Abstract
Background
The last few decades have seen increased theoretical and empirical interest in multidimensional measures of social welfare.
Objectives
The objective of this paper is to introduce social welfare index (SWI) and its trend for Iran.
Materials and Methods
In this mix method study, Delphi technique was conducted to evaluate expert opinion on choice of priority social welfare indicators (study variables) for Iran in 2013. Then, we have used OECD methodology of constructing composite indicators to develop SWI. SWI as well as its trend have been measured for 1967–2010 (sample size = 44 years). Data were obtained from the Central Bank of Iran, Statistical Center of Iran, and Social Security Organization of Iran. Data were analyzed using SPSS software ver. 20 and exploratory factor analysis, Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO), and Bartlett test.
Results
Based on KMO (0.710), data was adequate for underlying analysis and result of Bartlett’s test of sphericity (757.75, df = 45, p < 0.001) imply that correlation matrix of variables was not an identity matrix. Furthermore, the first two factors explained 77.58 % of total variances, together. The results showed that SWI generally has been increasing during the study period. Furthermore, the best and worst performances were devoted to 1971 and 1988, respectively.
Conclusions
Due to having more and diverse dimensions and indicators, SWI can help as a more realistic measure of social welfare.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
49.40 = the highest rate of inflation in the data set
Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin
References
Cobb, C. W. and J. B. Cobb (1994). The Green National Product: a proposed index of sustainable economic welfare.
Dalvandi, A., et al. (2015). Meaning of well-being among Iranian women: a phenomenological descriptive approach. Iran Journal Nurse Midwifery Research, 20(1), 17–24.
Daly, H. E., & Cobb, J. B. (1989). For the common good: redirecting the economy toward community, the environment and a sustainable future. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
Diener, E. (1994). Assessing subjective well-being: progress and opportunities. Social Indicators Research, 31(2), 103–157.
Diener, E., & Tay, L. (2015). Subjective well-being and human welfare around the world as reflected in the Gallup World Poll. International Journal of Psychology, 50(2), 135–149.
Falkingham, J., et al. (1997). Household welfare in Central Asia. Macmillan Press.
Fitzpatrick, T. (2002). The two paradoxes of welfare democracy. International Journal of Social Welfare, 11(2), 159–169.
Fleurbaey, M. (2009). Beyond GDP: the quest for a measure of social welfare. Journal of Economic Literature, 1029–1075.
Iran, S. C. O. (2012). Iran statistical yearbook. Tehran: Statistical Centre of Iran.
Islam, S. N., & Clarke, M. (2002). The Relationship between economic development and social welfare: a new adjusted GDP measure of welfare. Social Indicators Research, 57(2), 201–229.
Kubiszewski, I., et al. (2013). Beyond GDP: measuring and achieving global genuine progress. Ecological Economics, 93, 57–68.
Machado, J. A., & Mata, M. E. (2015). Analysis of world economic variables using multidimensional scaling. PloS One, 10(3), e0121277.
McGillivray, M. (1991). The human development index: yet another redundant composite development indicator? World Development, 19(10), 1461–1468.
Mohaqeqi Kamal, S. H., Rafiey, H., Sajjadi, H., Rahgozar, M., & Abbasian, E. (2015). Territorial analysis of social welfare in Iran. Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy, 31(3), 271–282.
Nardo, M., Saisana, M., Saltelli, A., Tarantola, S., Hoffman, A., & Giovannini, E. (2008). Handbook on constructing composite indicators: methodology and user guide. OECD Statistics Working Paper, STD/DOC(2008)3. Resource document. Retrieved from http://www.olis.oecd.org/olis/2005doc.nsf/. Accessed July 2009.
Ng, Y.-K. (2003). From preference to happiness: towards a more complete welfare economics. Social Choice and Welfare, 20(2), 307–350.
Noll, H.-H. (2004). Social indicators and quality of life research: background, achievements and current trends. Advances in sociological knowledge. N. Genov, VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften: 151–181.
Osberg, L., & Sharpe, A. (1999). An index of economic well-being for Canada and United States. Paper presented to the annual meeting of the American Economic Association, New York. Retrieved from http://www.csls.ca.
Pacek, A., & Radcliff, B. (2008). Assessing the welfare state: the politics of happiness. Perspectives on Politics, 6(02), 267–277.
Reig-Martínez, E. (2013). Social and economic wellbeing in Europe and the Mediterranean Basin: building an enlarged human development indicator. Social Indicators Research, 111(2), 527–547.
Sen, A. (1996). Employment, institutions and technology: some policy issues. International Labour Review, 135, 3–4.
Stiglitz, J., Sen, A., & Fitoussi, J. P. (2009). The measurement of economic performance and social progress revisited. Reflections and overview. Paris: Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress.
Taylor, G. (2007). Ideology and welfare. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Thiry, G. (2014). Beyond GDP: conceptual grounds of quantification. The case of the Index of Economic Well-Being (IEWB). Social Indicators Research, 1–31.
UNDP (1990–2012). Human development report. New York: Oxford University press.
Zarzosa Espina, P., & Somarriba Arechavala, N. (2013). An assessment of social welfare in Spain: territorial analysis using a synthetic welfare indicator. Social Indicators Research, 111(1), 1–23.
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by a research grant from deputy of research and technology, University of Social Welfare, and Rehabilitation, Tehran, Iran.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mohaqeqi Kamal, S.H., Rafiey, H., Sajjadi, H. et al. Longitudinal Analysis of Social Welfare Situation in Iran (1967–2010). Glob Soc Welf 3, 279–286 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40609-016-0050-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40609-016-0050-8