Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Extracellular fluid management and hypertension in urban dwelling versus rural dwelling hemodialysis patients

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Rural-dwelling hemodialysis patients have less frequent contact with nephrologists than urban-dwelling patients, and are known to have higher mortality. We hypothesized that rural-dwelling hemodialysis patients would have more evidence of poorly controlled extracellular fluid volume (ECVF) than otherwise similar urban-dwellers.

Methods

We studied prevalent hemodialysis patients within a single renal program in Alberta, Canada and assessed ECFV using bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS). Our primary outcome was impedance vector length (ohm/m) as assessed by BIS using the Xitron Hydra 4200 device, where shorter vector length indicated poorer ECFV control. Because poor ECFV control can lead to hypertension, we also assessed pre- and post-dialysis blood pressure. We measured outcomes at baseline.

Results

We studied 228 hemodialysis patients, of whom 115 (50.4 %) and 113 (49.6 %) were urban- and rural-dwelling, respectively. There were no differences in volume control in urban versus rural participants; odds ratio (OR) for vector length in the lowest sex-specific quartile of vector length was 0.93 (95 % CI 0.54, 1.59) after adjusting for age, sex, diabetic status, years since dialysis initiation and phase angle. The odds of very poor blood pressure control (pre-dialysis blood pressure ≥180/100) did not differ between urban and rural participants [fully adjusted OR 0.96 (0.36, 2.60)].

Conclusions

Differences in ECFV control do not appear to explain higher mortality among remote- and rural- dwelling hemodialysis patients, compared to urban-dwellers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tonelli M, Manns B, Culleton B et al (2007) Association between proximity to the attending nephrologist and mortality among patients receiving hemodialysis. CMAJ 177(9):1039–1044

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Ho LT, Kushner RF, Schoeller DA, Gudivaka R, Spiegel DM (1994) Bioimpedance analysis of total body water in hemodialysis patients. Kidney Int 46(5):1438–1442

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Jaffrin MY, Fenech M, de Fremont JF, Tolani M (2002) Continuous monitoring of plasma, interstitial, and intracellular fluid volumes in dialyzed patients by bioimpedance and hematocrit measurements. ASAIO J 48(3):326–333

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Matthie J, Zarowitz B, De Lorenzo A et al (1998) Analytic assessment of the various bioimpedance methods used to estimate body water. J Appl Physiol (1985) 84(5):1801–1816

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Basile C, Vernaglione L, Di Iorio B et al (2007) Development and validation of bioimpedance analysis prediction equations for dry weight in hemodialysis patients. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2(4):675–680

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fagugli RM, Pasini P, Quintaliani G et al (2003) Association between extracellular water, left ventricular mass and hypertension in haemodialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant 18(11):2332–2338

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fisch BJ, Spiegel DM (1996) Assessment of excess fluid distribution in chronic hemodialysis patients using bioimpedance spectroscopy. Kidney Int 49(4):1105–1109

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Katzarski K, Charra B, Laurent G et al (1996) Multifrequency bioimpedance in assessment of dry weight in haemodialysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 11(Suppl 2):20–23

    Google Scholar 

  9. Katzarski KS, Charra B, Luik AJ et al (1999) Fluid state and blood pressure control in patients treated with long and short haemodialysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 14(2):369–375

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kraemer M, Rode C, Wizemann V (2006) Detection limit of methods to assess fluid status changes in dialysis patients. Kidney Int 69(9):1609–1620

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lin YP, Yu WC, Hsu TL, Ding PY, Yang WC, Chen CH (2003) The extracellular fluid-to-intracellular fluid volume ratio is associated with large-artery structure and function in hemodialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis 42(5):990–999

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Schneditz D (2006) The arrow of bioimpedance. Kidney Int 69:1492–1493

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhu F, Sarkar S, Kaitwatcharachai C, Greenwood R, Ronco C, Levin NW (2003) Methods and reproducibility of measurement of resistivity in the calf using regional bioimpedance analysis. Blood Purif 21(1):131–136

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. De Lorenzo A, Andreoli A, Matthie J, Withers P (1997) Predicting body cell mass with bioimpedance by using theoretical methods: a technological review. J Appl Physiol (1985) 82(5):1542–1558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Di Iorio B, Bellizzi V (2000) Association of mortality and morbidity with bioimpedance analysis. Kidney Int 58(1):464–465

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Maggiore Q, Nigrelli S, Ciccarelli C, Grimaldi C, Rossi GA, Michelassi C (1996) Nutritional and prognostic correlates of bioimpedance indexes in hemodialysis patients. Kidney Int 50(6):2103–2108

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Pillon L, Piccoli A, Lowrie EG, Lazarus JM, Chertow GM (2004) Vector length as a proxy for the adequacy of ultrafiltration in hemodialysis. Kidney Int 66(3):1266–1271

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Piccoli A (1998) Identification of operational clues to dry weight prescription in hemodialysis using bioimpedance vector analysis. The Italian Hemodialysis-Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (HD-BIA) Study Group. Kidney Int 53(4):1036–1043

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Piccoli A, Pillon L, Tabbi MG (1999) Major confounders for reactance as a marker of malnutrition in hemodialysis patients. Kidney Int 56(6):2311–2312

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Chamney PW, Kramer M, Rode C, Kleinekofort W, Wizemann V (2002) A new technique for establishing dry weight in hemodialysis patients via whole body bioimpedance. Kidney Int 61(6):2250–2258

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. De Vries JP, Bogaard HJ, Kouw PM, Oe LP, Stevens P, De Vries PM (1993) The adjustment of post dialytic dry weight based on non-invasive measurement of extracellular fluid and blood volumes. ASAIO J 39(3):M368–M372

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhu F, Kuhlmann MK, Sarkar S et al (2004) Adjustment of dry weight in hemodialysis patients using intradialytic continuous multifrequency bioimpedance of the calf. Int J Artif Organs 27(2):104–109

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Jindal K, Chan CT, Deziel C et al (2006) Hemodialysis clinical practice guidelines for the Canadian Society of Nephrology. J Am Soc Nephrol 17(3 Suppl 1):S1–S27

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Veugelers PJ, Yip AM (2003) Socioeconomic disparities in health care use: does universal coverage reduce inequalities in health? J Epidemiol Community Health 57(6):424–428

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Permaul-Woods JA, Carroll JC, Reid AJ et al (1999) Going the distance: the influence of practice location on the Ontario Maternal Serum Screening Program. CMAJ 161(4):381–385

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Seidel JE, Ghali WA, Faris PD et al (2004) Geographical location of residence and uniformity of access to cardiac revascularization services after catheterization. Can J Cardiol 20(5):517–523

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Charra B, Chazot C (2003) Volume control, blood pressure and cardiovascular function. Lessons from hemodialysis treatment. Nephron Physiol 93(4):p94–p101

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Charra B, Terrat JC, Vanel T et al (2004) Long thrice weekly hemodialysis: the Tassin experience. Int J Artif Organs 27(4):265–283

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Chazot C, Charra B, Van Vo C et al (1999) The Janus-faced aspect of ‘dry weight’. Nephrol Dial Transplant 14(1):121–124

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Fagugli RM, Pasini P, Pasticci F, Ciao G, Cicconi B, Buoncristiani U (2006) Effects of short daily hemodialysis and extended standard hemodialysis on blood pressure and cardiac hypertrophy: a comparative study. J Nephrol 19(1):77–83

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Gunal AI, Karaca I, Aygen B, Yavuzkir M, Dogukan A, Celiker H (2004) Strict fluid volume control and left ventricular hypertrophy in hypertensive patients on chronic haemodialysis: a cross-sectional study. J Int Med Res 32(1):70–77

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Ozkahya M, Ok E, Cirit M et al (1998) Regression of left ventricular hypertrophy in haemodialysis patients by ultrafiltration and reduced salt intake without antihypertensive drugs. Nephrol Dial Transplant 13(6):1489–1493

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Ozkahya M, Toz H, Qzerkan F et al (2002) Impact of volume control on left ventricular hypertrophy in dialysis patients. J Nephrol 15(6):655–660

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Toprak A, Koc M, Tezcan H, Ozener IC, Akoglu E, Oktay A (2003) Inferior vena cava diameter determines left ventricular geometry in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients: an echocardiographic study. Nephrol Dial Transplant 18(10):2128–2133

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Agarwal R (2005) Hypertension and survival in chronic hemodialysis patients–past lessons and future opportunities. Kidney Int 67(1):1–13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Cannella G, Paoletti E, Ravera G et al (2000) Inadequate diagnosis and therapy of arterial hypertension as causes of left ventricular hypertrophy in uremic dialysis patients. Kidney Int 58(1):260–268

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Charra B, Calemard E, Ruffet M et al (1992) Survival as an index of adequacy of dialysis. Kidney Int 41(5):1286–1291

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Foley RN, Parfrey PS, Harnett JD, Kent GM, Murray DC, Barre PE (1996) Impact of hypertension on cardiomyopathy, morbidity and mortality in end-stage renal disease. Kidney Int 49(5):1379–1385

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Mazzuchi N, Carbonell E, Fernandez-Cean J (2000) Importance of blood pressure control in hemodialysis patient survival. Kidney Int 58(5):2147–2154

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Ritz E, Strumpf C, Katz F, Wing AJ, Quellhorst E (1985) Hypertension and cardiovascular risk factors in hemodialyzed diabetic patients. Hypertension. 7(6 Pt 2):118–124 (II)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Tomita J, Kimura G, Inoue T et al (1995) Role of systolic blood pressure in determining prognosis of hemodialyzed patients. Am J Kidney Dis 25(3):405–412

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Agarwal R, Satyan S, Alborzi P et al (2009) Home blood pressure measurements for managing hypertension in hemodialysis patients. Am J Nephrol 30(2):126–134

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors of this report are grateful to the study coordinators: Nancy Ruholl, Nasreen Ahmad and Lori Piquette; research assistants Yuanchen Liu, Lois Hannam, Brian Nadler, Tim Chan, Evelyn Chan, and Somaya Zahran; and to all of the participants in this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcello Tonelli.

Ethics declarations

Funding

This work was supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tonelli, M., Lloyd, A., Pannu, N. et al. Extracellular fluid management and hypertension in urban dwelling versus rural dwelling hemodialysis patients. J Nephrol 31, 103–110 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40620-016-0337-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40620-016-0337-y

Keywords

Navigation