Abstract
Background
Phosphate control is a crucial treatment goal in end-stage renal disease, but poor patient adherence to phosphate binder therapy remains a challenge. This study aimed to estimate the extent of phosphate binder adherence in hemodialysis patients and to identify potential determinants.
Methods
Phosphate binder adherence was measured blindly in 135 hemodialysis patients for 2 months using the medication event monitoring system. Patient data, gathered at inclusion through medical records, ad hoc questionnaires and the short form (SF)-36 health survey, included: (1) demographics, (2) perceived side-effects, belief in benefit, self-reported adherence to the therapy, (3) knowledge about phosphate binder therapy, (4) social support, and (5) quality of life (SF-36). Phosphatemia data was collected from charts. ‘Being adherent’ was defined as missing <1 total daily dose/week and ‘being totally adherent’ as missing <1 total daily dose/week, every week.
Results
Mean age of patients was 67 years and 64 % of the sample was male. Over the 2 months, 78 % of the prescribed doses were taken. Every week, about half of patients were adherent. Over the entire 8-week period, 22 % of patients were totally adherent. Mean phosphatemia levels were 0.55 mg/dl lower in adherent than nonadherent patients (4.76 vs. 5.31 mg/dl). Determinants for being totally adherent were living with a partner, higher social support (both were interrelated) and higher physical quality of life. Experiencing intake-related inconvenience negatively affected adherence. The social support and quality of life physical score explained 26 % of the variance in adherence.
Conclusions
Phosphate binder nonadherence remains a major problem. Interventions should aim, at least, to improve social support. With few associated factors found and yet low adherence, an individualized approach seems indicated.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Floege J, Kim J, Ireland E et al (2011) Serum iPTH, calcium and phosphate, and the risk of mortality in a European haemodialysis population. Nephrol Dial Transpl 26(6):1948–1955
Terai K, Nara H, Takakura K et al (2009) Vascular calcification and secondary hyperparathyroidism of severe chronic kidney disease and its relation to serum phosphate and calcium levels. Br J Pharmacol 156(8):1267–1278
Giachelli CM (2009) The emerging role of phosphate in vascular calcification. Kidney Int 75(9):890–897
Hutchison AJ (2009) Oral phosphate binders. Kidney Int 75(9):906–914
Vrijens B, De Geest S, Hughes DA et al (2012) A new taxonomy for describing and defining adherence to medications. Br J Clin Pharmacol 73(5):691–705
Karamanidou C, Clatworthy J, Weinman J, Horne R (2008) A systematic review of the prevalence and determinants of nonadherence to phosphate binding medication in patients with end-stage renal disease. BMC Nephrol 9(2)
Hung KY, Liao SC, Chen TH, Chao MC, Chen JB (2013) Adherence to phosphate binder therapy is the primary determinant of hyperphosphatemia incidence in patients receiving peritoneal dialysis. Ther Apher Dial 17(1):72–77
Schmid H, Hartmann B, Schiffl H (2009) Adherence to prescribed oral medication in adult patients undergoing chronic hemodialysis: a critical review of the literature. Eur J Med Res 14(5):185–190
Osterberg L, Blaschke T (2005) Drug therapy—adherence to medication. N Engl J Med 353(5):487–497
Aaronson NK, Muller M, Cohen PDA et al (1998) Translation, validation, and norming of the Dutch language version of the SF-36 health survey in community and chronic disease populations. J Clin Epidemiol 51(11):1055–1068
Arenas MD, Malek T, Gil MT, Moledous A, Alvarez-Ude F, Reig-Ferrer A (2010) Challenge of phosphorus control in hemodialysis patients: a problem of adherence? J Nephrol 23(5):525–534
Pruijm M, Teta D, Halabi G, Wuerzner G, Santschi V, Burnier M (2009) Improvement in secondary hyperparathyroidism due to drug adherence monitoring in dialysis patients. Clin Nephrol 72(3):199–205
Van Camp YP, Van Rompaey B, Elseviers MM (2013) Nurse-led interventions to enhance adherence to chronic medication: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 69(4):761–770
Hutchison AJ, Laville M, SPDLS Grp (2008) Switching to lanthanum carbonate monotherapy provides effective phosphate control with a low tablet burden. Nephrol Dial Transpl 23(11):3677–3684
Lindberg M, Lindberg P (2008) Overcoming obstacles for adherence to phosphate binding medication in dialysis patients: a qualitative study. Pharm World Sci 30(5):571–576
Wileman V, Chilcot J, Norton S, Hughes L, Wellsted D, Farrington K (2011) Choosing not to take phosphate binders: the role of dialysis patients’ medication beliefs. Nephron Clin Pract 119(3):C205–C213
Browne T, Merighi JR (2010) Barriers to adult hemodialysis patients’ self-management of oral medications. Am J Kidney Dis 56(3):547–557
Garcia-Llana H, Remor E, Selgas R (2013) Adherence to treatment, emotional state and quality of life in patients with end-stage renal disease undergoing dialysis. Psicothema 25(1):79–86
Acknowledgments
Sincere thanks to Vocatio vzw for acknowledging and supporting the curriculum of Yoleen Van Camp. We greatly appreciate the professional and technical support by MWV Healthcare® and the cooperation of all the participating patients. Many thanks for the efforts of the local study nurses, assisting master students and nephrologists Paul Arnouts, Koen Bouman, Ronald Daelemans, Katja De Grande, Elfie Deprez, Wendy Engelen, Heidi Hoeben, Ann Scheipers, Leen Torremans, Daniël Van Caesbroeck, Ludo Van Doorslaer, Sarina Van Loock, Jeannine Van Loon, Bob Van Santbergen and Sandra Vervynckt.
Conflict of interest
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Van Camp, Y.P.M., Vrijens, B., Abraham, I. et al. Adherence to phosphate binders in hemodialysis patients: prevalence and determinants. J Nephrol 27, 673–679 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40620-014-0062-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40620-014-0062-3