Abstract
Objective
The aim of this study was to determine if communication skills differ for medical students entering person or technique-oriented specialties.
Methods
Communication ratings by clerkship preceptors on an institutionally required end of clerkship medical student performance evaluation (SPE) form were compiled for 2011/2012 academic year (Class of 2013). M3 clerkships and the Class of 2013 match appointments were categorized as person or technique-oriented clerkships/specialties. Mean differences in SPE communication scores were determined by analyses of variance (ANOVA) and independent t tests. Score associations were determined by Pearson correlations. Inter-item reliability was reported with Cronbach alpha.
Results
The Class of 2013 match appointments were as follows: person-oriented (N = 91) and technique-oriented (N = 91) residency specialties. There was no significant difference in mean communication scores for medical students who entered person-oriented (mean 7.8, SD 0.4) versus technique-oriented (mean 7.9, SD 0.4) specialties (p = 0.258) or for person-oriented clerkship (mean 7.8, SD 0.4) versus technique-oriented clerkship (mean 7.9, SD 0.6) ratings for medical students who matched into person-oriented specialties (p = 0.124). Medical students who matched into technique-oriented specialties (mean 8.1, SD 0.5) received significantly higher (p = 0.001) communication ratings as compared with those matching into person-oriented specialties (mean 7.8, SD 0.5) from technique-oriented clerkships.
Conclusions
Communication with patients and families is a complex constellation of specific abilities that appear to be influenced by the rater’s specialty. Further study is needed to determine if technique-oriented specialties communication skill rating criteria differ from those used by raters from person-oriented specialties.
References
Henry SG, Holmboe ES, Frankel RM. Evidence-based competencies for improving communication skills in graduate medical education: a review with suggestions for implementation. Med Teach. 2013;35:395–403.
King A, Hoppe RA. “Best Practice” for patient-centered communication: a narrative review. J Grad Med Educ. 2013;5(3):385–93.
Liaison Committee on Medical Education. Functions and Structure of a Medical School: Standards for Accreditation of Medical Education Programs Leading to the M.D. Degree. June 2013. Accessed December 2, 2013. https://www.lcme.org/publications/functions2013june.pdf
United States Medical Licensing Examination. Changes to USMLE 2014–15. November 2013. Accessed December 2, 2013. http://www.usmle.org/pdfs/Changes_to_USMLE_2014-2015_handout_FINAL.pdf.
Balmer JT. The transformation of continuing medical education (CME) in the United States. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2013;4:171–82.
Interprofessional Education Collaborative Expert Panel. (2011). Core competencies for interprofessional collaborative practice: Report of an expert panel. Washington, D.C.: Interprofessional Education Collaborative. Accessed December 2, 2013 http://www.aacn.nche.edu/education-resources/ipecreport.pdf.
Sullivan G, Simpson D, Cooney T, Beresin E. A milestone in the millstones movement: the JGME milestones supplement. J Grad Med Educ. 2013;5(1s):1–4.
Manuel RS, Borges NJ, Jones BJ. Person-oriented versus technique-oriented specialties: early preferences and eventual choice. Med Educ Online. 2009;14:4. doi:10.3885/meo.2009.Res00284.
Hobgood CD, Riviello RJ, Jouriles N, Hamilton G. Assessment of communication and interpersonal skills competencies. Acad Emerg Med. 2002;9(11):1257–69.
Rider EA, Keefer CH. Communication skills competencies: definitions and a teaching toolbox. Med Educ. 2006;40(7):624–9.
Backes KA, Borges NJ, Binder SB, Roman B. First-year medical student objective structured clinical exam performance and specialty choice. Int J Med Educ. 2013;4:38–40.
Ciechanowski PS, Russo JE, Katon WJ, Walker EA. Attachment theory in health care: the influence of relationship style on medical students’ specialty choice. Med Educ. 2004;38(3):262–70.
Batenburg V, Smal JA, Lodder A, de Melker RA. Are professional attitudes related to gender and medical specialty? Med Educ. 1999;33(7):489–92.
Wang-Cheng RM, Fulkerson PK, Barnas GP, Lawrence SL. Effect of student and preceptor gender on clinical grades in an ambulatory care clerkship. Acad Med. 1995;70(4):324–6.
Disclosure
The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ping Tsao, C.I., Simpson, D. & Treat, R. Medical Student Communication Skills and Specialty Choice. Acad Psychiatry 39, 275–279 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-014-0165-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-014-0165-0