Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Assessing the Learning Environment for Medical Students: An Evaluation of a Novel Survey Instrument in Four Medical Schools

  • In Brief Report
  • Published:
Academic Psychiatry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

A practical, reliable, and valid instrument is needed to measure the impact of the learning environment on medical students’ well-being and educational experience and to meet medical school accreditation requirements.

Methods

From 2012 to 2015, medical students were surveyed at the end of their first, second, and third year of studies at four medical schools. The survey assessed students’ perceptions of the following nine dimensions of the school culture: vitality, self-efficacy, institutional support, relationships/inclusion, values alignment, ethical/moral distress, work-life integration, gender equity, and ethnic minority equity. The internal reliability of each of the nine dimensions was measured. Construct validity was evaluated by assessing relationships predicted by our conceptual model and prior research. Assessment was made of whether the measurements were sensitive to differences over time and across institutions.

Results

Six hundred and eighty-six students completed the survey (49 % women; 9 % underrepresented minorities), with a response rate of 89 % (range over the student cohorts 72–100 %). Internal consistency of each dimension was high (Cronbach’s α 0.71–0.86). The instrument was able to detect significant differences in the learning environment across institutions and over time. Construct validity was supported by demonstrating several relationships predicted by our conceptual model.

Conclusions

The C-Change Medical Student Survey is a practical, reliable, and valid instrument for assessing the learning environment of medical students. Because it is sensitive to changes over time and differences across institution, results could potentially be used to facilitate and monitor improvements in the learning environment of medical students.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Dyrbye LN, Shanafelt TD. A narrative review on burnout experienced by medical students and residents. Med Educ. 2016;50:132–49.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Pololi LH, Krupat E, Civian JT, Ash AS, Brennan RT. Why are a quarter of faculty considering leaving academic medicine? A study of their perceptions of institutional culture and intentions to leave at 26 representative U.S. medical schools. Acad Med. 2012;87:859–69.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. West DC, Robins L, Gruppen LD. Workforce, learners, competencies, and the learning environment. Research in medical education 2014 and the way forward. Acad Med. 2014;89:1432–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Marshall E. Measuring the medical school learning environment. J Med Educ. 1978;53:98–104.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Pololi L, Price J. Validation and use of an instrument to measure the learning environment as perceived by medical students. Teach Learn Med. 2000;12:201–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Roff S, McAleer S, Harden RM, Al-Qahtani M, Ahmed A, Deza H, et al. Development and validation of the Dundee Ready Education Environment Measure (DREEM). Med Teach. 1997;19:295–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Rdesinski RE, Chappelle KG, Elliot DL, Litzelman DK, Palmer R, Biagioli FE. Development and use of an instrument adapted to assess the clinical skills learning environment in the pre-clinical years. Med Sci Educ. 2015;25:285–91.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Shochet RB, Colbert-Getz JM, Wright SM. The Johns Hopkins learning environment scale: measuring medical students’ perceptions of the processes supporting professional formation. Acad Med. 2015;90:810–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Colbert-Getz JM, Kim S, Goode VH, Shochet RB, Wright SM. Assessing medical students’ and residents’ perceptions of the learning environment: exploring validity evidence for the interpretation of scores from existing tools. Acad Med. 2014;89:1687–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. DeVellis RF. Scale development: theory and applications. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc.; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Pololi LH, Civian JT, Brennan RT, Dotollo AL, Krupat E. Experiencing the culture of academic medicine: gender matters, a national study. J Gen Intern Med. 2013;28:201–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Pololi LH, Evans AT, Civian JT, Gibbs BK, Coplit LD, Gillum LH, et al. Faculty vitality—surviving the challenges facing academic health centers: a national survey of medical faculty. Acad Med. 2015;90:930–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Alexander Feldman for his assistance in manuscript preparation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Linda H. Pololi.

Ethics declarations

IRB approval was obtained from Brandeis University and all participating institutions.

Disclosure

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Funding Sources

This study was funded by the National Initiative on Gender, Culture and Leadership in Medicine, C-Change. Participating medical schools funded the survey administration in their respective schools.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pololi, L.H., Evans, A.T., Nickell, L. et al. Assessing the Learning Environment for Medical Students: An Evaluation of a Novel Survey Instrument in Four Medical Schools. Acad Psychiatry 41, 354–359 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-016-0620-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-016-0620-1

Keywords

Navigation