Skip to main content
Log in

Experimentally Inducing Disgust Reduces Desire for Short-Term Mating

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Evolutionary Psychological Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Short-term mating strategies involve casual sex, multiple partners, and short-time intervals before initiating intercourse. Such strategies should be difficult to implement in the presence of high levels of sexual disgust. Researchers have therefore suggested—and found evidence for—the hypothesis that individuals with a stronger proclivity for short-term mating have lower levels of sexual disgust. Here, we suggest a related hypothesis: inducing sexual disgust should reduce desire for short-term mating. Experiment 1 (N = 341) and experiment 2 (N = 361) investigated the effects of disgust induction on desire for short-term mating. Both studies found that inducing disgust reduces desire for short-term mating, and that the effect of sexual disgust is particularly strong. These results support the novel hypothesis advanced here and corroborate the broader hypothesis that reduced sexual disgust is a previously undiscovered design feature of short-term mating strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Al-Shawaf, L., & Lewis, D. M. (2013). Exposed intestines and contaminated cooks: Sex, stress, & satiation predict disgust sensitivity. Personality and Individual Differences, 54(6), 698–702.

  • Al-Shawaf, L., Conroy-Beam, D., Asao, K., & Buss, D. M. (2015a). Human emotions: An evolutionary psychological perspective. Emotion Review, 8, 173–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073914565518.

  • Al-Shawaf, L., Lewis, D. M. G., Alley, T. R., & Buss, D. M. (2015b). Mating strategy, disgust, and food neophobia. Appetite, 85, 30–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Shawaf, L., Lewis, D. M. G., & Buss, D. M. (2015c). Disgust and mating strategy. Evolution and Human Behavior, 36(3), 199–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Shawaf, L., Lewis, D. M., & Buss, D. M. (2018). Sex differences in disgust: Why are women more easily disgusted than men? Emotion Review, 10(2), 149–160.

  • Ariely, D., & Loewenstein, G. (2006). The heat of the moment: the effect of sexual arousal on sexual decision making. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 19(2), 87–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borg, C., & de Jong, P. J. (2012). Feelings of disgust and disgust-induced avoidance weaken following induced sexual arousal in women. PLoS One, 7(9), e44111. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0044111.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Burnham, T. C., Chapman, J. F., Gray, P. B., McIntyre, M. H., Lipson, S. F., & Ellison, P. T. (2003). Men in committed, romantic relationships have lower testosterone. Hormones and Behavior, 44(2), 119–122.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M. (2015). Evolutionary psychology: the new science of the mind, 5th Edition. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

  • Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: an evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100(2), 204–232.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M., & Greiling, H. (1999). Adaptive individual differences. Journal of Personality, 67(2), 209–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curtis, V. A., Aunger, R., & Rabie, T. (2004). Evidence that disgust evolved to protect from risk of disease. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 271, 131–133. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2003.0144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curtis, V., De Barra, M., & Aunger, R. (2011). Disgust as an adaptive system for disease avoidance behaviour. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 366(1563), 389–401.

  • DeBruine, L. M., Jones, B. C., Tybur, J. M., Lieberman, D., & Griskevicius, V. (2010). Women’s preferences for masculinity in male faces are predicted by pathogen disgust, but not by moral or sexual disgust. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31(1), 69–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Jong, P. J., van Overveld, M., Schultz, W. W., Peters, M. L., & Buwalda, F. M. (2009). Disgust and contamination sensitivity in vaginismus and dyspareunia. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38(2), 244–252.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • de Jong, P. J., van Lankveld, J., Elgersma, H. J., & Borg, C. (2010). Disgust and sexual problems–Theoretical conceptualization and case illustrations. International Journal of Cognitive Therapy, 3(1), 23–39.

  • de Jong, P. J., van Overveld, M., & Borg, C. (2013). Giving in to arousal or staying stuck in disgust? Disgust-based mechanisms in sex and sexual dysfunction. Journal of Sex Research, 50(3–4), 247–262.

  • Fessler, D. M., Pillsworth, E. G., & Flamson, T. J. (2004). Angry men and disgusted women: an evolutionary approach to the influence of emotions on risk taking. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 95(1), 107–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleischman, D. S., Hamilton, L. D., Fessler, D. M., & Meston, C. M. (2015). Disgust versus lust: exploring the interactions of disgust and fear with sexual arousal in women. PLoS One, 10(6), e0118151.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gettler, L. T., McDade, T. W., Feranil, A. B., & Kuzawa, C. W. (2011). Longitudinal evidence that fatherhood decreases testosterone in human males. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(39), 16194–16199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glasman, L. R., & Albarracin, D. (2006). Forming attitudes that predict future behavior: a meta-analysis of the attitude-behavior relation. Psychological Bulletin, 132(5), 778–822.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Haidt, J., McCauley, C., & Rozin, P. (1994). Individual differences in sensitivity to disgust: a scale sampling seven domains of disgust elicitors. Personality and Individual Differences, 16(5), 701–713. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(94)90212-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, B. C., Feinberg, D. R., Watkins, C. D., Fincher, C. L., Little, A. C., & DeBruine, L. M. (2013). Pathogen disgust predicts women’s preferences for masculinity in men’s voices, faces, and bodies. Behavioral Ecology, 24(2), 373–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, A. J., Dubbs, S. L., Von Hippel, W., Brooks, R. C., & Zietsch, B. P. (2014). A multivariate approach to human mate preferences. Evolution and Human Behavior, 35(3), 193–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lippa, R. A. (2009). Sex differences in sex drive, sociosexuality, and height across 53 nations: testing evolutionary and social structural theories. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38, 631–651.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Little, A. C., DeBruine, L. M., & Jones, B. C. (2011). Exposure to visual cues of pathogen contagion changes preferences for masculinity and symmetry in opposite-sex faces. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 278(1714), 2032–2039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazur, A., & Michalek, J. (1998). Marriage, divorce, and male testosterone. Social Forces, 77(1), 315–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre, M., Gangestad, S. W., Gray, P. B., Chapman, J. F., Burnham, T. C., O'Rourke, M. T., & Thornhill, R. (2006). Romantic involvement often reduces men’s testosterone levels–but not always: the moderating role of extrapair sexual interest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(4), 642–651.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mortensen, C. R., Becker, D. V., Ackerman, J. M., Neuberg, S. L., & Kenrick, D. T. (2010). Infection breeds reticence: the effects of disease salience on self-perceptions of personality and behavioral avoidance tendencies. Psychological Science, 21(3), 440–447.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention (2011). 10 ways STDs impact women differently from men. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

  • O’Shea, K.J., DeBruine, L.M., & Jones, B.C. (in press). Further evidence for associations between short-term mating strategy and sexual disgust. Personality and Individual Differences.

  • Penke, L., & Asendorpf, J. B. (2008). Beyond global sociosexual orientations: a more differentiated look at sociosexuality and its effects on courtship and romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(5), 1113–1135.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pliner, P., & Hobden, K. (1992). Development of a scale to measure the trait of food neophobia in humans. Appetite, 19, 105–120.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schaller, M., Miller, G. E., Gervais, W. M., Yager, S., & Chen, E. (2010). Mere visual perception of other people’s disease symptoms facilitates a more aggressive immune response. Psychological Science, 21, 649–652. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610368064.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schaller, M., & Murray, D. R. (2008). Pathogens, personality, and culture: disease prevalence predicts worldwide variability in sociosexuality, extraversion, and openness to experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(1), 212–221.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, D. P. (2005). Sociosexuality from Argentina to Zimbabwe: A 48-nation study of sex, culture, and strategies of human mating. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28(02), 247–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, D. P. (2003). Universal sex differences in the desire for sexual variety: tests from 52 nations, 6 continents, and 13 islands. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(1), 85–104.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, R. J., Case, T. I., & Oaten, M. J. (2011). Effect of self-reported sexual arousal on responses to sex-related and non-sex-related disgust cues. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40(1), 79–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tybur, J. M., & Gangestad, S. W. (2011). Mate preferences and infectious disease: theoretical considerations and evidence in humans. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 366(1583), 3375–3388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tybur, J. M., Lieberman, D., & Griskevicius, V. (2009). Microbes, mating, and morality: Individual differences in three functional domains of disgust. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 103–122. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0015474.

  • Tybur, J. M., Lieberman, D., Kurzban, R., & DeScioli, P. (2012). Disgust: evolved function and structure. Psychological Review, 120, 65–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tybur, J. M., Bryan, A. D., Magnan, R. E., & Hooper, A. E. C. (2011). Smells like safe sex: olfactory pathogen primes increase intentions to use condoms. Psychological Science, 22(4), 478–480.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laith Al-Shawaf.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Al-Shawaf, L., Lewis, D.M.G., Ghossainy, M.E. et al. Experimentally Inducing Disgust Reduces Desire for Short-Term Mating. Evolutionary Psychological Science 5, 267–275 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-018-0179-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-018-0179-z

Keywords

Navigation