Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Elastic fractal trees: a correspondence among geometry, stress, resilience and material quantity

  • Technical Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A two-dimensional elastic fractal tree model is proposed considering the trunk clamped to the ground and extremities under the action of moments. For the proposed problem the normal stress is lower in the trunk and higher in the extremities. The limiting case in which stress is constant in all orders corresponds to the physiological principle of minimum work proposed by Murray (Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 12:207–214, 1926). When longitudinal and transverse proportions coincide the tree is said to be geometrically similar. Geometric similarity, constancy of stress, uniform distribution of elastic energy and of material quantity among orders occur in group. These four states are correlated to each other: the occurrence of two implies that the other two also occur. The proposed approach considers both individual and systemic properties and highlights the inherent connection among them. Flexibility is shown to increase from the trunk to the extremities. Considering a stochastic distribution of external moments the branching design is shown to minimize relative dispersion of stress while concentrating forces through the trunk.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barros MM (2011) Fractal dimensions of physical phenomena associated to geometric fractal systems (in portuguese), D.Sc. thesis, Laboratório Nacional de Computação Científica, LNCC, Brazil

  2. Bassingthwaighte JB, Liebovitch LS, West BJ (1994) Fractal physiology. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Bevilacqua L, Barros MM, Galeão ACNR (2008) Geometry, dynamics and fractals. J Brazil Soc Mech Sci Eng 30(1):11–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bevilacqua L, Barros MM (2011) Dynamical characterization of mixed fractal structures. J Mech Mater Struct 6:51–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Benyus JM (1997) Biomimicry: innovation inspired by nature. William Morrow & Company Inc, New York

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dahle GA, Grabosky JC (2009) Review of literature on the function and allometric relationships of tree stems and branches. Arboric Urban For 35(6):311–320

    Google Scholar 

  7. Feder J (1988) Fractals. Plenum Press, New York and London

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Kassab GS (2005) Scaling laws of vascular trees: of form and function. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 290:H894–H903

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mandelbrott B (1982) The fractal geometry of nature. W. H. Freeman and Co., New York

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mauroy B, Filoche M, Weibel ER, Sapoval B (2004) The optimal bronchial tree may be dangerous. Nature 427:633–636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. McCulloh KA, Sperry JS, Adler FR (2003) Water transport in plants obeys Murray’s law. Nature 421:939–942

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. McMahon T (1973) Size and shape in biology. Science 179(4079):1201–1204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Murray CD (1926) The physiological principle of minimum work: I. The vascular system and the cost of blood. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 12:207–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Nonnenmacher TF, Losa GA, Weibel ER (1993) Fractals in biology and medicine. Birkhuser Verlag, Basel

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rossitti S, Lofgren J (1993) Vascular dimensions of the cerebral arteries follow the principle of minimum work. Stroke J Am Heart Assoc 24:371–377

    Google Scholar 

  16. Schroeder M (1991) Fractals chaos, power laws. W. H. Freeman and Company, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Sherman TF (1981) On connecting large vessels to small: the meaning of Murray’s law. J General Physiol 78:431–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Thompson D’AW (1971) On growth and form. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zhi W, Ming Z, Qi-Xing Y (2001) Modeling of branching structures of plants. J Theor Biol 209:383–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was partially supported by the CNPq (National Research Council) and FAPERJ (Rio de Janeiro Research Foundation) through research projects.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcelo Miranda Barros.

Additional information

Communicated by Fernando Alves Rochinha.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Barros, M.M., Bevilacqua, L. Elastic fractal trees: a correspondence among geometry, stress, resilience and material quantity. J Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 37, 1479–1483 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-014-0288-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-014-0288-y

Keywords

Navigation