Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Adherence to phosphate binders in hemodialysis patients: prevalence and determinants

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Phosphate control is a crucial treatment goal in end-stage renal disease, but poor patient adherence to phosphate binder therapy remains a challenge. This study aimed to estimate the extent of phosphate binder adherence in hemodialysis patients and to identify potential determinants.

Methods

Phosphate binder adherence was measured blindly in 135 hemodialysis patients for 2 months using the medication event monitoring system. Patient data, gathered at inclusion through medical records, ad hoc questionnaires and the short form (SF)-36 health survey, included: (1) demographics, (2) perceived side-effects, belief in benefit, self-reported adherence to the therapy, (3) knowledge about phosphate binder therapy, (4) social support, and (5) quality of life (SF-36). Phosphatemia data was collected from charts. ‘Being adherent’ was defined as missing <1 total daily dose/week and ‘being totally adherent’ as missing <1 total daily dose/week, every week.

Results

Mean age of patients was 67 years and 64 % of the sample was male. Over the 2 months, 78 % of the prescribed doses were taken. Every week, about half of patients were adherent. Over the entire 8-week period, 22 % of patients were totally adherent. Mean phosphatemia levels were 0.55 mg/dl lower in adherent than nonadherent patients (4.76 vs. 5.31 mg/dl). Determinants for being totally adherent were living with a partner, higher social support (both were interrelated) and higher physical quality of life. Experiencing intake-related inconvenience negatively affected adherence. The social support and quality of life physical score explained 26 % of the variance in adherence.

Conclusions

Phosphate binder nonadherence remains a major problem. Interventions should aim, at least, to improve social support. With few associated factors found and yet low adherence, an individualized approach seems indicated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Floege J, Kim J, Ireland E et al (2011) Serum iPTH, calcium and phosphate, and the risk of mortality in a European haemodialysis population. Nephrol Dial Transpl 26(6):1948–1955

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Terai K, Nara H, Takakura K et al (2009) Vascular calcification and secondary hyperparathyroidism of severe chronic kidney disease and its relation to serum phosphate and calcium levels. Br J Pharmacol 156(8):1267–1278

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Giachelli CM (2009) The emerging role of phosphate in vascular calcification. Kidney Int 75(9):890–897

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hutchison AJ (2009) Oral phosphate binders. Kidney Int 75(9):906–914

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Vrijens B, De Geest S, Hughes DA et al (2012) A new taxonomy for describing and defining adherence to medications. Br J Clin Pharmacol 73(5):691–705

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Karamanidou C, Clatworthy J, Weinman J, Horne R (2008) A systematic review of the prevalence and determinants of nonadherence to phosphate binding medication in patients with end-stage renal disease. BMC Nephrol 9(2)

  7. Hung KY, Liao SC, Chen TH, Chao MC, Chen JB (2013) Adherence to phosphate binder therapy is the primary determinant of hyperphosphatemia incidence in patients receiving peritoneal dialysis. Ther Apher Dial 17(1):72–77

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Schmid H, Hartmann B, Schiffl H (2009) Adherence to prescribed oral medication in adult patients undergoing chronic hemodialysis: a critical review of the literature. Eur J Med Res 14(5):185–190

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Osterberg L, Blaschke T (2005) Drug therapy—adherence to medication. N Engl J Med 353(5):487–497

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Aaronson NK, Muller M, Cohen PDA et al (1998) Translation, validation, and norming of the Dutch language version of the SF-36 health survey in community and chronic disease populations. J Clin Epidemiol 51(11):1055–1068

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Arenas MD, Malek T, Gil MT, Moledous A, Alvarez-Ude F, Reig-Ferrer A (2010) Challenge of phosphorus control in hemodialysis patients: a problem of adherence? J Nephrol 23(5):525–534

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Pruijm M, Teta D, Halabi G, Wuerzner G, Santschi V, Burnier M (2009) Improvement in secondary hyperparathyroidism due to drug adherence monitoring in dialysis patients. Clin Nephrol 72(3):199–205

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Van Camp YP, Van Rompaey B, Elseviers MM (2013) Nurse-led interventions to enhance adherence to chronic medication: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 69(4):761–770

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hutchison AJ, Laville M, SPDLS Grp (2008) Switching to lanthanum carbonate monotherapy provides effective phosphate control with a low tablet burden. Nephrol Dial Transpl 23(11):3677–3684

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lindberg M, Lindberg P (2008) Overcoming obstacles for adherence to phosphate binding medication in dialysis patients: a qualitative study. Pharm World Sci 30(5):571–576

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wileman V, Chilcot J, Norton S, Hughes L, Wellsted D, Farrington K (2011) Choosing not to take phosphate binders: the role of dialysis patients’ medication beliefs. Nephron Clin Pract 119(3):C205–C213

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Browne T, Merighi JR (2010) Barriers to adult hemodialysis patients’ self-management of oral medications. Am J Kidney Dis 56(3):547–557

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Garcia-Llana H, Remor E, Selgas R (2013) Adherence to treatment, emotional state and quality of life in patients with end-stage renal disease undergoing dialysis. Psicothema 25(1):79–86

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Sincere thanks to Vocatio vzw for acknowledging and supporting the curriculum of Yoleen Van Camp. We greatly appreciate the professional and technical support by MWV Healthcare® and the cooperation of all the participating patients. Many thanks for the efforts of the local study nurses, assisting master students and nephrologists Paul Arnouts, Koen Bouman, Ronald Daelemans, Katja De Grande, Elfie Deprez, Wendy Engelen, Heidi Hoeben, Ann Scheipers, Leen Torremans, Daniël Van Caesbroeck, Ludo Van Doorslaer, Sarina Van Loock, Jeannine Van Loon, Bob Van Santbergen and Sandra Vervynckt.

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yoleen P. M. Van Camp.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Van Camp, Y.P.M., Vrijens, B., Abraham, I. et al. Adherence to phosphate binders in hemodialysis patients: prevalence and determinants. J Nephrol 27, 673–679 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40620-014-0062-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40620-014-0062-3

Keywords

Navigation