Skip to main content
Log in

Women who are Interested in Cosmetic Surgery Want it all: the Association between Considering Cosmetic Surgery and women’s Mate Preferences

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A body of research has investigated different psychological aspects of interest in cosmetic surgery in women. In the current study, we examined the association between interest in undergoing cosmetic surgery and mate preferences in young women. Considering previous work, we hypothesized that interest in cosmetic surgery—as a costly self-promoting behavior in intrasexual competition—would be positively associated with preference for desirable traits in potential mates. Correlational analysis suggested that interest in cosmetic surgery was positively associated with preference for Status/Resources, Attractiveness/Sexuality, and Education/Intelligence in choosing a long-term romantic partner. The correlation between interest in cosmetic surgery and Kindness/Dependability dimension was positive, yet did not reach statistical significance. Findings suggest that women who are more interested in cosmetic surgery set higher standards in long-term mating preferences. Therefore, the hypothesis was supported. Results of the current study are explained in the light of evolutionary approach on intrasexual competition in mating market. Limitations are noted and future directions are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andersson, S. (1994). Sexual selection. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnocky, S., & Piché, T. (2014). Cosmetic surgery as intrasexual competition: the mediating role of social comparison. Psychology, 5, 1197–1205. doi:10.4236/psych.2014.510132.

  • Arnocky, S., Sunderani, S., Miller, J. L., & Vaillancourt, T. (2012). Jealousy mediates the relationship between attractiveness comparison and females' indirect aggression. Personal Relationships, 19, 290–303. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2011.01362.x.

  • Arnocky, S., Perilloux, C., Cloud, J. M., Bird, B. M., & Thomas, K. (2016). Envy mediates the link between social comparison and appearance enhancement in women. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 2, 71–83. doi:10.1007/s40806-015-0037-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atari, M., & Chegeni, R. (2017). The dark triad and long-term mate preferences in Iranian women. Personality and Individual Differences, 104, 333–335. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2016.08.031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atari, M., & Jamali, R. (2016). Dimensions of women’s mate preferences: validation of a mate preference scale in Iran. Evolutionary Psychology, 14, 1–10. doi:10.1177/1474704916651443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atari, M., Jamali, R., Bahrami-Ehsan, H., & Mohammadi, L. (2016). Development and validation of adolescent comparative body and appearance satisfaction scale (ACBASS). Current Psychology, 1–12. doi:10.1007/s12144-016-9452-0.

  • Barber, N. (1995). The evolutionary psychology of physical attractiveness: sexual selection and human morphology. Ethology and Sociobiology, 16, 395–424. doi:10.1016/0162-3095(95)00068-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A., Furnham, A., Glanville, L., & Swami, V. (2007). Factors that affect the likelihood of undergoing cosmetic surgery. Aesthetic Surgery Journal, 27, 501–508. doi:10.1016/j.asj.2007.06.004.

  • Buss, D. M. (1988). From vigilance to violence: tactics of mate retention in American undergraduates. Ethology and Sociobiology, 9, 291–317. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.72.2.346.

  • Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 1–14. doi:10.1017/s0140525x00023992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: an evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204–232. doi:10.1037/0033-295x.100.2.204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M., & Shackelford, T. K. (2008). Attractive women want it all: good genes, economic investment, parenting proclivities, and emotional commitment. Evolutionary Psychology, 6, 134–146. doi:10.1177/147470490800600116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M., Shackelford, T. K., Choe, J., Buunk, B. P., & Dijkstra, P. (2000). Distress about mating rivals. Personal Relationships, 7, 235–243. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2000.tb00014.x.

  • Calogero, R. M., Pina, A., Park, L. E., & Rahemtulla, Z. (2010). Objectification theory predicts college women’s attitudes toward cosmetic surgery. Sex Roles, 63, 32–41. doi:10.1007/s11199-010-9759-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chauhan, N., Warner, J. P., & Adamson, P. A. (2012). Perceived age change after aesthetic facial surgical procedures: quantifying outcomes of aging face surgery. Archives of Facial Plastic Surgery, 14, 258–262. doi:10.1001/archfacial.2011.1561.

  • Chegeni, R., & Atari, M. (2016). The Dark Triad of personality and considering cosmetic surgery: An exploratory study. Journal of Applied Biobehavioral Research. (in press).

  • Dayan, S., Clark, K., & Ho, A. A. (2004). Altering first impressions after facial plastic surgery. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 28, 301–306. doi:10.1007/s00266-004-1017-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delinsky, S. S. (2005). Cosmetic surgery: a common and accepted form of self-improvement? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35, 2012–2028. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2005.tb02207.x.

  • Ebrahimi, A., Motamedi, M. H. K., Shams, A., & Nejadsarvari, N. (2016). Health and social problems of rhinoplasty in Iran. World. Journal of Plastic Surgery, 5, 2–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fales, M. R., Frederick, D. A., Garcia, J. R., Gildersleeve, K. A., Haselton, M. G., & Fisher, H. E. (2016). Mating markets and bargaining hands: mate preferences for attractiveness and resources in two national US studies. Personality and Individual Differences, 88, 78–87. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2015.08.041.

  • Feinberg, D. R., Jones, B. C., Law Smith, M. J., Moore, F. R., DeBruine, L. M., Cornwell, R. E., & Perrett, D. I. (2006). Effects of menstrual cycle and trait estrogen level on masculinity preferences in the human voice. Hormones and Behavior, 49, 215–222. doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2005.07.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feingold, A. (1992). Good-looking people are not what we think. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 304–341. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.111.2.304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fink, B., Klappauf, D., Brewer, G., & Shackelford, T. K. (2014). Female physical characteristics and intra-sexual competition in women. Personality and Individual Differences, 58, 138–141. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2013.10.015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, M. (2004). Female intrasexual competition decreases female facial attractiveness. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 271, S283–S285. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2004.0160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frederick, D. A., & Haselton, M. G. (2007). Why is muscularity sexy? Tests of the fitness indicator hypothesis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1167–1183. doi:10.1177/0146167207303022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frederick, D. A., & Jenkins, B. N. (2015). Height and body mass on the mating market associations with number of sex partners and extra-pair sex among heterosexual men and women aged 18–65. Evolutionary Psychology, 13, 1–14. doi:10.1177/1474704915604563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frederick, D. A., Lever, J., & Peplau, L. A. (2007). Interest in cosmetic surgery and body image: views of men and women across the lifespan. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 120, 1407–1415. doi:10.1097/01.prs.0000279375.26157.64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furnham, A., Mistry, D., & McClelland, A. (2004). The influence of age of the face and the waist to hip ratio on judgements of female attractiveness and traits. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 1171–1185. doi:10.1016/s0191-8869(03)00209-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furnham, A., Petrides, K. V., & Constantinides, A. (2005). The effects of body mass index and waist-to-hip ratio on ratings of female attractiveness, fecundity, and health. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 1823–1834. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2004.11.011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guéguen, N. (2012). Makeup and menstrual cycle: near ovulation, women use more cosmetics. The Psychological Record, 62, 541–548. doi:10.5178/lebs.2012.17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo, S., Salisbury, S., Roche, A. F., Chumela, W. C., & Siervogel, R. M. (1994). Cardiovascular disease risk factor and body composition: a review. Nutrition Research, 14, 1721–1777. doi:10.1016/s0271-5317(05)80327-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haselton, M. G., Mortezaie, M., Pillsworth, E. G., Bleske, A. E., & Frederick, D. A. (2007). Ovulatory shifts in human female ornamentation: near ovulation, women dress to impress. Hormones and Behavior, 51, 40–45. doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2006.07.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson-King, D., & Henderson-King, E. (2005). Acceptance of cosmetic surgery: scale development and validation. Body Image, 2, 137–149. doi:10.1016/j.bodyim.2005.03.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt, P. L., Sherry, S. B., Flett, G. L., & Shick, R. (2003). Perfectionism and cosmetic surgery. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 112, 346. doi:10.1097/01.prs.0000067100.50738.73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jasieńska, G., Ziomkiewicz, A., Ellison, P. T., Lipson, S. F., & Thune, I. (2004). Large breasts and narrow waists indicate high reproductive potential in women. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 271, 1213–1217. doi:10.1098/rspb.2004.2712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalantar-Hormozi, A., Jamali, R., & Atari, M. (2016a). Interest in cosmetic surgery among Iranian women: the role of self-esteem, narcissism, and self-perceived attractiveness. European Journal of Plastic Surgery, 39, 359–364. doi:10.1007/s00238-016-1185-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalantar-Hormozi, A., Maleki, S., Rahimi, A., & Atari, M. (2016b). Sociodemographic characteristics of cosmetic surgery patients in a large clinical sample from Iran. Submitted for publication.

  • Kamble, S., Shackelford, T. K., Pham, M., & Buss, D. M. (2014). Indian mate preferences: continuity, sex differences, and cultural change across a quarter of a century. Personality and Individual Differences, 70, 150–155. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2014.06.024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langlois, J. H., Kalakanis, L., Rubenstein, A. J., Larson, A., Hallam, M., & Smoot, M. (2000). Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 390–423. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.126.3.390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Little, A.C., Burt, D.M., Penton-Voak, I.S., & Perrett, D.I. (2001). Self-perceived attractiveness influences human female preferences for sexual dimorphism and symmetry in male faces. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 268, 39–44. doi:10.1098/rspb.2000.1327

  • Markey, C. N., & Markey, P. M. (2009). Correlates of young women’s interest in obtaining cosmetic surgery. Sex Roles, 61, 158–166. doi:10.1007/s11199-009-9625-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marlowe, F. (1998). The nubility hypothesis: The human breast as an honest signal of residual reproductive value. Human Nature, 9, 263–271. doi:10.1007/s12110-998-1005-2.

  • Marlowe, F., Apicella, C., & Reed, D. (2005). Men's preferences for women's profile waist-to-hip ratio in two societies. Evolution and Human Behavior, 26, 458–468. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2005.07.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marwick, A. (1988). Beauty in history. London: Thames and Hudson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miner, E. J., Starratt, V. G., & Shackelford, T. K. (2009). It's not all about her: Men's mate value and mate retention. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 214–218. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2009.03.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naraghi, M., & Atari, M. (2015). Preliminary findings on gender differences in aesthetic rhinoplasty patients: body appreciation and appearance comparisons. Otolaryngology Open Journal, 1, 7–12. doi:10.17140/otloj-1-103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naraghi, M., & Atari, M. (2016a). Self-esteem and rhinoplasty: a case-control study. Plastic and Aesthetic Research, 3, 111–114. doi:10.20517/2347-9264.2015.103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naraghi, M., & Atari, M. (2016b). Gender differences in aesthetic rhinoplasty patients: a study on psychopathological symptoms. Open Journal of Medical Psychology, 5, 1–6. doi:10.4236/ojmp.2016.51001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naraghi, M., Atari, M., & Asadollahi, H. (2016). When aesthetics, surgery, and psychology meet: aesthetic nasal proportions in patients having rhinoplasty and normal adults. The Surgery Journal, 2, e44–e48. doi:10.1055/s-0036-1579658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicolas, S. C., & Welling, L. L. (2016). Women's acceptance of cosmetic surgery across the menstrual cycle. Personality and Individual Differences . doi:10.1016/j.paid.2016.04.087.Advance online publication

    Google Scholar 

  • Penton-Voak, I. S., Little, A. C., Jones, B. C., Burt, D. M., Tidderman, B. P., & Perrett, D. I. (2003). Female condition influences preferences for sexual dimorphism in faces of male humans (Homo sapiens). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 117, 264–271. doi:10.1037/0735-7036.117.3.264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prokosch, M. D., Coss, R. G., Scheib, J. E., & Blozis, S. A. (2009). Intelligence and mate choice: intelligent men are always appealing. Evolution and Human Behavior, 30, 11–20. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2008.07.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, G. (2006). The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 199–226. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rohrich, R. J. (2000). The increasing popularity of cosmetic surgery procedures: a look at statistics in plastic surgery. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 106, 1363–1366. doi:10.1097/00006534-200011000-00023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, D. (1993). Adaptive significance of female physical attractiveness: role of waist-to-hip ratio. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 293–307. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.65.2.293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, D., & Randall, P. K. (2007). Beauty is in the eye of the plastic surgeon: waist-hip ratio (WHR) and women's attractiveness. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 329–340. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2006.12.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Souza, A. L., Conroy-Beam, D., & Buss, D. M. (2016). Mate preferences in Brazil: evolved desires and cultural evolution over three decades. Personality and Individual Differences, 95, 45–49. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2016.01.053.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swami, V. (2009). Body appreciation, media influence, and weight status predict consideration of cosmetic surgery among female undergraduates. Body Image, 6, 315–317. doi:10.1016/j.bodyim.2009.07.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swami, V., Arteche, A., Chamorro-Premuzic, T., Furnham, A., Stieger, S., Haubner, T., & Voracek, M. (2008). Looking good: factors affecting the likelihood of having cosmetic surgery. European Journal of Plastic Surgery, 30, 211–218. doi:10.1007/s00238-007-0185-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swami, V., Chamorro-Premuzic, T., Bridges, S., & Furnham, A. (2009). Acceptance of cosmetic surgery: personality and individual difference predictors. Body Image, 6, 7–13. doi:10.1016/j.bodyim.2008.09.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, B., Ryckman, R. M., & Gold, J. A. (2013). Competitive orientations and women's acceptance of cosmetic surgery. Psychology, 4, 67–72. doi:10.4236/psych.2013.41009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Udry, J. R., & Eckland, B. K. (1984). Benefits of being attractive: differential payoffs for men and women. Psychological Reports, 54, 47–56. doi:10.2466/pr0.1984.54.1.47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaillancourt, T., & Sharma, A. (2011). Intolerance of sexy peers: intrasexual competition among women. Aggressive Behavior, 37, 569–577. doi:10.1002/ab.20413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammad Atari.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Atari, M., Chegeni, R. & Fathi, L. Women who are Interested in Cosmetic Surgery Want it all: the Association between Considering Cosmetic Surgery and women’s Mate Preferences. Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology 3, 61–70 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40750-016-0053-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40750-016-0053-9

Keywords

Navigation