Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Issues in Screening for Developmental Delay or Disorders

  • Screening (J Cairney, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Developmental Disorders Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Screening programs for various medical and psychological difficulties are becoming more prevalent. Their appeal is obvious: problems that are caught early should be easier to treat and do not lead to secondary and tertiary sequelae. However, there are a number of problems that may be associated with mass screening. These include the psychometric properties of the tests themselves, which may not have adequate sensitivity and specificity. Second, even if the tests do meet minimal criteria for validity, the low prevalence of many disorders means that the majority of cases that are identified will actually be false positives. This in turn leads to additional financial costs, because of the added work load and the necessity of determining who are not cases as well as psychological costs due to labeling. The final difficulty is that the effectiveness of the interventions needs to be evidence-based. Recommendations are made regarding when screening programs should be implemented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Green M, Palfrey J, editors. Bright futures: guidelines for health supervision of infants, children and adolescent. 2nd ed. Arlington, VA: National Center for Education in Maternal and Child. Health; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  2. National Association of School Nurses. Postural screening guidelines for school nurses. Scarborough, ME: National Association of School Nurses; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Nipissing District Developmental Screen. Nipissing District Developmental Screen Intellectual Property Association; 2000. North Bay: ndds. Available: www.ndds.ca. Accessed 15 Feb 2016.

  4. Streiner DL, Norman GR. Mass screening: when does it make sense? Commun Oncol. 2010;7:93–5. doi:10.1016/S1548-5315(11)70562-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Streiner DL, Norman GR, Cairney J. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Veldhuizen S, Clinton J, Rodriguez C, Wade TJ, Cairney J. Concurrent validity of the ages and stages and Bayley developmental scales in a general population. Acad Pediatr. 2015;15:231–7. doi:10.1016/j.acap.2014.08.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Baines CJ, Miller AB, Wall C, McFarlane DV, Simor IS, Jong R, Shapiro BJ, Audet L, Petitclerc M, Ouimet-Oliva D. Sensitivity and specificity of first screen mammography in the Canadian National Breast Screening Study: a preliminary report from five centers. Radiology. 1986;160:295–8. doi:10.1148/radiology.160.2.3523590.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Oeffinger KC, Fontham ETH, Etzioni R, Herzig A, Michaelson JS, Shih YCT, et al. Breast cancer screening for women at average risk: 2015 guideline update from the American Cancer Society. JAMA. 2015;14:1599–614. doi:10.1001/jama.2015.12783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Siu AL. Screening for autism spectrum disorder in young children: US preventive services task force recommendation statement. JAMA. 2016;315:691–6. doi:10.1001/jama.2016.0018.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cantwell DP, Baker L. Stability and natural history of DSM-III childhood diagnoses. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1999;28:691–700. doi:10.1097/00004583-198909000-00009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zahl PH, Mæhlen J, Welch G. The natural history of invasive breast cancers detected by screening mammography. Arch Intern Med. 2008;168:2311–6. doi:10.1001/archinte.168.21.2311.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gates TJ. Screening for cancer: evaluating the evidence. Am Fam Physician. 2001;63:513–23.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ahn HS, Kim HJ, Welch G. Korea’s thyroid-cancer “epidemic”—screening and overdiagnosis. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:1765–7. doi:10.1056/NEJM p1409841.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cadman D, Chambers LW, Walter SD, Ferguson R, Johnson N, McNamee MA. Evaluation of public health preschool child developmental screening: the process and outcomes of a community program. Am J Public Health. 1987;77:45–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Strandberg TE, Salomaa VV, Naukkarinen VA, Vanhanen HT, Sarna SJ, Miettinen TA, et al. Long-term mortality after 5-year multifactorial primary prevention of cardiovascular diseases in middle-aged men. JAMA. 1991;266:1225–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bergman AB, Stamm SJ. The morbidity of cardiac nondisease in schoolchildren. N Engl J Med. 1967;276:1008–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Cuckle HS, Ward NJ. Principles of screening. In: Wald NJ, Leck I, editors. Antenatal and prenatal screening. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1984.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. St. Joseph’s Healthcare, McMaster University, Mountain Campus, 100 West 5th Street, Box 585, Hamilton, ON, L8N 3K7, Canada

    David L. Streiner

  2. University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

    David L. Streiner

Authors
  1. David L. Streiner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David L. Streiner.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

David L. Streiner declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Screening

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Streiner, D.L. Issues in Screening for Developmental Delay or Disorders. Curr Dev Disord Rep 3, 180–183 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40474-016-0089-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40474-016-0089-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation