Abstract
Cell phones are integral to the lives of contemporary university undergraduates in the USA. Observers documented cell phone use in public spaces within or immediately surrounding a large public university campus in the Midwestern USA. Individuals (N = 2013) were monitored from the time they entered a “waiting space,” either a line at a coffee shop or fast food restaurant, a bus stop, or an open area outside of a large lecture hall. Observers recorded whether individuals were using their cell phones when they arrived or began using their phones during the observation, recording the number of seconds between arrival and cell phone use. The majority of individuals (62%) were observed using their cell phones, 32% when they arrived, and 30% initiated use after arrival. The majority (55%) of the latter group initiated use within 10 s of arrival and 80% initiated use within 20 s of arrival. Women were more likely to use their phones than men and individuals engaged in a live conversation were less likely to use their cell phones. There was a weak trend for longer latencies in cell phone use for those in live conversations, although it did not reach statistical significance.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Asselbergs, J., Ruwaard, J., Ejdys, M., Schrader, N., Sijbrandij, M., & Riper, H. (2016). Mobile phone-based unobtrusive ecological momentary assessment of day-to-day mood: an explorative study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 18, e72. doi:10.2196/jmir.5505.
Bittman, M., Brown, J. E., & Wajcman, J. (2009). The cell phone, constant connection and time scarcity in Australia. Social Indicators Research, 93, 229–233. doi:10.1007/s11205-008-9367-8.
Boase, J., & Ling, R. (2013). Measuring mobile phone use: self-report versus log data. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 18, 508–519. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12021.
Cheever, N. A., Rosen, L. D., Carrier, L. M., & Chavez, A. (2014). Out of sight is not out of mind: the impact of restricting wireless mobile device use on anxiety levels among low, moderate and high users. Computers in Human Behavior, 37, 290–297. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.05.002.
Chen, Y.-F., & Katz, J. E. (2009). Extending family to school life: college students’ use of the mobile phone. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 67, 179–191. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2008.09.002.
Festinger, L., Riecken, H. W., & Schachter, S. (1956). When prophecy fails. New York: Harper and Row.
Finkel, J. A., & Kruger, D. J. (2012). Is cell phone use socially contagious? Human Ethology Bulletin, 27, 15–17.
Forgays, D. K., Hyman, I., & Schreiber, J. (2014). Texting everywhere for everything: gender and age differences in cell phone etiquette and use. Computers in Human Behavior, 31, 314–321. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.053.
Geertz, C. (1973). Thick description: toward an interpretive theory of culture. New York: Basic Books.
Katz, J., & Aakhus, M. (2002). Perpetual contact: Mobile communication, private talk, public performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Langdon, K., Farris, S. G., Øverup, C. S., & Zvolensky, M. J. (2016). Associations between anxiety sensitivity, negative affect, and smoking during a self-guided smoking cessation attempt. Nicotine & Tobacco Research., 18, 1188–1195. doi:10.1093/ntr/ntv253.
Lepp, A., Li, J., Barkley, J., & Salehi-Esfahani, S. (2015). Exploring the relationships between college students’ cell phone use, personality and leisure. Computers in Human Behavior, 43, 210–219. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.006.
Pew Research Center. (2015, April 01). The Smartphone Difference: US smartphone use in 2015. Available at: http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/04/01/us-smartphone-use-in-2015/
Roberts, J. A., & David, M. E. (2016). My life has become a major distraction from my cell phone: partner phubbing and relationship satisfaction among romantic partners. Computers in Human Behavior, 541, 34–141. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.058.
Rosen, L. D., Cheever, N. A., & Carrier, L. M. (2012). IDisorder: understanding our obsession with technology and overcoming its hold on us. New York: Palgrave-MacMillian. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.06.006.
Rosen, L. D., Whaling, K., Carrier, L. M., Cheever, N. A., & Rokkum, J. (2013b). The media and technology usage and attitudes scale: an empirical investigation. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 2501–2511. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.06.006.
Rosen, L. D., Whaling, K., Rab, S. A., Carrier, L. M., & Cheever, N. A. (2013a). Is Facebook creating “iDisorders”? The link between clinical symptoms of psychiatric disorders and technology use, attitudes and anxiety. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 1243–1254. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.11.012.
van Kleef, E., van Trijpa, H. C. M., & Luning, P. (2005). Consumer research in the early stages of new product development: a critical review of methods and techniques. Food Quality and Preference, 16, 181–201. doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2004.05.012.
Xie, W., & Newhagen, J. E. (2014). The effects of communication interface proximity on user anxiety for crime alerts received on desktop, laptop, and hand-held devices. Communication Research, 41, 375–403. doi:10.1177/0093650212448670crx.sagepub.com.
Acknowledgements
We thank the University of Michigan’s Undergraduate Research Opportunities Program for partial funding of this project.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval
This project was reviewed prior to data collection by the University of Michigan’s Institutional Review Board for Health Sciences and Behavioral Sciences. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kruger, D.J., Duan, A., Juhasz, D. et al. Cell Phone Use Latency in a Midwestern USA University Population. J. technol. behav. sci. 2, 56–59 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41347-017-0012-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41347-017-0012-8