Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

SICUS and CEUS imaging in Crohn’s disease: an update

  • Review
  • Published:
Journal of Ultrasound Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Endoscopy remains the main technique in the diagnosis and treatment of Crohn’s disease (CD); nevertheless, the recent development of innovative and non-invasive imaging techniques has led to a new tool in the exploration of small bowel in CD patients. This paper reviews the available data on ultrasound imaging used for the evaluation of CD, highlighting the role of small intestine contrast-enhanced ultrasonography with the use of oral and intravenous contrast agents.

Sommario

Nell’iter diagnostico e terapeutico della malattia di Crohn l’endoscopia rappresenta la principale metodica strumentale. Tuttavia, la recente introduzione di tecniche di imaging innovative e non invasive ha implementato lo studio dell’intestino nelle malattie infiammatorie croniche intestinali. La seguente revisione raccoglie i dati disponibili in letteratura relativi all’utilizzo dell’ecografia con mezzo di contrasto, sia orale (SICUS) sia endovenoso (CEUS), nella valutazione dei pazienti affetti da malattia di Crohn.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cosnes J, Cattan S, Blain A et al (2002) Long-term evolution of disease behavior of Crohn’s disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 8:244–250

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Van Assche G, Dignass A, Reinisch W et al (2010) European Crohn’s and Colitis Organisation (ECCO). The second European evidence-based consensus on the diagnosis and management of Crohn’s disease: special situations. J Crohns Colitis 4:63–101

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Van Assche G, Dignass A, Panes J et al (2010) European Crohn’s and Colitis Organisation (ECCO). The second European evidence-based consensus on the diagnosis and management of Crohn’s disease: definitions and diagnosis. J Crohns Colitis 4:7–27

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fletcher JG, Fidler JL, Bruining DH et al (2011) New concepts in intestinal imaging for inflammatory bowel diseases. Gastroenterology 140:1795–1806

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Pariente B, Cosnes J, Danese S et al (2011) Development of the Crohn’s disease digestive damage score, the Lémann score. Inflamm Bowel Dis 17:1415–1422

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Panés J, Bouzas R, Chaparro M et al (2011) Systematic review: the use of ultrasonography, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis, assessment of activity and abdominal complications of Crohn’s disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 34:125–145

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Horsthuis K, Bipat S, Bennink RJ et al (2008) Inflammatory bowel disease diagnosed with US, MR, scintigraphy, and CT: meta-analysis of prospective studies. Radiology 247:64–79

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lichtenstein GR, Hanauer SB, Sandborn WJ (2009) Practice parameters committee of american college of gastroenterology. management of crohn’s disease in adults. Am J Gastroenterol 104:465–483

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Panes J, Bouhnik Y, Reinisch W et al (2013) Imaging techniques for assessment of inflammatory bowel disease: joint ECCO and ESGAR evidence-based consensus guidelines. J Crohns Colitis 7:556–585

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Jaffe TA, Gaca AM, Delaney S et al (2007) Radiation doses from small-bowel follow-through and abdominopelvic MDCT in Crohn’s disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189:1015–1022

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Desmond AN, O’Regan K, Curran C et al (2008) Crohn’s disease: factors associated with exposure to high levels of diagnostic radiation. Gut 57:1524–1529

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Valette PJ, Rioux M, Pilleul F et al (2001) Ultrasonography of chronic inflammatory bowel diseases. Eur Radiol 11:1859–1866

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Calabrese E, Zorzi F, Pallone F (2012) Ultrasound of the small bowel in Crohn’s disease. Int J Inflam 2012:964720. doi:10.1155/2012/964720

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Strobel D, Goertz RS, Bernatik T (2011) Diagnostics in inflammatory bowel disease: ultrasound. World J Gastroenterol 17:3192–3197

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Maconi G, Bollani S, Bianchi Porro G (1996) Ultrasonographic detection of intestinal complications in Crohn’s disease. Dig Dis Sci 41:1643–1648

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gasche C, Moser G, Turetschek K et al (1999) Transabdominal bowel sonography for the detection of intestinal complications in Crohn’s disease. Gut 44:112–117

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Maconi G, Carsana L, Fociani P et al (2003) Small bowel stenosis in Crohn’s disease: clinical, biochemical and ultrasonographic evaluation of histological features. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 18:749–756

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Andreoli A, Cerro P, Falasco G et al (1998) Role of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of postsurgical recurrence of Crohn’s disease. Am J Gastroenterol 93:1117–1121

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Calabrese E, Petruzziello C, Onali S et al (2009) Severity of postoperative recurrence in Crohn’s disease: correlation between endoscopic and sonographic findings. Inflamm Bowel Dis 15:1635–1642

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Nylund K, Hausken T, Gilja OH (2010) Ultrasound and inflammatory bowel disease. Ultrasound Q 26:3–15

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Migaleddu V, Scanu AM, Quaia E et al (2009) Contrast-enhanced ultrasonographic evaluation of inflammatory activity in Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology 137:43–52

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ripollés T, Martínez MJ, Paredes JM et al (2009) Crohn disease: correlation of findings at contrast-enhanced US with severity at endoscopy. Radiology 253:241–248

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Calabrese E, La Seta F, Buccellato A et al (2005) Crohn’s disease: a comparative prospective study of transabdominal ultrasonography, small intestine contrast ultrasonography, and small bowel enema. Inflamm Bowel Dis 11:139–145

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Pallotta N, Vincoli G, Montesani C et al (2012) Small intestine contrast ultrasonography (SICUS) for the detection of small bowel complications in Crohn’s disease: a prospective comparative study versus intraoperative findings. Inflamm Bowel Dis 18:74–84

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Pallotta N, Tomei E, Viscido A et al (2005) Small intestine contrast ultrasonography: an alternative to radiology in the assessment of small bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 11:146–153

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Calabrese E, Petruzziello C, Onali S et al (2009) Severity of postoperative recurrence in Crohn’s disease: correlation between endoscopic and sonographic findings. Inflamm Bowel Dis 15:1635–1642

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Parente F, Greco S, Molteni M et al (2004) Oral contrast enhanced bowel ultrasonography in the assessment of small intestine Crohn’s disease. A prospective comparison with conventional ultrasound, X ray studies, and ileocolonoscopy. Gut 53:1652–1657

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Calabrese E, Zorzi F, Pallone F (2012) Ultrasound in Crohn’s disease. Curr Drug Targets 13:1224–1233

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Pallotta N, Baccini F, Corazziari E (2001) Small intestine contrast ultrasonography (SICUS) in the diagnosis of small intestine lesions. Ultrasound Med Biol 27:335–341

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Pallotta N, Civitelli F, Di Nardo G et al (2013) Small intestine contrast ultrasonography in pediatric Crohn’s disease. J Pediatr 163:778–784

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Farmer RG, Whelan G, Fazio VW (1985) Long-term follow-up of patients with Crohn’s disease. Relationship between the clinical pattern and prognosis. Gastroenterology 88:1818–1825

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Calabrese E, Zorzi F, Zuzzi S et al (2012) Development of a numerical index quantitating small bowel damage as detected by ultrasonography in Crohn’s disease. J Crohns Colitis 6:852–860

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Chatu S, Pilcher J, Saxena SK et al (2012) Diagnostic accuracy of small intestine ultrasonography using an oral contrast agent in Crohn’s disease: comparative study from the UK. Clin Radiol 67:553–559

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Calabrese E, Zorzi F, Onali S et al (2013) Accuracy of small-intestine contrast ultrasonography, compared with computed tomography enteroclysis, in characterizing lesions in patients with Crohn’s disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 11:950–955

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Aloi M, Di Nardo G, Romano G et al (2015) Magnetic resonance enterography, small-intestine contrast US, and capsule endoscopy to evaluate the small bowel in pediatric Crohn’s disease: a prospective, blinded, comparison study. Gastrointest Endosc 81:420–427

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Kumar S, Hakim A, Alexakis C et al (2015) Small intestinal contrast ultrasonography for the detection of small bowel complications in Crohn’s disease: correlation with intraoperative findings and magnetic resonance enterography. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 30:86–91

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Futagami Y, Haruma K, Hata J et al (1999) Development and validation of an ultrasonographic activity index of Crohn’s disease. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 11:1007–1012

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Maconi G, Radice E, Greco S et al (2006) Bowel ultrasound in Crohn’s disease. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 20:93–112

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Onali S, Calabrese E, Petruzziello C et al (2012) Small intestine contrast ultrasonography vs computed tomography enteroclysis for assessing ileal Crohn’s disease. World J Gastroenterol 18:6088–6095

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Pallotta N, Giovannone M, Pezzotti P et al (2010) Ultrasonographic detection and assessment of the severity of Crohn’s disease recurrence after ileal resection. BMC Gastroenterol 10:69

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Rutgeerts P, Geboes K, Vantrappen G et al (1984) Natural history of recurrent Crohn’s disease at the ileocolonic anastomosis after curative surgery. Gut 25:665–672

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Castiglione F, Bucci L, Pesce G et al (2008) Oral contrast-enhanced sonography for the diagnosis and grading of postsurgical recurrence of Crohn’s disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 14:1240–1245

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Ribaldone DG, Cammarota T, Resegotti A et al (2014) Power doppler sonography to predict the risk of surgical recurrence of Crohn’s disease. J Ultrasound 18:51–55

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Onali S, Calabrese E, Petruzziello C et al (2010) Endoscopic vs ultrasonographic findings related to Crohn’s disease recurrence: a prospective longitudinal study at 3 years. J Crohns Colitis 4:319–328

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Rispo A, Bucci L, Pesce G et al (2006) Bowel sonography for the diagnosis and grading of postsurgical recurrence of Crohn’s disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 12:486–490

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Frøslie KF, Jahnsen J, Moum BA et al (2007) IBSEN Group. Mucosal healing in inflammatory bowel disease: results from a Norwegian population-based cohort. Gastroenterology 133:412–422

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Solberg IC, Lygren I, Jahnsen J (2008) Mucosal healing after initial treatment may be a prognostic marker for long-term outcome in inflammatory bowel disease. Gut 57:A15

    Google Scholar 

  48. Baert F, Moortgat L, Van Assche G et al (2010) Belgian inflammatory bowel disease research group; North-Holland Gut Club. Mucosal healing predicts sustained clinical remission in patients with early-stage Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology 138:463–468

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Schnitzler F, Fidder H, Ferrante M et al (2009) Mucosal healing predicts long-term outcome of maintenance therapy with infliximab in Crohn’s disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 15:1295–1301

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Bruining DH, Loftus EV Jr, Ehman EC et al (2011) Computed tomography enterography detects intestinal wall changes and effects of treatment in patients with Crohn’s disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 9:679–683

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Van Assche G, Herrmann KA, Louis E et al (2013) Effects of infliximab therapy on transmural lesions as assessed by magnetic resonance enteroclysis in patients with ileal Crohn’s disease. J Crohns Colitis 7:950–957

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Castiglione F, Testa A, Rea M et al (2013) Transmural healing evaluated by bowel sonography in patients with Crohn’s disease on maintenance treatment with biologics. Inflamm Bowel Dis 19:1928–1934

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Ordás I, Rimola J, Rodríguez S et al (2014) Accuracy of magnetic resonance enterography in assessing response to therapy and mucosal healing in patients with Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology 146:374–382

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Zorzi F, Stasi E, Bevivino G et al (2014) A sonographic lesion index for Crohn’s disease helps monitor changes in transmural bowel damage during therapy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 12:2071–2077

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Quaia E (2007) Contrast-specific ultrasound techniques. Radiol Med 112:473–490

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Wilson SR, Burns PN (2010) Microbubble-enhanced US in body imaging: what role? Radiology 257:24–39

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Piscaglia F, Bolondi L (2006) Italian society for ultrasound in medicine and biology (SIUMB) study group on ultrasound contrast agents. The safety of Sonovue in abdominal applications: retrospective analysis of 23188 investigations. Ultrasound Med Biol 32:1369–1375

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Geleijnse ML, Nemes A, Vletter WB et al (2009) Adverse reactions after the use of sulphur hexafluoride (SonoVue) echo contrast agent. J Cardiovasc Med 10:75–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Ma X, Li Y, Jia H et al (2015) Contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the diagnosis of patients suspected of having active Crohn’s disease: meta-analysis. Ultrasound Med Biol 41:659–668

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Robotti D, Cammarota T, Debani P et al (2004) Activity of Crohn disease: value of color-power-doppler and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography. Abdom Imaging 29:648–652

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Serra C, Menozzi G, Labate AM et al (2007) Ultrasound assessment of vascularization of the thickened terminal ileum wall in Crohn’s disease patients using a low-mechanical index real-time scanning technique with a second generation ultrasound contrast agent. Eur J Radiol 62:114–121

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Parente F, Maconi G, Bollani S et al (2002) Bowel ultrasound in assessment of Crohn’s disease and detection of related small bowel strictures: a prospective comparative study versus x ray and intraoperative findings. Gut 50:490–495

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Girlich C, Jung EM, Iesalnieks I et al (2009) Quantitative assessment of bowel wall vascularisation in Crohn’s disease with contrast-enhanced ultrasound and perfusion analysis. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc 43:141–148

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Girlich C, Jung EM, Huber E et al (2011) Comparison between preoperative quantitative assessment of bowel wall vascularization by contrast-enhanced ultrasound and operative macroscopic findings and results of histopathological scoring in Crohn’s disease. Ultraschall Med 32:154–159

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Girlich C, Schacherer D, Jung EM et al (2012) Comparison between a clinical activity index (harvey-bradshaw-index), laboratory inflammation markers and quantitative assessment of bowel wall vascularization by contrast-enhanced ultrasound in Crohn’s disease. Eur J Radiol 81:1105–1109

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Ripollés T, Rausell N, Paredes JM et al (2013) Effectiveness of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for characterisation of intestinal inflammation in Crohn’s disease: a comparison with surgical histopathology analysis. J Crohns Colitis 7:120–128

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Nylund K, Jirik R, Mezl M et al (2013) Quantitative contrast-enhanced ultrasound comparison between inflammatory and fibrotic lesions in patients with Crohn’s disease. Ultrasound Med Biol 39:1197–1206

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Quaia E, De Paoli L, Stocca T et al (2012) The value of small bowel wall contrast enhancement after sulfur hexafluoride-filled microbubble injection to differentiate inflammatory from fibrotic strictures in patients with Crohn’s disease. Ultrasound Med Biol 38:1324–1332

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Ripollés T, Martínez MJ, Paredes JM et al (2009) Crohn disease: correlation of findings at contrast-enhanced US with severity at endoscopy. Radiology 253:241–248

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Moreno N, Ripollés T, Paredes JM et al (2014) Usefulness of abdominal ultrasonography in the analysis of endoscopic activity in patients with Crohn’s disease: changes following treatment with immunomodulators and/or anti-TNF antibodies. J Crohns Colitis 8:1079–1087

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Quaia E, Migaleddu V, Baratella E et al (2009) The diagnostic value of small bowel wall vascularity after sulfur hexafluoride-filled microbubble injection in patients with Crohn’s disease. Correlation with the therapeutic effectiveness of specific anti-inflammatory treatment. Eur J Radiol 69:438–444

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Quaia E, Cabibbo B, De Paoli L et al (2013) The value of time-intensity curves obtained after microbubble contrast agent injection to discriminate responders from non-responders to anti-inflammatory medication among patients with Crohn’s disease. Eur Radiol 23:1650–1659

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Paredes JM, Ripollés T, Cortés X et al (2013) Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography: usefulness in the assessment of postoperative recurrence of Crohn’s disease. J Crohns Colitis 7:192–201

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. De Franco A, Di Veronica A, Armuzzi A et al (2012) Ileal Crohn disease: mural microvascularity quantified with contrast-enhanced US correlates with disease activity. Radiology 262:680–688

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Guidi L, De Franco A, De Vitis I (2006) Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography with SonoVue after infliximab therapy in Crohn’s disease. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 10:23–26

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Quaia E, Sozzi M, Angileri R et al (2016) Time-intensity curves obtained after microbubble injection can be used to differentiate responders from nonresponders among patients with clnically active Crohn’s disease after 6 weeks of pharmacologic treatment. Radiology 18:152461

    Google Scholar 

  77. Medellin-Kowalewski A, Wilkens R, Wilson A et al (2016) Quantitative contrast-enhanced ultrasound parameters in Crohn’s disease: their role in disease activity determination with ultrasound. Am J Roentgenol 206:64–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Baumgart DC, Müller HP, Grittner U et al (2015) US-based real-time elastography for the detection of fibrotic gut tissue in patients with stricturing Crohn disease. Radiology 275:889–899

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Fraquelli M, Branchi F, Cribiù FM et al (2015) The role of ultrasound elasticity imaging in predicting ileal fibrosis in Crohn’s disease patients. Inflamm Bowel Dis 21:2605–2612

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Giannetti A, Randisi P, Stumpo M et al (2014) Diagnosis of one small bowel tumor: the role of conventional ultrasound and elastography. J Ultrasound 19:57–60

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  81. Giannetti A, Biscontri M, Matergi M et al (2016) Feasibility of CEUS and strain elastography in one case of ileum Crohn stricture and literature review. J Ultrasound 19:231–237

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Gastroenterology Unit, Brotzu Hospital, Cagliari, Italy

    Giammarco Mocci & Francesco Cabras

  2. Sardinian Mediterranean Imaging Research Group, SMIRG No-profit Foundation, Via Gorizia 11, 07100, Sassari, Italy

    Vincenzo Migaleddu, Danilo Sirigu, Domenico Scanu, Giuseppe Virgilio & Manuela Marzo

Authors
  1. Giammarco Mocci
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Vincenzo Migaleddu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Francesco Cabras
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Danilo Sirigu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Domenico Scanu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Giuseppe Virgilio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Manuela Marzo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manuela Marzo.

Ethics declarations

This review was not funded by any grants.

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mocci, G., Migaleddu, V., Cabras, F. et al. SICUS and CEUS imaging in Crohn’s disease: an update. J Ultrasound 20, 1–9 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40477-016-0230-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40477-016-0230-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation