Abstract
The purpose was to compare the bone samples histomorphometrically regarding trabecular bone properties in the patients with osteoarthritis (OA) and osteoporosis (OP). Femoral head specimens were obtained from 18 patients with OA and 17 patients with femoral neck fracture due to OP during hip arthroplasty. Histomorphometric analyses were performed by soft ware program (Carl Zeiss) to measure trabecular area (Tb.a, mm3), trabecular thickness (Tb.th, µm) and trabecular separation (Tb.s, µm). In the results, Tb.a and Tb.th values were significantly lower (p < 0.05), Tb.s was higher in the patients with OP (p < 0.05). Bone metabolism parameters were different between the groups (p < 0.05). All histomorphometric parameters were highly correlated with the BMDs (p < 0.01). This study showed inverse relation between OA and OP regarding trabecular bone properties, BMD and bone turnover metabolism markers. The strong relations between results suggest that either BMDs or bone turnover markers can be used for prescience of the fractures.
References
Dequeker J, Boonen S, Aerssens J et al (1996) Inverse relationship osteoarthritis-osteoporosis: what is the evidence? What are the consequences? Br J Rheumatol 35:813–818
Klose-Jensen R, Hartlev LB, Boel LW, et al. (2015) Subchondral bone turnover, but not bone volume, is increased in early stage osteoarthritic lesions in the human hip joint. Osteoarthr Cartil. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2015.06.001
Hart DJ, Cronin C, Daniels M et al (2002) The relationship of bone density and fracture to incident and progressive radiographic osteoarthritis of the knee. Arthritis Rheum 46:92–99
Dequeker J, Johnell O, MEDOS Study Group (1993) Osteoarthritis protects against femoral neck fracture. Bone 14:S51–S56
Chan MY, Center JR, Eisman JA et al (2014) Bone mineral density and association of osteoarthritis with fracture risk. Osteoarthr Cartil 22:1251–1258
Makinen TJ, Alm JJ, Laine H et al (2007) The incidence of osteopenia and osteoporosis in women with hip osteoarthritis scheduled for cementless total joint replacement. Bone 40:1041–1047
Seeman E, Delmas PD (2006) Bone quality:the material and structural basis of bone strength and fragility. N Engl J Med 354:2250–2261
Chavassieux P, Seeman E, Delmas PD (2007) Insights into material and structural basis of bone fragility from diseases associated with fractures: how determinants of the biomechanical properties of bone are compromised by disease. Endocr Rev 28:151–164
Jordan GR, Loveridge N, Bell KL et al (2003) Increased femoral neck cancellous bone and connectivity in coxarthrosis (hip osteoarthritis). Bone 32:86–95
Johnell O, Kanis JA, Oden A et al (2005) Predictive value of BMD for hip and other fractures. J Bone Miner Res 20:1185–1194
Vasikaran S, Eastell R, Bruyère O et al (2011) Markers of bone turnover for the prediction of fracture risk and monitoring of osteoporosis treatment: a need for international reference standards. Osteoporos Int 22:391–420
Nielsen HK, Laurberg P, Brixen K et al (1991) Relations between diurnal variations in serum osteocalcin, cortisol, parathyroid hormone, and ionized calcium in normal individuals. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh) 124:391–398
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
None.
Statement of human and animal rights
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cınar, Y., Atamaz, F.C., Kirazli, Y. et al. A comparison of the femur heads histomorphometrically regarding trabecular bone properties in the patients with osteoporosis and osteoarthritis. Aging Clin Exp Res 28, 997–1001 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-015-0491-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-015-0491-4