Abstract
The effect of salt concentration on analyte response using electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) was measured and compared to that predicted by Enke’s equilibrium partitioning model. The model predicts that analyte response will be proportional to concentration and that the response factor will decrease with increasing electrolyte concentration. The measured analyte response is proportional to concentration over four orders of magnitude when the electrolyte concentration is below 10−3 M, as the model predicts. The concentration of excess charge ([Q]) generated by the ESI process increases significantly at 10−3 M ionic concentration, but the response factor decreases at this concentration. Changes in shape of the spray that cause a loss of ion transmission efficiency may be the basis for the decrease in response. An increase in the analyte response factor with increasing electrolyte concentration is observed for electrolyte concentrations below 10−3 M. An explanation for this based on the electrical double layer is proposed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Loo, J. A.; Loo, R. O. In Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry; Cole, R. B., Ed.; Wiley: New York, 1997; pp 385–420.
Crain, P. F. In Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry; Cole, R. B., Ed.; Wiley: New York, 1997; 421–548.
Ohasi, R. In Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry; Cole, R. B., Ed.; Wiley: New York, 1997; 459–498.
Wilm, M.; Mann, M. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. Ion Processes 1994, 136, 167–180.
Emmett, M. R.; Caprioli, R. M. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 1994, 5, 605–613.
Cheng, Z. L.; Siu, K. W. M.; Guevrement, R.; Berman, S. S. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 1992, 3, 281.
Gomez, A.; Tang, K. Phys. Fluids 1994, 6, 404.
Dole, M.; Mack, L. L.; Hines, R. L.; Mobley, R. C.; Ferguson, L. D.; Alice, M. B. J. Chem. Phys. 1968, 49, 2240–2249.
Kebarle, P.; Ho, Y. In Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry; Cole, R. B., Ed.; Wiley: New York, 1997; 3–64.
Iribarne, J. V.; Thompson, B. A. J. Chem. Phys. 1976, 64, 2287–2294.
Tang, L.; Kebarle, P. Anal. Chem. 1991, 63, 2709–2715.
Tang, L.; Kebarle, P. Anal. Chem. 1993, 65, 3654–3668.
Enke, C. G. Anal. Chem. 1997, 69, 4885–4893.
Kebarle, P.; Tang, L. Anal. Chem. 1993, 65, 972A-985A.
Constantopoulos, T. L.; Jackson, G. S.; Enke, C. G. Anal. Chim. Acta, to be published.
Ikonomou, I. G.; Blades, A. T.; Kebarle, P. Anal. Chem. 1991, 63, 1989–1998.
Smith, R. D.; Wahl, J. H.; Goodlett, D. R.; Hofstadler, J. A. Anal. Chem. 1993, 65, 574A-584A.
Constantopoulos, T. L.; Enke, C. G. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom, in preparation.
Bard, A. J.; Faulkner, L. R. Electrochemical Methods; Wiley: New York, 1980.
Fernandez De La Mora, J. F.; Loscertales, I. G. J. Fluid Mech. 1994, 260, 155–184.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Constantopoulos, T.L., Jackson, G.S. & Enke, C.G. Effects of salt concentration on analyte response using electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 10, 625–634 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1044-0305(99)00031-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1044-0305(99)00031-8