Skip to main content
Log in

The Emerging Spatial Organization of the Metropolis: Zones of Diversity and Minority Enclaves in Chicago

  • Published:
Spatial Demography Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The rapid growth of Asian and Hispanic populations in urban areas is superceding traditional classifications of neighborhoods (for example as white, transitional, or minority). The “global neighborhood” that includes all groups (white, black, Hispanic and Asian) is one important new category. We examine the emerging spatial pattern of racial/ethnic composition in the Chicago metropolis, documenting an expansion of all-minority neighborhoods in the city and just beyond its borders, a shrinking set of all-white neighborhoods in the outer suburbs, and more diverse neighborhoods including whites mainly in between. The most novel element of this pattern is how large the zone of diversity has become and how far it extends into suburbia, upending the old dichotomy of “chocolate city” and “vanilla suburbs.” In addition to comparing the distance of different kinds of neighborhoods from the urban core, we also analyze their adjacency to neighborhoods of the same type or other types. There is a strong tendency toward spatial clustering of each neighborhood type and also for transitions on the boundaries of clusters either to expand or to contract their territory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Other researchers have experimented with alternative classifications. Wright et al. (2014) classify tracts using three levels of “diversity” (measured with an entropy index) and the identity of the largest racial/ethnic group to create 13 categories. Holloway et al. (2012) reduce these to one category of “highly diverse” tracts, plus four categories of “moderate diversity” tracts and four more categories of “low diversity” tracts defined by their largest racial/ethnic group. Other schemes are implemented by scholars like Ellen et al. (2012), Friedman (2008) and Fasenfast et al. (2006). Regardless of the classification scheme, these studies converge in demonstrating the co-existence of both increasing racial diversity and persistent racial segregation in many metropolitan areas. The principal advantage of our approach is that it explicitly defines which groups are found together in a tract and how that composition changes over time.

  2. We have tried out other standards of adjacency, such as first order or second order contiguity, and from 5 to 42 nearest neighbors. The patterns of the findings remain, though the magnitudes of the odds-ratio change.

References

  • Alba, R., Deane, G., Denton, N., Disha, I., McKenzie, B., & Napierala, J. (2014). The role of immigrant enclaves for Latino residential inequalities. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 40(1), 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alba, R., & Logan, J. R. (1991). Variations on two themes: Racial and ethnic patterns in the attainment of suburban residence. Demography, 28(August), 431–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, E. (1925). The growth of the city. In R. E. Park, E. W. Burgess, & R. D. McKenzie (Eds.), The city (pp. 47–62). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denton, N., & Massey, D. (1991). Patterns of neighborhood transition in a multiethnic world: U.S. metropolitan areas, 1970–1980. Demography, 28, 41–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, O. D., & Duncan, B. (1957). The Negro population of Chicago. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellen, I. G., Horn, K., & O’Regan, K. (2012). Pathways to integration: Examining changes in the prevalence of racially integrated neighborhoods. Cityscape, 14(3), 33–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farley, R. (1970). The changing distribution of negroes within metropolitan areas: The emergence of black suburbs. American Journal of Sociology, 75(4), 512–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farley, R., Schuman, H., Bianchi, S., Colasanto, D., & Hatchett, S. (1978). “Chocolate city, vanilla suburbs:” Will the trend toward racially separate communities continue? Social Science Research, 7(4), 319–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, C. R. (2016). Immigrant suburbanisation and the shifting geographic structure of metropolitan segregation in the United States. Urban Studies, 53(1), 57–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fasenfast, D., Booza, J., & Metzger, K. (2006). Living together: A new look at racial and ethnic integration in metropolitan neighborhoods, 1990–2000. In A. Berube, B. Katz, & R. E. Lang (Eds.), Redefining urban and suburban American: Evidence from Census 2000 (Vol. III, pp. 93–117). Washinton, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, W. H., & Farley, R. (1996). Latino, Asian, and black segregation in US metropolitan areas: Are multiethnic metros different. Demography, 33(1), 35–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, S. (2008). Do declines in residential segregation mean stable neighborhood racial integration in metropolitan America? A research note. Social Science Research, 37, 920–933.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guest, A. M. (1978). Suburban social status: Persistence or evolution? American Sociological Review, 43(2), 251–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, M., & Lee, B. (2010). How diverse are US suburbs? Urban Studies, 47(1), 3–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holloway, S. R., Wright, R., & Ellis, M. (2012). The racially fragmented city? Neighborhood racial segregation and diversity jointly considered. The Professional Geographer, 64(1), 63–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoover, E., & Vernon, R. (1959). Anatomy of a metropolis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, B. A., Iceland, J., & Farrell, C. R. (2014). Is ethnoracial residential integration on the rise? Evidence from metropolitan and micropolitan America since 1980. In J. R. Logan (Ed.), Diversity and disparities: America enters a new century (pp. 415–456). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

  • Lee, B. A., & Wood, P. B. (1991). Is neighborhood racial succession place-specific? Demography, 28(February), 21–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lees, L. (2008). Gentrification and social mixing: Towards an inclusive urban renaissance? Urban Studies, 45, 2449–2470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, W. (1998). Anatomy of a new ethnic settlement: The Chinese ethnoburb in Los Angeles. Urban studies, 35(3), 479–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lichter, D. T., Parisi, D., Taquino, M. C., & Grice, S. Michael. (2010). Residential segregation in new Hispanic destinations: Cities, suburbs, and rural communities compared. Social Science Research, 39(2), 215–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Logan, J. R. (1976). Industrialization and the stratification of cities in suburban regions. American Journal of Sociology, 82(2), 333–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Logan, J. R., Alba, R. D., & Zhang, W. (2002). Immigrant enclaves and ethnic communities in New York and Los Angeles. American Sociological Review, 67(April), 299–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Logan, J. R., & Schneider, M. (1984). Racial segregation and racial change in American suburbs, 1970–1980. American Journal of Sociology, 89(January), 874–888.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Logan, J. R., Zengwang, X., & Stults, B. (2014). Interpolating US decennial census tract data from as early as 1970 to 2010: A longitudinal tract database. The Professional Geographer, 66(3), 412–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Logan, J. R., & Zhang, C. (2010). Global neighborhoods: Paths to diversity in the immigrant metropolis. American Journal of Sociology, 115, 1069–1109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Logan, J. R., Zhang, W., & Chunyu, M. (2015). Emergent Ghettos: Black neighborhoods in New York and Chicago, 1880–1940. American Journal of Sociology, 120(4), 1055–1094.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D. S., & Denton, N. A. (1985). Spatial assimilation as a socioeconomic outcome. American Sociological Review, 50, 94–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D., & Denton, N. (1993). American apartheid. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D. S., & Mullan, B. P. (1984). Processes of Hispanic and black spatial assimilation. American journal of Sociology, 89(4), 836–873.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moran, P. A. P. (1950). Notes on continuous stochastic phenomena. Biometrika, 37(1), 17–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parisi, D., Lichter, D. T., & Taquino, M. C. (2015). The buffering hypothesis: Growing diversity and declining Black–White Segregation in America’s cities, suburbs, and small towns? Sociological Science, 2, 125–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rey, S. J. (2001). Spatial empirics for economic growth and convergence. Geographical Analysis, 33(3), 195–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R. J. (2012). Great American city: Chicago and the enduring neighborhood effect. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, M., & Logan, J. R. (1982). Suburban racial segregation and Black access to local public resources. Social Science Quarterly, 63(4), 762–770.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnore, L. F. (1964). Urban structure and suburban selectivity. Demography, 1(1), 164–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, N. (1996). The new urban frontier: Gentrification and the Revanchist City. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taeuber, K., & Taeuber, A. F. (1965). Negroes in cities. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, R., Ellis, M., & Holloway, S. (2014). Neighbourhood racial diversity and White residential segregation in the United States. In C. Lloyd, I. Shuttleworth, & D. Wong (Eds.), Social-spatial segregation: Concepts, processes and outcomes (pp. 111–134). Bristol: Policy Press.

  • Zhang, W., & Logan, J. R. (2016). Global neighborhoods: Beyond the multiethnic metropolis. Demography, 53, 1933–1953. doi:10.1007/s13524-016-0516-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, M. (2010). Chinatown: The socioeconomic potential of an urban enclave. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.

  • Zhou, M., & Logan, J. R. (1989). Returns on human capital in ethnic enclaves: New York City’s Chinatown. American Sociological Review, 54(5), 809–820.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, M., Tseng, Y.-F., & Kim, R. (2008). Rethinking residential assimilation: The case of a Chinese ethnoburb in the San Gabriel Valley. California. Amerasia Journal, 34(3), 53–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was partially supported by the US2010 Project with funding from the Russell Sage Foundation. General infrastructure support was provided by Spatial Structures in the Social Sciences (S4) and by the Population Studies and Training Center, Brown University (R24 HD041020).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wenquan Zhang.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 6.

Table 6 Average neighborhood group composition in Chicago, 1980 and 2010

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, W., Logan, J.R. The Emerging Spatial Organization of the Metropolis: Zones of Diversity and Minority Enclaves in Chicago. Spat Demogr 5, 99–122 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40980-017-0033-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40980-017-0033-0

Keywords

Navigation