Skip to main content
Log in

Clinical Case Vignettes: A Promising Tool to Assess Competence in the Management of Agitation

  • In Brief Report
  • Published:
Academic Psychiatry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

While standardized patients (SPs) remain the gold standard for assessing clinical competence in a standardized setting, clinical case vignettes that allow free-text, open-ended written responses are more resource- and time-efficient assessment tools. It remains unknown, however, whether this is a valid method for assessing competence in the management of agitation.

Methods

Twenty-six psychiatry residents partook in a randomized controlled study evaluating a simulation-based teaching intervention on the management of agitated patients. Competence in the management of agitation was assessed using three separate modalities: simulation with SPs, open-ended clinical vignettes, and self-report questionnaires.

Results

Performance on clinical vignettes correlated significantly with SP-based assessments (r = 0.59, p = 0.002); self-report questionnaires that assessed one’s own ability to manage agitation did not correlate with SP-based assessments (r = −0.06, p = 0.77).

Conclusions

Standardized clinical vignettes may be a simple, time-efficient, and valid tool for assessing residents’ competence in the management of agitation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Webb LC, Juul D, Reynolds CF, Ruiz B, Ruiz P, Scheiber SC, et al. How well does the psychiatry residency in-training examination predict performance on the American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology. Part I. Examination? Am J Psychiatry. 1996;153:831–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Colliver JA, Swartz MH. Assessing clinical performance with standardized patients. JAMA. 1997;278:790–1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Peabody JW, Luck J, Glassman P, Jain S, Hansen J, Spell M, et al. Measuring the quality of physician practice by using clinical vignettes: a prospective validation study. Ann Intern Med. 2004;141:771–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Peabody JW, Luck J, Glassman P, Dresselhaus TR, Lee M. Comparison of vignettes, standardized patients, and chart abstraction: a prospective validation study of 3 methods for measuring quality. JAMA. 2000;283:1715–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Morgan PJ, Cleave-Hogg DM, Guest CB, Herold J. Validity and reliability of undergraduate performance assessments in an anesthesia simulator. Can J Anaesth. 2001;48:225–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Vestal HS, Sowden G, Nejad S, Stoklosa J, Valcourt SC, Keary C, et al. Simulation-based training for residents in the management of acute agitation: a cluster randomized controlled trial. Acad Psychiatry. 2016. doi:10.1007/s40596-016-0559-2.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Nordstrom K, Zun LS, Wilson MP, Md VS, Ng AT, Bregman B, et al. Medical evaluation and triage of the agitated patient: consensus statement of the American association for emergency psychiatry project beta medical evaluation workgroup. West J Emerg Med. 2012;13:3–10.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Wilson MP, Pepper D, Currier GW, Holloman GH, Feifel D. The psychopharmacology of agitation: consensus statement of the American association for emergency psychiatry project beta psychopharmacology workgroup. West J Emerg Med. 2012;13:26–34.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Hasser C, Hung E, Steward C, Weiss A, Williams N, Young J. Proposed EPAs for psychiatry residency programs: what are they and how can they be useful? 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kruger J, Dunning D. Unskilled and unaware of it: how difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1999;77:1121–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Jeanne McHale, RN and Gail Alexander, RN of the Knight Simulation Program within The Institute for Patient Care at Massachusetts General Hospital, as well as Qure Healthcare, for their help and contributions to this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gillian L. Sowden.

Ethics declarations

The study was approved by the Partners Healthcare Institutional Review Board, and all participants gave informed consent to be part of the study.

Disclosure of Funding

Grant support was provided by the Partners Centers of Expertise in Medical Education.

Conflicts of Interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sowden, G.L., Vestal, H.S., Stoklosa, J.B. et al. Clinical Case Vignettes: A Promising Tool to Assess Competence in the Management of Agitation. Acad Psychiatry 41, 364–368 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-016-0604-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-016-0604-1

Keywords

Navigation