Abstract
In What Is Wrong with the West’s Economies, Edmund Phelps adds to the growing self-criticism of economics. He argues that Western economies no longer support “good life” as they are neither inclusive, nor innovative. The “suppression of innovation by vested [corporate] interests” and “repression of potential innovators by families and schools” are responsible for the sorry state of Western economies. He adds that the “failing in the West’s economies is also a failing of [West’s] economics” and calls for “a modern economics that places imagination and creativity at the center of economic life”. I argue that Phelps misdiagnoses the problem. The lack of encouragement to innovation is not the main shortcoming of economics; rather it is a manifestation of deeper problems. Economics can be rejuvenated only when both teachers-cum-researchers and students alike drop their statistical-mathematical glasses and step back into real space and historical time.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The phrase “field economics” is borrowed from Frederick Cooper and Randall Packard quoted in Jerven (2013: 89).
Economics also suffers from another language problem, namely, reliance on word games, where metaphors borrowed from markets are used indiscriminately to recast problems so as to render them amenable to economic analysis. See Gomez and Moore (2006) and Ferraro et al. (2005) who discuss how the misleading use of language has facilitated the entry of economics into the fields of religion and management, respectively. We can add education to this list.
About 3 years ago, a landslide caused by monsoon showers stranded me in a remote town near the India-Myanmar border. A young tribal student leader came on his own to see me. Not long after we had started chatting, without any instigation from my side, he lamented that his grandparents were “backward.” He backed up his claims with long list of features of their alleged backwardness including the lack of familiarity with English. The discourse of (under-)development/backwardness has convinced him and millions of others that there is nothing valuable in their societies and has transformed them into passive recipients of ideas generated in some culturally and ecologically distant “advanced” society.
References
Buchanan, J. M., & Vanberg, V. J. (1991). The market as a creative process. Economics and Philosophy, 7(2), 167–186.
Colander, D., Goldberg, M., Haas, A., Juselius, K., Kirman, A., Lux, T., et al. (2009). The financial crisis and the systemic failure of academic economics. Critical Review, 21(2–3), 249–267.
Douglas, M. (1990). Foreword: No free gifts. In M. Mauss (Ed.), The Gift: The form and reason for exchange in archaic societies (pp. ix–xxiii). London: Routledge.
Ferraro, F., Pfeffer, J., & Sutton, R. I. (2005). Economics language and assumptions: How theories can become self-fulfilling. Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 8–24.
Gambetta, D. (1994). Inscrutable markets. Rationality and Society, 6(3), 353–368.
Gomez, P-Y., & Moore, R. (2006). From strategy of religions to religion of strategy: Comments on Miller’s (2002) “Competitive strategy of religious organizations”. Journal of Management, Spirituality and Religion, 3(3), 199–213.
Hausmann, D. M. (2008). Introduction. The philosophy of economics (pp. 1–38). NY: Cambridge University Press.
Jerven, M. (2013). Poor numbers: How we are misled by African development statistics and what to do about it. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Karpik, L. (2010). Valuing the unique: The economics of singularities. NJ: Princeton University Press.
Krugman, P. (2009). How did economists get it so wrong? The New York Times, September 06.
Nayyar, D. (2013). Catch up: Developing countries in the world economy. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Phelps, E. S. (2006, December 08). Macroeconomics for a modern economy. The Sveriges Riksbank prize in economic sciences lecture. Retrieved February 08, 2016, from http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/economic-sciences/laureates/2006/phelps-lecture.html.
Phelps, E. S. (2015a, August 13). What is wrong with the west’s economies? The New York review of books. Retrieved February 08, 2016, from http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2015/aug/13/what-wrong-wests-economies.
Phelps, E. S. (2015b, October 22). Untitled reply to Wendell Berry. The New York review of books. Retrieved February 08, 2016, from http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2015/oct/22/whats-wrong-economy/.
Root, H. L. (2013). Dynamics among nations: The evolution of legitimacy and development in modern states. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
Rosenbaum, E. F. (2000). What is a market? On the methodology of a contested concept. Review of Social Economy, 58(4), 455–486.
Trautmann, T. R. (2012). Arthashastra: The science of wealth. New Delhi: Penguin India.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
I am grateful to Manfred Holler and Poonam Mehra for comments on various drafts. The usual disclaimer applies.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kumar, V. Economics, an Uncertain Glory. Homo Oecon 33, 321–332 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41412-016-0018-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41412-016-0018-z
Keywords
- Econometrics
- Game theory
- Innovation
- Labour
- Language
- Mathematical models
- Statistics
- Unemployment
- Urbanisation