Skip to main content
Log in

A Nash game approach to mixed \(\mathcal {H}_{2}/\mathcal {H}_{\infty }\) model predictive control: part 1—state feedback linear system

  • Published:
International Journal of Dynamics and Control Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, the mixed \(\mathcal {H}_{2}/\mathcal {H}_{\infty }\) model predictive control (MPC) using Nash game approach for linear systems is proposed (Aadaleesan in PhD Dissertation, IIT Guwahati 2011, Aadaleesan and Saha in Proceedings of annual meeting of American institute of chemical engineers. Philadelphia 2008). Two-player game strategy is adopted by using two separate cost functions, viz., \(\mathcal {H}_{2}\) and \(\mathcal {H}_{\infty }\) cost functions for the minimizing and maximizing players of the game, respectively. The problem ultimately reduces to solving a pair of cross-coupled Riccati equations. Although solving the coupled Riccati equations resulting from LQ games is by itself of theoretical importance, in the present work it has been extended, for the first of its kind, to the regime of receding horizon control. Numerical examples are provided for disturbance rejection case to check the efficiency of the present algorithm against another established robust MPC (Orukpe et al. in Proceedings of American control conference. New York, pp 6147–6150 2007).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. \(f^*\) represents the optimal value of f.

  2. At steady state \(x_{k|k}=x_{k+1|k}\) and hence \(P_{k}^{(.)}=P_{k+1}^{(.)}\).

  3. Solving the coupled non-symmetric difference Riccati equations from a finite horizon LQ game, even numerically, is intractable.

References

  1. Orukpe PE, Jaimoukha IM, El-Zobaidi HMH (2007) Model predictive control based on mixed \({\cal H}_2/{\cal H}_{\infty }\) control approach. In: Proceedings of American Control Conference. New York, pp 6147–6150

  2. Kothare MV, Balakrishnan V, Morari M (1996) Robust constrained robust model predictive control using linear matrix inequalities. Automatica 32:1361–1379

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Bernstein D, Haddad WM (1989) LQG control with an \({{\cal H}}_{\infty }\) performance bound: a Riccati equation approach. IEEE Trans Autom Control 39:293–305

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Bouyer P, Brenguier R, Markey N, Ummels M (2012) Concurrent games with ordered objectives. In: Proceedings of the 15th international conference on Foundations of Software Science and Computation Structures (FoSSaCS’12). Tallinn, pp 301–315

  5. Ning G, Tie L, Cai KY, Wu XY (2012) Nash equilibrium solutions of tracking game for bilinear systems with exponential reference signals. Optim Control Appl Methods 34:608–622

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Vamvoudakis KG, Vrabie D, Lewis FL (2012) Adaptive optimal control algorithm for zero-sum nash games with integral reinforcement learning. In: Proceesings of AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference. Minneapolis, p 4773

  7. Limebeer DJN, Anderson BDO, Hendel B (1994) A Nash game approach to mixed \({\cal H}_2\) and \({\cal H}_{\infty }\) control. IEEE Trans Autom Control 39(1):69–82

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Freiling G, Jank G, Abou-Kandil H (1999) Discrete-time Riccati equations in open-loop Nash and Stackelberg games. Eur J Control 5:56–66

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Jacob E (2005) LQ dynamic optimization and differential games. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  10. Aadaleesan P (2011) Nash game based mixed \({\cal H}_{2}/{\cal H}_{\infty }\) model predictive control applied with Laguerre-wavelet network model. PhD Dissertation, IIT Guwahati

  11. Aadaleesan P, Saha P (2008) Mixed \({\cal H}_{2}/{\cal H}_{\infty }\) model predictive control for unstable and non-minimum constrained processes. In: Proceedings of annual meeting of American Institute of Chemical Engineers. Philadelphia

  12. Freiling G (2002) A survey of nonsymmetric Riccati equations. Linear Algebra Appl 351–352:243–270

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Freiling G, Ionescu V (1999) Nonsymmetric discrete-time difference and algebraic Riccati equations: some representation formulae and comments. Dynam Systems Appl 8:421–437

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Chen X, Zhou K (1998) \({\cal H}_{\infty }\) Gaussian control design. In: Proceedings of the 37th IEEE conference on decision and control. IEEE Control Systems Society, Piscataway, New Jersy, pp 638–643

  15. Simaan M, Cruz JB Jr (1973) Sampled-data Nash controls in non-zero-sum differental games. Int J Control 17(6):1201–1209

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Başar T (1989) A dynamic games approach to controller design: disturbance rejection in discrete time. In: Proceesings of 28th- IEEE Conference on Decision and Control. Florida, pp 75–84

  17. Başar T, Olsder GJ (1999) Dynamic noncooperative game theory. SIAM, Philadelphia

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Higham NJ (2002) Accuracy and stability of numerical algorithms. SIAM, Philadelphia

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Aadaleesan P, Saha P (2016) A Nash game approach to mixed \({\cal{H}}_{2}/{\cal{H}}_{\infty }\) model predictive control: part 2–stability and robustness. Int J Dyn Control. doi:10.1007/s40435-016-0259-5

    Google Scholar 

  20. Benzaouia A, Hmamed A (1993) Regulator problem for linear continuous-time systems with nonsymmetrical constrained control. IEEE Trans Autom Control 38(10):1556–1560

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Benzaouia A, Burgat G (1989) Existence of non-symmetrical Lyapunov functions for linear systems. Linear Algebra Appl 121:217–231

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Freiling G, Lee SR, Jank G, Sarychev AV (1996) Sufficient conditions for the existence of open loop Nash and Stackelberg strategies. In: Proceedings of controlo’96. Porto, pp 121–126

  23. Scokaert POM, Mayne DQ, Rawlings JB (1999) Sub-optimal model predictive control (feasibility implies stability). IEEE Trans Autom Control 44(3):648–654

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Abou-Kandil H, Bertrand P (1986) Analytic solution for a class of linear-quadratic open-loop Nash games. Int J Control 43(3):997–1002

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Abou-Kandil H, Bertrand P, Drouin M (1986) A closed form solution for discrete-time linear-quadratic games. In: Proceedings of the 4th IFAC/IFORS symposium on large scale systems: theory and applications. Zürich, pp 786–790

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Prabirkumar Saha.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aadaleesan, P., Saha, P. A Nash game approach to mixed \(\mathcal {H}_{2}/\mathcal {H}_{\infty }\) model predictive control: part 1—state feedback linear system. Int. J. Dynam. Control 5, 1063–1072 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40435-016-0261-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40435-016-0261-y

Keywords

Navigation