Differences in diagnostic evaluation and clinical outcomes in the care of patients with chest pain based on admitting service: The benefits of a dedicated chest pain unit
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
Chest pain is one of the most common complaints of patients presenting at emergency departments. However, the most appropriate diagnostic evaluation for patients with chest pain but without acute coronary syndrome remains controversial, and differs greatly among institutions and physicians. At our institution, patients with chest pain can be admitted to an internist-run hospitalist service, a private attending service, or a cardiologist-run Chest Pain Unit. The goal of the present study was to compare the management and outcomes of patients admitted with chest pain based on admitting service.
The charts of 750 patients (250 consecutive patients per service) with a discharge diagnosis of chest pain were studied retrospectively.
Patients admitted to the Chest Pain Unit were younger and had a lower prevalence of known coronary artery disease, hypertension, or diabetes, but a similar prevalence of other risk factors compared with the other groups. Sixty percent of the patients in the Chest Pain Unit underwent stress myocardial perfusion imaging as their primary diagnostic modality (vs 22% and 12% of patients in the hospitalist and private services, respectively; P<.001). In contrast, 35% of the patients admitted to the hospitalist service underwent rest echocardiography (vs 8% and 17% of patients in the Chest Pain Unit and private services, respectively; P<.001). Finally, 47% of the patients in the private service underwent coronary angiography as their primary diagnostic modality (vs 6% and 10% of patients in the Chest Pain Unit and hospitalist services, respectively; P<.001). The length of stay was shortest for patients in the Chest Pain Unit (1.4±1.2 days vs 3.9±3.4 days and 3.5±3.6 days in the hospitalist and private services, respectively; P<.001), even when corrected for patient age and number of risk factors. Readmission within 6 months was lowest for patients in the Chest Pain Unit (4.4% vs 17.6% and 15.2% in the hospitalist and private services, respectively; P<.001).
The results of this study demonstrate that a highly protocolized chest pain unit, using myocardial perfusion imaging as primary diagnostic modality, results in a decreased length of stay and readmission rate.
- Bassan R. Chest pain units: a modern way of managing patients with chest pain in the emergency department. Arq Bras Cardiol 2002;79:196–209.
- Shoyeb A, Bokhari S, Sullivan J, Hurley E, Miesner B, Pia R, et al. Value of definitive diagnostic testing in the evaluation of patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain. Am J Cardiol 2003;91:1410–4. CrossRef
- Krumholz HM, Anderson JL, Brooks NH, Fesmire FM, Lambrew CT, Landrum MB, et al. American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Performance Measures. Writing Committee to Develop Performance Measures on ST-Elevation and Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction. ACC/AHA clinical performance measures for adults with ST-elevation and non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Performance Measures. Circulation 2006;113:732–61. CrossRef
- Antman EM, Anbe DT, Armstrong PW, Bates ER, Green LA, Hand M, et al. American College of Cardiology American Heart Association. Canadian Cardiovascular Society. ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction—executive summary. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44:671–719. CrossRef
- Patel MR, Chen AY, Peterson ED, Newby LK, Pollack CV Jr, Brindis RG, et al. Prevalence, predictors, and outcomes of patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and insignificant coronary artery disease: results from the Can Rapid Risk Stratification of Unstable Angina Patients Suppress Adverse Outcomes With Early Implementation of the ACC/AHA Guidelines (CRUSADE) Initiative. Am Heart J 2006;152:641–7. CrossRef
- Cohen MG, Roe MT, Mulgund J, Peterson ED, Sonel AF, Menon V, et al. Clinical characteristics, process of care, and outcomes of Hispanic patients presenting with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: results from Can Rapid Risk Stratification of Unstable Angina Patients Suppress Adverse Outcomes With Early Implementation of the ACC/AHA Guidelines (CRUSADE). Am Heart J 2006;152:110–7. CrossRef
- Gibbons RJ, Balady GJ, Bocker JT, Chaitman BR, Fleicher GF, Froelicher VF, et al. American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for exercise testing: summary article. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;40:1531–40. CrossRef
- American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on the Management of Patients with Unstable Angina). ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina and non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction: executive summary and recommendations. Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent 2000;51:505–21. CrossRef
- Heller GV, Stowers SA, Hendel RC, Herman SD, Daher E, Ahlberg AW, et al. Clinical value of acute rest technetium-99m tetrofosmin tomographic myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with acute chest pain and nondiagnostic electrocardiograms. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998;31:1011–7. CrossRef
- Hilton TC, Thompson RC, Williams HJ, Saylors R, Fulmer H, Stowers SA. Technetium-99m sestamibi myocardial perfusion imaging in the emergency room evaluation of chest pain. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994;23:1016–22.
- Kontos MC, Kurdziel K, McQueen R, Arrowood JA, Jesse RL, Ornato JP, et al. Comparison of 2-dimensional echocardiography and myocardial perfusion imaging for diagnosing myocardial infarction in emergency department patients. Am Heart J 2002; 143:659–67. CrossRef
- Mikhail MG, Smith FA, Gray M, Britton C, Frederiksen SM. Cost-effectiveness of mandatory stress testing in chest pain center patients. Ann Emerg Med 1997;29:88–98. CrossRef
- Biviano A, Bergmann SR, Tenenbaum J, Sullivan J, Hurley E. Giglio J, et al. Design of a comprehensive chest pain initiative in an academic urban hospital. Crit Pathways Cardiol 2003;2:113–7.
- Raggi P, Callister TQ, Cooil B, Russo DJ, Lippolis NJ, Patterson RE. Evaluation of chest pain in patients with low to intermediate pretest probability of coronary artery disease by electron beam computed tomography. Am J Cardiol 2000;85:283–8. CrossRef
- Tatum JL, Jesse RL, Kontos MC, Nicholson CS, Schmidt KL, Roberts CS, et al. Comprehensive strategy for the evaluation and triage of the chest pain patient. Ann Emerg Med 1997;29:116–25. CrossRef
- Udelson JE, Beshansky JR, Ballin DS, Feldman JA, Griffith JL, Handler J, et al. Myocardial perfusion imaging for evaluation and triage of patients with suspected acute cardiac ischemia: a randomized control trial. JAMA 2002;288:2693–700. CrossRef
- Varetto T, Cantalupi D, Altieri A, Orlandi C. Emergency room technetium-99m sestamibi imaging to rule out acute myocardial events in patients with nondiagnostic electrocardiograms. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993;22:1804–8. CrossRef
- Gomez MA, Anderson JL, Karagounis LA, Muhlestein JB, Mooers FB. An emergency department-based protocol for rapidly ruling out myocardial ischemia reduces hospital time and expense: result of a randomized study (ROMIO). J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;28:25–33. CrossRef
- Bokhari S, Shahzad A, Bergmann SR. Comparison of exercise electrocardiography (ECG) and exercise gated myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD). J Nucl Cardiol 2002;9(Suppl):S18.
- NCEP Expert Panel. Executive summary of the third report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) expert panel on detection, evaluation and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). JAMA 2001;285:2486–97. CrossRef
- deFilippi CR, Rosanio S, Tocchi M, Parmar RJ, Potter MA, Uretsky BF, et al. Randomized comparison of a strategy of predischarge coronary angiography versus exercise testing in low-risk patients in a chest pain unit: in hospital and long-term outcomes. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;37:2042–9. CrossRef
- Abbott BG, Abdel-Aziz I, Nagula S, Monico EP, Schriver JA, Wackers FJ. Selective use of single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging in a chest pain center. Am J Cardiol 2001;87:1351–5. CrossRef
- Fesmire FM, Hughes AD, Stout PK, Wojcik JF, Wharton DR. Selective dual nuclear scanning in low-risk patients with chest pain to reliably identify and exclude acute coronary syndromes. Ann Emerg Med 2001;38:207–15. CrossRef
- Kirk JD, Turnipseed S, Lewis WR, Amsterdam EA. Evaluation of chest pain in low risk patients presenting to the emergency department: the role of immediate exercise testing. Ann Emerg Med 1998;32:1–7. CrossRef
- Master J, Sadlofsky J, Bergmann SR. Lack of major adverse events in patients with chest pain waiting for stress testing: implications for an outpatient strategy. J Nucl Med 2005;46:211.
- Nallamothu N, Pancholy SB, Lee KR, Heo J, Iskandrian AS. Impact on exercise single-photon emission computed tomographic thallium imaging on patient management and outcome. J Nucl Cardiol 1995;2:334–8. CrossRef
- Differences in diagnostic evaluation and clinical outcomes in the care of patients with chest pain based on admitting service: The benefits of a dedicated chest pain unit
Journal of Nuclear Cardiology
Volume 15, Issue 2 , pp 186-192
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- Chest pain unit
- coronary artery disease
- myocardial perfusion imaging
- chest pain
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Internal Medicine, Beth Israel Medical Center, 1st Ave at 16th St, 10003, New York, NY
- 2. Division of Cardiology, Beth Israel Medical Center, New York, NY
- 3. Department of Emergency Medicine, Beth Israel Medical Center, New York, NY
- 4. Office of Grants and Research Administration, Beth Israel Medical Center, New York, NY