Abstract
The purpose of this study is to analyze the influence of corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities of financial institutions on their consumer responses. It aims to study the association of CSR activities through the customer–company identification. Consumer perception of CSR activities are analyzed in addition to corporate ability and how consumers make trade-off between these two types of association. The direct influence of CSR-based C-C identification on purchase intention is analyzed. A personal survey of banking customers was carried out, resulting in 320 valid responses. In order to comply with research objective and test the hypothesis, a structural equation modeling is used. The result shows the positive empirical validation of the relationship between corporate association and customer–company identification. This theoretical model is tested in the banking sector, so the generalizability is limited to context specific.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allen NJ, Meyer JP (1990) The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. J Occup Psychol 63(1):1–18
Beckmann SC, Christensen AS, Christensen AG (2001) Myths of nature and environmentally responsible behaviors: an exploratory study. In: Proceedings of the 30th European marketing academy conference, Bergen
Belk RW (1998) Possession and the extended self. J Consum Res 15:139–168
Bentler PM (1989) EQS: structural equation program manual, BDMP. Statistical Software, Los Angeles
Bentler PM, Bonnett DG (1980) Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychol Bull 88(3):588–606
Berens G, Van Riel CBM, Van Bruggen GH (2005) Corporate association and consumer product response: the moderating role of corporate brand dominance. J Market 69(3):18–35
Bhattacharya CB, Sen S (2003) Consumer-company identification: a framework for understanding consumers’ relationships with companies. J Mark 67(2):76–88
Bhattacharya CB, Sen S (2004) Doing better at doing good: when, why and how consumers respond to corporate social initiatives. Calif Manag Rev 47(1):9–24
Bouldstridge E, Carrigan M (2000) Do consumer really care about corporate responsibility? Highlighting the attitude–behaviour gap. J Commun Manag 4(4):355–368
Bowen HR (1953) Social Responsibilities of businessman. Harper and Row, New York
Brown TJ, Dacin PA (1997) The company and the product: corporate association and consumer product responses. J Market 61(1):68–84
Brown TJ, Barry TE, Dacin PA, Gunst RF (2005) Spreading the word: investigating antecedents of consumers’ positive word-of-mouth intentions and behaviors in a retailing context. J Acad Market Sci 33(2):123–138
Cardigan M, Attalla A (2001) The myth of the ethical consumer—do ethics matter in purchase behaviour? J Cust Market 18(7):560–578
Carroll AB (1979) A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Acad Market Rev 184(4):497–505
Creyer EH, Ross WT (1997) The influence of firm behavior on purchase intention: do consumers really care about business ethics? J Market Res 14(6):421–432
Dahlsrud A (2006) How corporate social responsibility is defined: an analysis of 37 definitions. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 15(1):1–13
Decker OS (2004) Corporate social responsibility and structural change in financial services. Manag Audit J 19(6):712–728
Dutton JE, Dukerich JM, Harquail CV (1994) Organizational images and member identification. Adm Sci Q 39(2):224–241
Ellemers N, Kortekaas P, Ouwerkerk J (1999) Self-categorisation, commitment to the group and group self-esteem as related but distinct aspects of social identity. Eur J Soc Psychol 29(23):371–389
Esrock SL, Leichty GB (1998) Social responsibility and corporate web pages: self-presentation or agenda setting? Public Relat Rev 24(3):305–319
Fatma M, Rahman Z (2015) Consumer perspective on CSR literature review and future research agenda. Manag Res Rev 38(2):195–216
Fatma M, Rahman Z, Khan I (2014) Multi-item stakeholder based scale to measure CSR in the banking industry. Int Strat Manag Rev 2(1):9–20
Fatma M, Rahman Z, Khan I (2015) Building company reputation and brand equity through CSR: the mediating role of trust. Int J Bank Market 33(6):840–856
Fornell C, Larcker DF (1981) Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. J Market Res 18(3):382–388
Fournier S (1998) Consumers and their brands: developing relationship theory in consumer research. J Consum Res 24(4):343–353
Fullerton G (2003) When does commitment lead to loyalty? J Serv Res 5(4):333–344
Garriga E, Mele D (2004) Corporate social responsibility theories: mapping the territory. J Bus Ethics 53(1–2):51–71
Gatignon H, Xuereb J (1997) Strategic orientation of the firm and new product performance. J Market Res 34(1):77–90
Gatti L, Caruana A, Snehota I (2012) The role of corporate social responsibility, perceived quality and corporate reputation on purchase intention: implications for management. J Brand Manag 20(1):65–76
Geoffery PL (2001) The boundaries of strategic corporate social responsibility. J Consum Market 18(7):595
Gruen T, Summers J, Acito F (2000) Relationship marketing activities, commitment, and membership behaviors in professional associations. J Market 64(3):34–49
Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE (2010) Multivariate data analysis, 7th edn. Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River
Harrison JS, Freeman RE (1999) Stakeholders, social responsibility, and performance: empirical evidence and theoretical perspectives. Acad Manag J 42(5):479–485
He H, Li Y (2011) CSR and service brand: the mediating effect of brand identification and moderating effect of service quality. J Bus Ethics 100(4):673–688
Joreskog K, Sorbom D (2004) LISREL 8: user’s reference guide. Scientific Software International Inc, Lincolnwood
Lichtenstein DR, Drumwright ME, Braig BM (2004) The effect of corporate social responsibility on customers donation to corporate-supported non-profits. J Market 68(4):16–32
Maignan I (2001) Consumer perception of corporate social responsibilities: a cross cultural comparison. J Bus Ethics 30(1):57–72
Marcoulides GA, Schumacker RE (1996) Advanced structural equation modeling: issues and techniques. Lawrence Erlbaum, NJ
Marin L, Ruiz S (2007) “I need you too!” Corporate identity attractiveness for consumers and the role of social responsibility. J Bus Ethics 71(3):245–260
Marin L, Ruiz S, Rubio A (2009) The role of identity salience in the effects of corporate social responsibility on consumer behavior. J Bus Ethics 84(1):65–78
Marquina P, Morales CE (2012) The influence of CSR on purchasing behavior in Peru and Spain. Int Market Rev 29(3):299–312
Marquina PF, Vasquez-Parraga AZ (2013) Consumer social responses to CSR initiatives versus corporate abilities. J Consum Market 30(2):100–111
Matten D, Moon J (2004) “Implicit” and “explicit” CSR: a conceptual framework for understanding CSR in Europe. In: Habisch A, Jonker J, Wegner M, Schmidpeter R (eds) CSR across Europe. Springer, Berlin, pp 335–356
McCracken Grant C (1986) Culture and consumption: a theoretical account of the structure and movement of the cultural meaning of consumer goods. J Consum Res 3(1):71–84
Mohr LA, Webb DJ (2005) The effects of corporate social responsibility and price on consumer responses. J Consum Aff 39(1):121–157
Mohr LA, Webb DJ, Harris KE (2001) Do consumers expect companies to be socially responsible? The impact of corporate social responsibility on buying behavior. J Consum Aff 35(1):45–72
MORI (2000) The first ever European Survey of consumers attitudes towards corporate social responsibility. Research for CSR Europe. MORI, Brussels
Ogrizek M (2002) Forum paper: the effect of corporate social responsibility on the branding of financial services. J Financ Serv Market 6(3):215–228
Pava ML, Krausz J (1996) Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: the paradox of social cost. Quorum Books, Westport
Sen S, Bhattacharya CB (2001) Does doing always lead to doing better? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility. J Market Res 38(2):225–243
Sen S, Bhattacharya CB, Korschun D (2006) The role of corporate social responsibility in strengthen multiple stakeholder relationships: a field experiment. J Acad Market Sci 34(2):158–166
Steenkamp JEM, Van Trijp HCM (1991) The use of LISREL in validating marketing constructs. Int J Res Market 8:283–299
Tian Z, Wang R, Yang W (2011) Consumer responses to corporate social responsibility in China. J Bus Ethics 101(2):197–212
Turban DB, Greening DW (1997) Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness to prospective employees. Acad Manag J 40(3):658–672
Ullman JD (1996) Structural equation modeling. In: Uriel E, Aldas J (eds) Ana´lisis Multivariante Aplicado. Thomson, Madrid
Vaaland TI, Heide M (2005) Corporate social responsiveness: exploring the dynamics of ‘bad episodes”. Eur Manag J 23(5):495–506
Wartick SL, Cochran PL (1985) The evolution of the corporate social performance model. Acad Manag Rev 10(4):758–769
Webster FE Jr (1975) Determining the characteristics of the socially consciousness of consumers. J Consum Market 3(2):188–205
Yoon Y, Gurhan-Canli Z, Bozok B (2006) Drawing inferences about others based on corporate social responsibilities association. J Acad Market Sci 34(2):106–113
Zeithaml V (2000) Service quality, profitability, and the economic worth of consumers: what we know and what we need to learn. J Acad Market Theory 28(1):67–85
Zhou Y, Poon P, Huang G (2012) Corporate ability and corporate social responsibility in a developing country: the role of product involvement. J Glob Market 25:45–56
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
Variable | This company… | Previous studies |
---|---|---|
CSR | ||
Economic responsibility | Maximize profits | Maignan (2001) |
Always improve economic performance | Maignan (2001) | |
Legal responsibility | Make sure that its employees act according to the law | Maignan (2001) |
Always respect the norms when carrying out its activities | Maignan (2001) | |
Ethical responsibility | Respecting ethical principles in its relationships has priority over achieving economic performance | Maignan (2001) |
Has well-defined ethical principles | Maignan (2001) | |
Promotes equal opportunity when hiring employees | Maignan (2001) | |
Philanthropic responsibility | Is concerned with improving the general well-being of society | Maignan (2001) |
Assumes a role in society that goes beyond mere profit generation | Maignan (2001) | |
Directs part of its budget to donation and social work favoring the disadvantaged | Maignan (2001) | |
Identification | I have a positive feeling towards this bank | Ellemers et al. (1999) |
I feel emotionally attached this bank | Fullerton (2003) | |
I feel identified with this bank values | Fullerton (2003) | |
Corporate ability | Has high experience in the industry | Brown and Dacin (1997) |
Offers innovative product and services | Brown and Dacin (1997) | |
Purchase intention | If the price and quality of two products are the same, I would buy from the firm that has a socially responsible reputation | Maignan (2001) |
I would pay more to buy products from companies that show care for the well-being of our society | Maignan (2001) |
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fatma, M., Rahman, Z. & Khan, I. The role of CSR as a determinant of consumer responses in financial sector. Decision 42, 393–401 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40622-015-0108-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40622-015-0108-y