Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Familial Factors Influencing Age-Heterogamy vs. Age-Homogamy in Marriage in Bangladesh: Implication for Social Policy Practice

  • Published:
Global Social Welfare Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

This study examines whether family patterns (social origin of family, marital SES, arranged marriage, higher family size norm, and patriarchal family structure (e.g., extended/joint family, patrilocal residence, and family authority) affect age-heterogamy in marriage in rural Bangladesh.

Research Method

One thousand seven hundred fifty-five pairs of married couples for research purpose were randomly selected from Tanore Upazila of Rajshahi district, Bangladesh. The selected couples (e.g., both husband and wife) were individually interviewed, using questionnaire method (e.g., open-ended and close-ended questions). The collected data were analyzed, applying Spearman’s rank order bivariate correlation, X 2 test, and binary logistic regression. Descriptive findings indicated that most of the couples (76.58 %) studied were age-heterogamous than age-homogenous (23.42 %) in the study area.

Findings

Results suggested that age-heterogamous marriages than age-homogamous marriages were significantly associated with ethnicity, marital SES, family income, arranged marriage norms, patrilocal residence, and autocratic family authority, adjusting for sex, age, age at marriage, and marital duration. Of the predicting factors, Muslim ethnicity, lower marital SES, middle family income, arranged marriage, middle family size, patrilocal residence, and autocratic family authority were the greatest (1–3 % times) risks factors to persist age-heterogamous marriages among the married couples in rural Bangladesh.

Implication

This research found that age-heterogamous marriages than age-homogamous marriages were significantly associated with Muslim collective identity than Santal identity, hyper marital SES, arranged marriage, middle family size, and patriarchal family structure (patrilocal residence and men’s absolute authority than other characteristics in the family in rural Bangladesh, adjusting for current age, age at first marriage, and marital duration. The findings may have implications in social policy practice with age-heterogamous married couples in rural Bangladesh.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The value of coefficients is less than 1 indicates negative relation.

References

  • Ahmed, A. U. (1996). Socio-economic determinants of age at first marriage in Bangladesh. Journal of Biosocial Science, 18, 35–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alam, A. Z. M. (1995). Family values. Dhaka, Bangladesh: Bangladesh Cooperative Society Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, M. P., & Glass, B. L. (1985). Marital age heterogamy and homogamy, 1900 to 1980. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 47, 685–691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics (2010). Statistical yearbook of Bangladesh. Dhaka, Bangladesh: Statistics Division, Ministry of Planning, Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics (2012). Statistical yearbook of Bangladesh. Dhaka, Bangladesh: Statistics Division, Ministry of Planning, Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berardo, F. M., Appel, J., & Berardo, D. H. (1993). Age dissimilar marriages: review and assessment. Journal of Aging Studies, 7, 93–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blood, R., & Wolfe, D. (1960). Husbands and wives: the dynamics of married living. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumberg, R. L. (1978). Stratification: socioeconomic and sexual inequality. Dubuque, IA: William C. Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumberg, R. L., & Coleman, T. M. (1989). A theoretical look at the gender balance of power in the American couple. Journal of Family Issue, 10, 225–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouckaert, A., & Boulanger, B. (1997). Marriage: distance between birthplaces and age difference between mates. Human Biology, 69(2), 241–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in mate preferences: evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12(01), 1–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bytheway, W. R. (1981). The variation with age of age differences in marriage. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 43, 923–927.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casterline, J. B., Williams, L., & McDonald, P. (1986). The age difference between spouses: variations among developing countries. Population Studies, 40, 353–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chowdhury, F. D. (2004). The socio-cultural context of child marriage in a Bangladeshi village. International Journal of Social Welfare, 13(4), 244–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, L. P. (2007). Persistent policy effects on the division of domestic tasks in reunified Germany. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69, 930–950.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cramer, D. (1993). Personality, socio-economic status and age disparity in marriage. Personality and Individual Differences, 15(6), 725–727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crissey, S. R. (2005). Race/ethnic differences in the marital expectations of adolescents: the role of romantic relationships. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 67, 697–709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Silva, W. I. (1993). Family formation: socio-cultural differentials in age at first marriage in Sri Lanka. Journal of Family Welfare, 39(3), 55–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, R. (1971). Explaining cross-cultural variations in age at marriage and proportions never marrying. Population Studies, 32(2), 215–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dressel, P. L. (1980). Assortative mating in later life: some initial considerations. Journal of Family Issues, 1, 379–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glick, J. E., Ruf, S. D., White, M. J., & Goldscheider, F. (2006). Educational engagement and early family formation: differences by ethnicity and generation. Social Forces, 84, 1391–1415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goode, W. J. (1963). World revolution and family patterns (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hajnal, J. (1965). European marriage patterns in perspective. In D. V. Glass & D. E. C. Everley (Eds.), Population in history. Essays in historical demography (pp. 101–143). Edward Arnold: London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harpending, H. (1992). Age differences between mates in southern African pastoralists. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 15(1), 102–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heaton, T. B. (1996). Socio-economic and familial status of women associated with age at first marriage in three Islamic societies. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 27(1), 41–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hepworth, D. H., Rooney, R. H., Rooney, G. D., Strom-Gottfried, K., & Larsen, J. A. (2010). Direct social work practice: theory and skills. Belmont: Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Centre for Diarrheal Disease Research, Bangladesh (2007). Health and demographic surveillance system-Matlab:Vol. 39. Dhaka, Bangladesh: International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Islam, M. N., & Ahmed, A. U. (1998). Age at first marriage and its determinants in Bangladesh. Asia Pacific Population Journal, 13(2), 73–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemkes-Grottenthaler, A. (2004). For better or worse, till death do us part: spousal age gap and differential longevity- evidence from historical demography. Collegium Anthropologicum, 28, 203–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klinger-Vartabedian, L., & Wispe, L. (1989). Age differences in marriage and female longevity. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 51(1), 195–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Komter, A. (1989). Hidden power in marriage. Gender and Society, 3, 187–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Labov, T., & Jacobs, J. A. (1986). Intermarriage in Hawaii, 1950-1983. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 48, 78–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H. Y. (1971). A study of changing family values in a Korean middle-town. International Population Conference, London, 1969, 1, 467–468.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, G. R. (1977). Family structure and interaction: a comparative analysis. Philadephia: J. B. Lippincott.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H. Y. (1982). Age at first marriage in peninsular Malaysia. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 44(3), 785–798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, K. M. (2006). Latinas’ transition to first marriage: an examination of four theoretical perspectives. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 68, 993–1014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malhotra, A. (1997). Gender and the timing of marriage: rural-urban differences in java. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 59, 434–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malhotra, A., & Tsui, A. O. (1996). Marriage timing in Sri Lanka: the role of modern norms and ideas. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58, 476–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matras, J. (1965). The social strategy of family formation: some variations in time and space. Demography, 2(1), 349–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mensch, B. (1986). Age differences between spouses in first marriage. Social Biology, 33, 229–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michael, R. T., & Tuma, N. B. (1985). Entry into marriage and parenthood by young men and women: the influence of family background. Demography, 22, 515–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, L. (2006). Counseling skills for social work. London: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitra, S. N., Ali, M. N., Islam, S., Cross, A. R., & Saha, T. (1994). Bangladesh demographic and health survey 1993–1994. Dhaka, Bangladesh: Mitra and Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, B. S. (1981). A contribution to debate on homogamy, propinquity, and segregation. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 43, 909–921.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, S. P., & Rindfuss, R. R. (1982). Household structure and tempo of family formation in comparative perspective. Paper presented at the Annual Meetings of the Population Association of America, San Diego.

  • Morgan, S. P., & Teachman, J. D. (1988). Logistic regression: description, examples, and comparison. Journal of Marriage and Family, 50(4), 929–936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murdock, G. P. (1960). Social structure (p. 10). New York, NY: Macmillan Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nam, C. E., & Terrie, E. W. (1981). Measurement of socioeconomic status: current issues (pp. 29–42). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nye, F. I., & McDonald, G. W. (1979). Family policy research: emergent models and some theoretical issues. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 41(3), 473–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Otto, L. B. (1979). Antecedents and consequences to marital timing. In W. R. Burr et al. (Eds.), Contemporary theories about family: research based theories (Vol. 1, pp. pp. 101–pp. 126). New York, NY: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parrado, E. A., & Zenteno, R. M. (2002). Gender differences in union formation in Mexico: evidence from marital search model. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 64, 756–773.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pillai, V. K. (1985). Predicting age at first marriage: a review of recent models. Journal of Family Welfare, 32(1), 41–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyke, K., & Adams, M. (2010). What’s age got to do with it? A case study analysis of power and gender in husband-older marriages. Journal of Family Issue, 31(6), 748–777.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahaman, S. M. Z. (1995). Muslim marriage practices in a village of Bangladesh. Rajshahi University Studies, 3, (Part-C), 131–149.

  • Raley, R. K., Durden, T. E., & Wildsmith, E. (2004). Understanding Mexican American marriage patterns using a life course approach. Social Science Quarterly, 85(4), 872–890.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reley, R. K., & Sweeney, M. M. (2009). Explaining race and ethnic variation in marriage: directions for future research. Race and Social Problem, 1(3), 132–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Revillard, A. (2006). Work/family policy in France. International Journal of Law, Policy and The Family, 20(2), 133–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy, K. T. (2008). Determinants of early marriage in Rajshahi, Bangladesh. Pakistan Journal of Social Sciences, 5(6), 606–611.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarker, P. C. (1997). Social structure and fertility behaviour. Dhaka: Centre for Development Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarker, P. C. (2005). Social work policy and practice and their implementation through social service programs in Bangladesh. Paper prepared for presentation in the 18th Asia Pacific social work conference held on September 21–24, 2005, Seoul, South Korea.

  • Schoen, R., Wooldredge, J., & Thomas, B. (1989). Ethnic and educational effects on marriage choice. Social Science Quarterly, 70, 617–630.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shafer, K., & James, S. L. (2013). Gender and socioeconomic status differences in first and second marriage formation. Journal of Marriage and Family, 75, 544–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P. C. (1980). Asian marriage patterns in transition. Journal of Family History., 5(1), 58–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • South, S. J. (1991). Sociodemographic differentials in mate selection preferences. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 53(4), 928–940.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • South, S. (2001). The variable effects of family background on the timing of first marriage: United States 1969-1993. Social Science Research, 30(4), 606–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spanier, G., & Glick, P. (1980). Mate selection differentials between whites and blacks in the United States. Social Forces, 58, 707–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, L. (1994). Family values in a historical perspective. Salt Lake City, US: University of Utah Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teachman, J. D., Tedrow, L. M., & Crowder, K. D. (2000). The changing demography of America’s families. Journal of Marriage the Family, 62, 1234–1246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, M. B., & Mitchell-Kernan, C. (1990). New trends in black American interracial marriage: the social structural context. Journal of Marriage and Family, 52, 209–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uddin, M. E. (2009a). Age at first marriage for husband and wife between Muslim and Santal communities in rural Bangladesh. World Academy of Science, Engineering & Technology, 3(7), 673–681.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uddin, M. E. (2009b). Cross-cultural socio-economic status attainment between Muslim and Santal couple in rural Bangladesh. World Academy of Science, Engineering & Technology, 3(7), 789–796.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uddin, M. E. (2009c). Family structure between Muslim and Santal communities in rural Bangladesh. World Academy of Science, Engineering & Technology, 3(7), 703–712.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uddin, M. E. (2009d). Family structure between Muslim and Santal communities in rural Bangladesh. International Journal of Human and Social Sciences, 5(6), 438–447.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uddin, M. E. (2015). Family socio-cultural values affecting early marriage between Muslim and Santal communities in rural Bangladesh. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 35(3/4), 141–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uecker, J. E., & Stokes, C. E. (2008). Early marriage in the United States. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 70(4), 835–846.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (1988). First marriage: patterns and determinants. New York: Population Division.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (1990). Patterns of first marriage: timing and prevalence. New York: Population Division.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (2000). World marriage patterns. New York: Population Division.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) (2001). Early marriage: child spouses. Florence: UNICEF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vera, H., Berardo, D. H., & Berardo, F. M. (1985). Age heterogamy in marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 47(3), 553–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogler, C., & Pahl, I. (1994). Money, power and inequality in marriage. The Sociological Review, 42, 263–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, R. H., & Gunter, B. G. (1987). Change in spouse age difference at marriage: a challenge to traditional family and sex roles? The Sociological Quarterly, 28(3), 411–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, B. (1982). Age differences between spouses and marital instability. Paper presented at the meeting of Population Association of America, San Diego.

  • Wolfe, D. M. (1959). Power and authority in the family. In D. Cartwright (ed.): Studies in social power. The University of Michigan and an Arbor.

Download references

Acknowledgments

Author acknowledged the respondents who were sincerely consent and actively participated in the study: Predictors of Age-Heterogamy in First Time Marriage in Rural Bangladesh.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Social Work, University of Rajshahi, Rajshahi, Bangladesh

    Emaj Uddin & Rabiul Islam

  2. Department of Sociology, University of Rajshahi, Rajshahi, Bangladesh

    Nazmul Hoque

Authors
  1. Emaj Uddin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nazmul Hoque
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Rabiul Islam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emaj Uddin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Uddin, E., Hoque, N. & Islam, R. Familial Factors Influencing Age-Heterogamy vs. Age-Homogamy in Marriage in Bangladesh: Implication for Social Policy Practice. Glob Soc Welf 4, 127–140 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40609-016-0064-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40609-016-0064-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation