Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Failure mechanisms of scarf-repaired composite laminates under tensile load

  • Technical Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An investigation based on experimental and finite element (FE) studies was carried out to understand the failure mechanisms of scarf-repaired T700SC/NY9200GA composite laminates under tensile load. Test specimens were categorized into 4 groups based on the type of scarf patch (pre-preg and pre-formed) and scarf angles (6°and 10°). A 3-D progressive damage accumulation model was developed to understand the damage mechanisms and predict the ultimate strength of repaired laminates. Damage characteristics of specimens were observed by optical microscope and scanning electron microscopy. Test results have shown that the laminates repaired with pre-preg scarf patch and 6° scarf angle have higher failure strength. It was also found that the fracture morphology of failed laminate is different but failure mode was found to be the same. The crack initiated from highly stressed adhesive regions and then circumferentially propagated throughout the adhesive interface thus causing adhesive failure. FE results were found to be in good agreement with experimental results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hull D (1987) An introduction to composite materials. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hou WG, Zhang WF, Ding ML, Liu X, Wang ZR (2010) Thermal deplying technology of damaged area in carbon fiber/bismaleimide resin laminates. In: The proceedings of 2010 Asia-Pacific international symposium on aerospace technology, vol. 2. pp 865–868

  3. Hou WG, Zhang WF, Tang QY (2012) Progress in patch repair of aerospace composite structures. Proc. SPIE 8409, Third international conference on smart materials and nanotechnology in engineering. doi:10.1117/12.923795

  4. Chen SJ (2001) Guide of composite structure repair. Aviation Industry Press, Beijing [in Chinese]

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wang CH, Gunnion AJ (2008) On the design methodology of scarf repairs to composite laminates. Compos Sci Technol 68(1):35–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Found MS, Friend MJ (1955) Evaluation of CFRP panels with scarf repair patches. Compos Struct 32(1–4):115–122

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jones JS, Graves SR (1984) Repair techniques for Celion/LARC-160 graphite/polyimide composite structures. Langley Research Center, United States NASA-CR-3794

    Google Scholar 

  8. Meng FH, Chen SJ, Tong XY (2001) Selection of the design parameters in laminate repair. Acta Materiae Compos Sin 18(4):123–127 [in Chinese]

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kumar SB, Sridhar I, Sivashanker SI et al (2006) Tensile failure of adhesively bonded CFRP composite scarf joints. Mater Sci Eng B Solid State Mater Adv Technol 132(1–2):113–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kumar SB, Sivashanker SI, Osiyemi SO et al (2005) Failure of aerospace composite scarf-joints subjected to uniaxial compression. Mater Sci Eng A 412(1–2):117–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Pipes RB, Adkins DW, Deaton J (1982) Strength and repair of bonded scarf joints for repair of composite materials. NASA Langley Research Center, United States. MSG 1304

  12. Soutis C, Hu FZ (1998) Failure analysis of scarf-patch-repaired carbon fiber/epoxy laminates under compression. AIAA J 38(4):737–740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Odi RA, Friend CM (2004) An improved 2-D model for bonded composite joints. Int J Adhes Adhes 24(5):389–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Campilho RDSG, de Moura MFSF, Domingues JJMS (2007) Stress and failure analyses of scarf repaired CFRP laminates using a cohesive damage model. J Adhes Sci Technol 21(9):855–870

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Tzetzis D, Hogg PJ (2008) Experimental and finite element analysis on the performance of vacuum-assisted resin infused single scarf repairs. Mater Des 29(2):436–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Yu M, Xu XW (2008) Study of the compression strength of scarf patch repaired composite structures. J China Univ Min Technol 37(5):711–714 [in Chinese]

    Google Scholar 

  17. Adkins DW, Pipes RB (1985) End effects in scarf joints. Compos Sci Technol 22(3):209–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gunnion AJ, Herszberg I (2006) Parametric study of scarf joints in composite structures. Compos Struct 75(1–4):364–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Dong Z, Zhong PD, Tao CH (2003) Failure analysis. National defense industry, Beijing [in Chinese]

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wang YL (2011) Study on scarf repair to composite laminates. Master Degree thesis, Beihang University

  21. Wang YL, Cheng XQ (2010) Influence of scarf angle on composite scarf repair under a tensile load. Transformation of economic development mode and self-dependent innovation, the twelfth annual meeting of China association for science and technology, vol. II

  22. Hashin Z (1980) Failure criteria for unidirectional fiber composites. J Appl Mech 47:329–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Change FK, Springer GS (1986) The strengths of fiber reinforced composite bends. Compos Mater 20:30–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Cheng X Q Study on compressive properties of composite laminates and honeycomb core sandwich panels after low speed impact. Ph.D thesis, Beihang

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, No. 37 Xueyuan Road, Beijing, 100191, China

    Yasir Baig, Xiaoquan Cheng & Musharaf Abbas

  2. International Islamic University, H-10, Islamabad, 44000, Pakistan

    Hasan Junaid Hasham & Musharaf Abbas

  3. Wah Engineering College, Wah Cantt, 47040, Pakistan

    Wajid Ali Khan

Authors
  1. Yasir Baig
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xiaoquan Cheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hasan Junaid Hasham
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Musharaf Abbas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Wajid Ali Khan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Musharaf Abbas.

Additional information

Technical Editor: Fernando Antonio Forcellini.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Baig, Y., Cheng, X., Hasham, H.J. et al. Failure mechanisms of scarf-repaired composite laminates under tensile load. J Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 38, 2069–2075 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-015-0460-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-015-0460-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation