Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Multi-objective optimization of laser curve cutting of aluminium metal matrix composites using desirability function approach

  • Technical Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The machining of aluminium metal matrix composite (MMC) material reinforced with SiC particles has been identified as typical process with traditional machining process. In the present study, curve cutting has been performed on the MMC material using CO2 laser cutting system. The investigations have been carried out to identify the thermal effects of SiC particles on surface roughness and kerf deviation. To optimize the quality characteristics, the response surface model is formulated using desirability functional approach. The optimal settings of various input variables have been identified for quality characteristics. The input parameters like cutting speed, reinforced particles and arc radius have been examined as significant factors. The adequacy of predicted response surface model was verified by performing the set of experiments and predicted error percentage method. The formation of recast layer and new phase Al4C3 was detected using SEM and XRD plot, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

A :

Cutting speed (mm/min)

B :

Laser power (watt)

C :

Standoff distance (mm)

D :

Nozzle diameter (mm)

E :

Gas pressure (bar)

F :

Reinforced particles (%)

G :

Arc radius (mm)

K d :

Kerf deviation (mm)

K w :

Kerf width (mm)

MMC:

Metal matrix composite

R z :

Surface roughness (µm)

RSM:

Response surface methology

t :

Specimen thickness (mm)

References

  1. Rosso M (2006) Ceramic and metal matrix composites: route and properties. J Mater Process Technol 175:364–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Srivatsan TS, Al-Hajri M, Smith C, Petraroli M (2003) The tensile response and fracture behavior of 2009 aluminium alloy metal matrix composite. Mater Sci Eng 346:91–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ozden S, Ekici R, Nair F (2007) Investigation of impact behaviour of aluminium based SiC particle reinforced metal–matrix composites. Compos Part A 38:484–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Yan B, Tsai HC, Huang Y, Lee LC (2005) Examination of wire electrical discharge machining of Al2O3p/6061Al composites. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 45:251–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Venkata B, Ganguly I, Srinivasarao G, Sahoo L (2013) Machinability of aluminum metal matrix composite reinforced with in-situ ceramic composite developed from mines waste colliery shale. Mater Manuf Proc 28:1082–1089

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mazahery A, Shabani MO (2013) Development of the principle of simulated natural evolution in searching for a more superior solution: proper selection of processing parameters in AMCs. Powder Technol 245:146–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tofigh A, Shabani MO (2013) Efficient optimum solution for high strength Al alloys matrix composites. Ceram Int 39:7483–7490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mazahery A, Shabani MO (2012) Assistance of novel artificial intelligence in optimization of aluminum matrix nanocomposite by genetic algorithm. Metall Mater Trans A 43:5279–5285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Shabani MO, Mazahery A (2013) Fabrication of AMCs by spray forming: setting of cognition and social parameters to accelerate the convergence in optimization of spray forming process. Ceram Int 39:5271–5279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mazahery A, Alizadeh M (2012) Study of tribological and mechanical properties of A356-nano SiC composites. Trans Indian Inst Met 65:393–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sharma A, Yadava V, Rao R (2010) Optimization of kerf quality characteristics during Nd:YAG laser cutting of nickel based super alloy sheet for straight and curved cut profiles. Opt Lasers Eng 48:915–925

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Pandey AK, Dubey AK (2013) Fuzzy expert system for prediction of kerf qualities in pulsed laser cutting of titanium alloy sheet. Mach Sci Tech 17:545–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ghosal A, Manna A (2013) Response surface method based optimization of ytterbium fiber laser parameter during machining of Al/Al2O3-MMC. Opt Lasers Eng 46:67–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Liming L, Meili Z, Desheng X, Tao W (2002) Study of the interfacial reaction of SiC-Al in 6061Al reinforced with SiC whisker at laser beam. Compos Interfaces 9:135–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Yilbas BS, Khan S, Raza K, Demir T, Karakas MS (2010) Laser cutting of 7050 Al alloy reinforced with Al2O3 and B4C composites. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 50:185–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lau WS, Yue TM, Lee TC, Lee WB (1995) Un-conventional machining of composite materials. J Mater Proc Technol 48:199–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sharma A, Vinod Y (2011) Optimization of cut quality characteristics during Nd:YAG laser straight cutting of Ni-based superalloy thin sheet using grey relational analysis with entropy measurement. Mater Manuf Proc 26:1522–1529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Yue TM, Lau WS (1996) Pulsed Nd-YAG laser cutting of Al-Li/SiC metal matrix composites. Mater Manuf Proc 11:17–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Grabowski A, Nowak M, Sleziona J (2008) Laser beam interactions with metal matrix AlSi alloy/SiCp composites. J Achiev Mater Manuf Eng 31:233–240

    Google Scholar 

  20. Rao R, Yadava V (2009) Multi-objective optimization of Nd:YAG laser cutting of thin super alloy sheet using grey relation a analysis with entropy measurement. Opt Laser Tech 41:922–930

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Allmen M, Blatter A (1995) Laser-beam interactions with materials. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  22. Grabowski A, Jozef S, Marian N (2007) Laser cutting of AlSi alloy/SiCp composite: modelling of the cut kerf geometry, In proceeding of SPIE. Laser Tech. doi:10.1117/12.726548

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sharma P, Dubey A, Pandey A (2014) Numerical study of temperature and stress fields in laser cutting of aluminium alloy sheet. Proc Mater Sci 5:1887–1896

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Yan Y, Ji L, Bao Y, Jiang Y (2012) An experimental and numerical study on laser percussion drilling of thick-section alumina. J Mater Proc Tech 212:1257–1270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wang X, Kang R, Xu W, Guo D (2006) Direct laser fabrication of aluminum-alloy slot antenna array. First international symposium on systems and control in aerospace and astronautics, IEEE Cat. No. 06EX1168C, 5

  26. Box P, Behnken DW (1960) Technometrics. Taylor and Francis, United Kingdom

    Google Scholar 

  27. Dong GA, Kyung WB (2009) Influence of cutting parameters on surface characteristics of cut section in cutting of Inconel 718 sheet using CW Nd:YAG laser. Trans Non Ferrous Metal Soc 19:32–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Lamikiz A, Lacalle N, Sanchez A, Pozo D, Etayo M, Lopez M (2005) CO2 laser cutting of advanced high strength steels (AHSS). App Surface Sci 242:362–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Sharma A, Yadava V (2013) Modelling and optimization of cut quality during pulsed Nd:YAG laser cutting of thin Al-alloy sheet for curved profile. Opt Lasers Eng 51:77–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Muller F, Monaghan J (2001) Non-conventional machining of particle reinforced metal matrix composites. J Mater Proc Tech 118:278–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Riveiro A, Quintero F, Lusquinos F, Comesana R, Pou J (2010) Influence of assist gas nature on the surfaces obtained by laser cutting of Al–Cu alloys. Surf Coat Tech 205:1878–1885

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Yigezu BS, Mahapatra MM, Jha KP (2013) Influence of reinforcement type on microstructure, hardness, and tensile properties of an aluminum alloy metal matrix composite. J Min Mater Charact Eng 1:124–130

    Google Scholar 

  33. Derringer G, Suich R (1980) Simultaneous optimization of several response variables. J Qual Technol 12:214–219

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are highly thankful to Sophisticated Analytical Instrument Laboratories (SAI Labs), Patiala, India for giving permission to conduct the various laboratory tests.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Chandigarh University, Mohali, Punjab, India

    Vikas Sharma

  2. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Thapar University, Patiala, Punjab, India

    Vinod Kumar

Authors
  1. Vikas Sharma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Vinod Kumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vinod Kumar.

Additional information

Technical Editor: Sadek C. Absi Alfaro.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sharma, V., Kumar, V. Multi-objective optimization of laser curve cutting of aluminium metal matrix composites using desirability function approach. J Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 38, 1221–1238 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-016-0487-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-016-0487-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation