Abstract
This article presents two methods for evaluating the strength of the hood of railway locomotives. The hood is subject to the European standards for railway applications EN 12663-1 Railway applications Structural requirements of railway vehicle bodies Part 1: Locomotives and passenger rolling stock. Czech Standards Institute (2010). The first method is based on the European standard for railway applications EN 12663-1 Railway applications Structural requirements of railway vehicle bodies Part 1: Locomotives and passenger rolling stock. Czech Standards Institute (2010). This method is based on the principle of evaluation of the pseudo-elastic stress. The second method uses the results of geometrically and materially nonlinear numerical analyses. The second method is based on the knowledge of modern science and technology. Structural strength is then evaluated from the real limit state. Using both methods for strength evaluating is shown in this paper (strength evaluation of hood of diesel electric locomotive). The original construction of the hood is analyzed in the first part of this paper. Structural changes are proposed in the next part of this article. The carrying capacity of the new construction of the hood is verified by a numerical analysis. The results of the new construction are compared with the original construction of the hood
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- a :
-
Acceleration \((\mathrm{ms}^{-2})\)
- \(a_{ALL}\) :
-
Allowable acceleration \((\mathrm{ms}^{-2})\)
- \(a_L\) :
-
Limit acceleration \((\mathrm{ms}^{-2})\)
- \(a_x\) :
-
Acceleration in the direction of the x axis \((\mathrm{ms}^{-2})\)
- E :
-
Young’s modulus in tension \((\mathrm{Nmm}^{-2})\)
- \(E_T\) :
-
Tangent modulus \((\mathrm{Nmm}^{-2})\)
- \(f_y\) :
-
Yield strength \((\mathrm{Nmm}^{-2})\)
- \(f_u\) :
-
Ultimate strength \((\mathrm{Nmm}^{-2})\)
- g :
-
Acceleration of gravity \((\mathrm{ms}^{-2})\)
- \(S_1\) :
-
Safety factor given the yield strength (l)
- \(S_2\) :
-
Safety factor given the ultimate strength (l)
- \(S_3\) :
-
Safety factor for loss of stability (l)
- \(S_f\) :
-
Fictitious safety factor (l)
- T :
-
Calculation temperature \((^\circ \mathrm{C})\)
- \(W_{pl}\) :
-
Plastic cross section modulus in bending \((\mathrm{mm}^3)\)
- \(W_{el}\) :
-
Elastic cross section modulus in bending \((\mathrm{mm}^3)\)
- \(\mu\) :
-
Poisson’s number \((-)\)
- \(\sigma _{ALL}\) :
-
Allowable elastic stress \((\mathrm{Nmm}^{-2})\)
- \(\sigma _{int}\) :
-
Reduced stress by hypothesis Tresca \((\mathrm{Nmm}^{-2})\)
References
EN 12663-1 (2010) Railway applications Structural requirements of railway vehicle bodies Part 1: Locomotives and passenger rolling stock. Czech Standards Institute (in Czech)
FEM Computer program SolidWorks/Simulation (COSMOSWorks) (2014) Advanced Professional. SolidWorks Corporation
EN 1993-1 (2006) Design of steel structures. European Standards
Paščenko P (2009) Stability of thin-walled shell structures in transport technology, Habilitation thesis, University of Pardubice Pardubice
Esslinger M,Geier B (1975) Postbuckling Behavior of Structures, Springer-Verlag, Wien-New York, Udine (ISBN 3-211-81369-1)
Bushnell D (1985) Computerized buckling analysis of shells, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht (ISBN 90-247-3099-6)
Křupka V, Paščenko P (1995) Influence of imperfection on the Snap-Through of Flat Conical Roof Stiffened by Meridional Stringers, Thin-Walled Structures 23. Elsevier Science Limites (ISSN 0263–8231:123–130)
ECCS Buckling of Steel Shells (2008) European Design Recommendations, Fifth edition, Published by ECCS (ISBN 92-9147-000-92)
Volmir AC (1956) Flexible Plates and Shells, (in Russian). State Publishing House of Technical/Theoretical Literature, Moscow
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Technical Editor: Fernando Antonio Forcellini.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tomek, P., Středová, D. Proposal of a new method for strength evaluating of construction of railway vehicles. J Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 39, 235–244 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-016-0550-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-016-0550-6