Nepal. Experimental Agriculture 32: 479–496.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellhausen, E.J., L.M. Roberts, E. Hernández & P.C. Manglesdorf, 1952. Races of Maize in Mexico. English edition of Razas de Maíz en Mexico, 1951 ed. The Bussey Institution of Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weltzien R.E., M.L. Whitaker, H.F.W. Rattunde, M. Dhamotharan & M.M. Anders, 1998. Participatory approaches in pearl millet breeding. In: J. Witcombe, D. Virkm & J. Farrington (Eds.), Seeds of Choice, pp. 143–170. Intermediate Technology Publications, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witcombe, J.R., 1998. Introduction (Participatory Approaches). In: J. Witcombe, D. Virk & J. Farrington (Eds.), Seeds of Choice, pp. 135–141. Intermediate Technology Publications, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witcombe, J.R., A. Joshi, K.D. Joshi & B.R. Sthapit, 1996. Farmer participatory crop improvement. I. Varietal selection and breeding methods and their impact on biodiversity. Experimental Agriculture 32: 445–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Soleri, D., Smith, S.E. & Cleveland, D.A. Evaluating the potential for farmer and plant breeder collaboration: A case study of farmer maize selection in Oaxaca, Mexico. Euphytica 116, 41–57 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004093916939

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004093916939

Navigation