Skip to main content
Log in

Curriculum Mapping: A Comparative Analysis of Two Medical School Models

  • Monograph
  • Published:
Medical Science Educator Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Curriculum mapping is integral to the curriculum oversight process. The purpose of this monograph is to describe two models for implementing curriculum mapping, which educators may adapt or adopt.

Practical Implementation

The West Virginia University School of Medicine model is characteristic of a decentralized model. Individual course and clerkship directors are responsible for detailing curriculum data. In contrast, Texas A&M utilizes an external software system to centrally manage the curriculum mapping process.

Discussion

Both models are viable strategies to map the medical school curriculum. The databases can provide fundamental information, which can be shared in national databases and leveraged to make informed curriculum changes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hardin, R.M. AMEE Guide No. 21: Curriculum mapping: a tool for transparent and authentic teaching and learning. http://www.al-aarifin.com/images/2001_AMEE_Guide_-_Curriculum_mapping.pdf. Accessed August 10, 2015.

  2. Calloway, C. Curriculum mapping: a shared leadership model. Curriculum Inventory in Context, 2(1), 2015.

  3. Masters, S. Competency mapping across the medical student curriculum. Curriculum Inventory in Context, 2(6), 2015

  4. Daley BB, DM T. Concept maps in medical education: an analytic literature review. Med Educ. 2010;44:440–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Thistlethwaite JE, Forman D, Matthews LR, Rogers GD, Steketee C, Yassine T. Competencies and frameworks in interprofessional education: a comparative analysis. Acad Med. 2014;89(6):869–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Interprofessional Education Collaborative Expert Panel. Core competencies for interprofessional collaborative practice: report of an expert panel. Washington, D.C. 2011.

  7. Pediatrics Milestone Working Group. The Pediatrics Milestone Project. 2012. http://www.acgme.org/acgmeweb/Portals/0/PFAssets/ProgramResources/320_PedsMilestonesProject.pdf. Accessed December 6, 2012.

  8. Association of American Medical Colleges Drafting Panel. Core entrustable physician activities for entering residency (UPDATED). http://www.mededportal.org/icollaborative/resource/887. Accessed August 8 2014.

  9. MedBiquitous Curriculum Inventory Working Group Standardized Vocabulary Subcommittee. Curriculum inventory standardized instructional and assessment methods and resource types (September 2012 version). Washington, DC: Association of American Medical Colleges; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hassan S. Concepts of vertical and horizontal integration as an approach to integrated curriculum. Education in Medicine Journal [serial online]. December 2013:e1, e5. Available from: Academic Search Complete, Ipswich, MA. Accessed August 28, 2015

  11. Walsh K. When I say … triangulation. Med Educ. 2013;47:866.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Komenda, Martin, Daniel Schwartz, Jan Švancara, Christos Vaitsis, Nabil Zary and Ladislav DuŠek. Computers in biology and medicine (impact factor: 1.48). 08/2015; 63:74–82. doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2015.05.006.

  13. Weiss LB, Levison SP. Tools for integrating women’s health into medical education: clinical cases and concept mapping. Acad Med. 2000;75(11):1081–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Scott Cottrell.

Electronic Supplementary Material

ESM 1

(DOCX 25 kb)

ESM 2

(DOCX 28 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cottrell, S., Hedrick, J.S., Lama, A. et al. Curriculum Mapping: A Comparative Analysis of Two Medical School Models. Med.Sci.Educ. 26, 169–174 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-016-0225-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-016-0225-z

Keywords

Navigation