Skip to main content
Log in

Topographic differentiations of biological soil crusts and hydraulic properties in fixed sand dunes, Tengger Desert

  • Published:
Journal of Arid Land Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Biological soil crusts (BSCs) play an important role in surface soil hydrology. Soils dominated with moss BSCs may have higher infiltration rates than those dominated with cyanobacteria or algal BSCs. However, it is unnown whether improved infiltration in moss BSCs is accompanied by an increase in soil hydraulic conductivity or water retention capacity. We investigated this question in the Tengger Desert, where a 43-year-old revegetation program has promoted the formation of two distinct types of BSCs along topographic positions, i.e. the moss-dominated BSCs on the interdune land and windward slopes of the fixed sand dunes, and the algal-dominated BSCs on the crest and leeward slopes. Soil water retention capacity and hydraulic conductivity were measured using an indoor evaporation method and a field infiltration method. And the results were fitted to the van Genuchten-Mualem model. Unsaturated hydraulic conductivities under greater water pressure (<-0.01 MPa) and water retention capacities in the entire pressure head range were higher for both crust types than for bare sand. However, saturated and unsaturated hydraulic conductivities in the near-saturation range (>-0.01 MPa) showed decreasing trends from bare sand to moss crusts and to algal crusts. Our data suggested that topographic differentiation of BSCs significantly affected not only soil water retention and hydraulic conductivities, but also the overall hydrology of the fixed sand dunes at a landscape scale, as seen in the reduction and spatial variability in deep soil water storage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Almog R, Yair A. 2007. Negative and positive effects of topsoil biological crusts on water availability along a rainfall gradient in a sandy arid area. Catena, 70: 437–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belnap J. 2006. The potential roles of biological soil crusts in dryland hydrologic cycles. Hydrological Processes, 20: 3159–3178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berndtsson R, Chen H S. 1994. Variability of soil water content along a transect in a desert area. Journal of Arid Environments, 27: 127–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brotherson J D, Rushforth S R. 1983. Influence of cryptogamic crusts on moisture relationships of soils in Navaip National Monument. Great Basin Naturalist, 43: 73–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duan Z H, Xiao H L, Li X R, et al. 2004. Evolution of soil properties on stabilized sands in the Tengger Desert, China. Geomorphology, 59: 237–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eldridge D J, Zaady E, Shachak M. 2000. Infiltration through three contrasting biological soil crusts in patterned landscapes in the Negev, Israel. Catena, 40: 323–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eldridge D J, Zaady E, Shachak M. 2002. Microphytic crusts, shrub patches and water harvesting in the Negev Desert: the Shikim system. Landscape Ecology, 17: 587–597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eldridge D J, Bowker M A, Maestre F T, et al. 2010. Interactive effects of three ecosystem engineers on infiltration in a semi-arid Mediterranean grassland. Ecosystems, 13: 499–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FAO/UNESCO. 1974. Soil Map of the World 1:5,000,000. Volume 1. Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • George D B, Roundy B A, St. Clair L L, et al. 2003. The effects of microbiotic soil crusts on soil water loss. Arid Land Research and Management, 17: 113–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halbertsma J M, Veerman G J. 1997. Determination of the unsaturated conductivity and water retention characteristics using the Wind’s evaporation method. In Stolte J. Manual for Soil Physical Measurements. Wageningen: DLO Winand Staring Centre, 47–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu C X, Liu Y D, Zhang D L, et al. 2002. Cementing mechanism of algal crusts from desert area. Chinese Science Bulletin, 47: 1361–1368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu W, Shao M A, Wang Q J, et al. 2009. Temporal changes of soil hydraulic properties under different land uses. Geoderma, 149: 355–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kidron G J, Yair A, Vonshak A, et al. 2003. Microbiotic crust control of runoff generation on sand dunes in the Negev Desert. Water Resource Research, 39: 1108–1112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kidron G J. 2007. Millimeter-scale microrelief affecting runoff yield over microbiotic crust in the Negev Desert. Catena, 70: 266–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li T, Xiao H L, Li X R. 2001. Modeling the effects of crust on rain infiltration in vegetated sand dunes in arid desert. Arid Land Research and Management, 15: 41–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li X R, Ma F Y, Xiao H L, et al. 2004. Long-term ecosystem effects of vegetation on soil water content of sand dunes in arid region of Northern China. Journal of Arid Environments, 57: 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li X R, Jia X H, Long L Q, et al. 2005. Effect of biological soil crusts on seed bank, germination and establishment of two annual plant species in the Tengger Desert (China). Plant and Soil, 27: 375–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li X R, He M Z, Stefan Z, et al. 2010. Micro-geomorphology determines community structure of BSCs at small scale. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 35: 932–940.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li X R, Jia R L, Chen Y W, et al. 2011. Association of ant nests with successional stages of biological soil crusts in the Tengger Desert, Northern China. Applied Soil Ecology, 47: 59–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li X R, GaoY H, Su J Q, et al. 2014. Ants mediate soil water in arid desert ecosystems: Mitigating rainfall interception induced by biological soil crusts? Applied Soil Ecology, 78: 57–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu L C, Song Y X, Gao Y H, et al. 2007. Effects of microbiotic crusts on evaporation from the revegetated area in a Chinese desert. Australia Journal of Soil Research, 45: 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maestre F T, Huesca M T, Zaady E, et al. 2002. Infiltration, penetration resistance and microphytic crust composition in contrasted microsites within a Mediterranean semi-arid steppe. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 34: 895–898.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malam I O, Défarge C, Trichet J, et al. 2009. Microbiotic soil crusts in the Sahel of western Niger and their influence on soil porosity and water dynamics. Catena, 77: 48–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mualem Y. 1976. A new model for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated porous media. Water Resource Research, 12: 513–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapotou Desert Research and Experiment Station, Chinese Academy of Sciences. 1991. Study on Shifting Sand Control in Shapotou Region of Tengger Desert (2). Yingchuan: Ningxia People’s Press, 101–106. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Šimûnek J, Wendroth O, van Genuchten M T. 1998. A parameter estimation analysis of the evaporation method for determining soil hydraulic properties. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 62: 894–905.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Su Y G, Li X R, Cheng Y W, et al. 2007. Effects of biological soil crusts on emergence of desert vascular plants in North China. Plant Ecology, 191: 11–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Genuchten M T H. 1980. A close-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 44: 892–898.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang X P, Li X R, Xiao H L, et al. 2006. Evolutionary characteristics of the artificially revegetated shrub ecosystem in the Tengger Desert, Northern China. Ecological Research, 21: 415–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang X P, Li X R, Xiao H L, et al. 2007a. Effects of surface characteristics on infiltration patterns in an arid shrub desert. Hydrological Processes, 21: 72–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang X P, Young H M. Yu Z, et al. 2007b. Long-term effects of restoration on soil hydraulic properties in revegetation stabilized desert ecosystems. Geophysical Research Letters, 34: L24S22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren S D. 2003. Synopsis: influence of biological soil crusts on arid land hydrology and soil stability. In: Belnap J, Lange O L. Biological Soil Crusts: Structure, Function, and Management. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 349–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • West N E. 1990. Structure and function of microphytic soil crusts in wildland ecosystems of arid to semi-arid regions. Advances in Ecological Research, 20: 179–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams J D, Dobrowolski J P, West N E. 1999. Microbiotic crust influence on unsaturated hydraulic conductivity. Arid Soil Research and Rehabilitation, 13: 145–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y M, Wu N, Zhang B C, et al. 2010. Species composition, distribution patterns and ecological functions of biological soil crusts in the Gurbantunggut Desert. Journal of Arid Land, 2(3): 180–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Z S, Liu L C, Li X R, et al. 2008. Evaporation properties of a revegetated area of the Tengger Desert, North China. Journal of Arid Environments, 72: 964–973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to ZhiShan Zhang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, Z., Chen, Y., Xu, B. et al. Topographic differentiations of biological soil crusts and hydraulic properties in fixed sand dunes, Tengger Desert. J. Arid Land 7, 205–215 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40333-014-0048-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40333-014-0048-y

Keywords

Navigation