Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Fractal features of soil profiles under different land use patterns on the Loess Plateau, China

  • Published:
Journal of Arid Land Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fractal theory is becoming an increasingly useful tool to describe soil structure dynamics for a better understanding of the performance of soil systems. Changes in land use patterns significantly affect soil physical, chemical and biological properties. However, limited information is available on the fractal characteristics of deep soil layers under different land use patterns. In this study, the fractal dimensions of particle size distribution (PSD) and micro-aggregates in the 0–500 cm soil profile and soil anti-erodibility in the 0–10 cm soil profile for 10 typical land use patterns were investigated in the Zhifanggou Watershed on the Loess Plateau, China. The 10 typical land use patterns were: slope cropland, two terraced croplands, check-dam cropland, woodland, two shrublands, orchard, artificial and natural grasslands. The results showed that the fractal dimensions of PSD and micro-aggregates were all significantly influenced by soil depths, land use patterns and their interaction. The plantations of shrubland, woodland and natural grassland increased the amount of larger micro-aggregates, and decreased the fractal dimensions of micro-aggregates in the 0–40 cm soil profile. And they also improved the aggregate state and aggregate degree and decreased dispersion rate in the 0–10 cm soil profile. The results indicated that fractal theory can be used to characterize soil structure under different land use patterns and fractal dimensions of micro-aggregates were more effective in this regard. The natural grassland may be the best choice for improving soil structure in the study area.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmadi A, Neyshabouri M, Rouhipour H, et al. 2011. Fractal dimension of soil aggregates as an index of soil erodibility. Journal of Hydrology, 400: 305–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson A N, McBratney A B, Crawford J W. 1997. Application of fractals to soil studies. Advances in Agronomy, 63: 1–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayres Q C. 1936. Soil Erosion and its Control. New York: McGram-Hill: 20–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basic F, Kisic I, Mesic M, et al. 2004. Tillage and crop management effects on soil erosion in central Croatia. Soil and Tillage Research, 78(2): 197–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baver L D, Rhoades H F. 1932. Aggregate analysis as an aid in the study of soil structure relationships. Journal of the American Society of Agronomy, 24: 920–930.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bremner J M, Mulvaney C S. 1982. Nitrogen-total. Agronomy monography 9. In: Page A L, Miller R H, Keeney D R. Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2, Chemical and Microbial Properties, Madison: Agronomy Society of America, 595–624.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caravaca F, Masciandaro G, Ceccanti B. 2002. Land use in relation to soil chemical and biochemical properties in a semiarid Mediterranean environment. Soil and Tillage Research, 68(1): 23–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clifton J, Mcdonald P, Plater A, et al. 1999. An investigation into the efficiency of particle size separation using stokes’ law. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 24(8): 725–730.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dang Y A, Li S Q, Wang G D, et al. 2009. Fractal characteristics of soil particle composition for typical types of soil profile on Loess Plateau. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agriculture Engineering, 25(9): 74–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erskine W D, Mahmoudzadeh A, Myers C. 2002. Land use effects on sediment yields and soil loss rates in small basins of Triassic sandstone near Sydney, NSW, Australia. Catena. 49(4): 271–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Filgueira R R, Fournier L L, Cerisola C I, et al. 2006. Particle-size distribution in soils: a critical study of the fractal model validation. Geoderma, 134(3–4):327–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao L, Shao M A. 2012. Temporal stability of soil water storage in diverse soil layers. Catena, 95: 24–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grout H, Tarquis A M, Wiesner M R. 1998. Multifractal analysis of particle size distributions in soil. Environmental Science and Technology, 32(9): 1176–1182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gui D W, Lei J Q, Zeng F J, et al. 2010. Characterizing variations in soil particle size distribution in oasis farmlands-A case study of the Cele Oasis. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 51: 1306–1311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kravchenko A, Zhang R D. 1998. Estimating the soil water retention from particle-size distribution: a fractal approach. Soil Science, 163(3): 171–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li D C, Zhang T L. 2000. Fractal features of particle-size distribution of soils in China. Soil and Environmental Sciences, 9(4): 263–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu X, Zhang G C, Heathman G C, et al. 2009. Fractal features of soil particle-size distribution as affected by plant communities in the forested region of Mountain Yimeng, China. Geoderma, 154(1–2): 123–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lobe I, Amenlung W, Du Preez C C. 2001. Loesses of carbon and nitrogen with prolonged arable cropping from sandy soils of the South African Highveld. European Journal of Soil Science, 52(1): 93–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mariotte C A, Hudson G, Hamilton D. 1997. Spatial variability of soil total C and N and their stable isotopes in an upland Scottish grassland. Plant and Soil, 196(1): 151–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinez-Mena M, Deeks L K, Williams A G. 1999. An evaluation of fragmentation fractal dimension technique to determine soil erodibility. Geoderma, 90: 87–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millan H, Orellana R. 2001. Mass fractal dimensions of soil aggregates from different depths of a compacted Vertisol. Geoderma, 101(3–4): 65–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millan H, Gonzalez-Posada M, Aguilar M, et al. 2003. On the fractal scaling of soil data. Particle-size distributions. Geoderma, 117(1–2): 117–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montero E. 2005. Rényi dimensions analysis of soil particle-size distributions. Ecological Modelling, 182(3–4): 305–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson D W, Sommers L E. 1982. Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. Agronomy nonograph 9. In: Page A L, Miller H, Keeney D R. Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2, Chemical and Microbial Properties. Madison: Agronomy Society of America, 539–552.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paz-Ferreiro J, Vidal Vazquez E, Miranda J G V. 2010. Assessing soil particle-size distribution on experimental plots with similar texture under different management systems using multifractal parameters. Geoderma, 160(1): 47–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Posadas A N D, Gimenez D, Bittelli M, et al. 2001. Multifractal characterization of soil particle-size distributions. Soil Science Society of American Journal, 65:1361–1367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pulleman M M, Six J, Uyl A, et al. 2005. Earthworms and management affect organic matter incorporation and microaggregate formation in agricultural soils. Applied Soil Ecology, 29(1): 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Su Y Z, Zhao H L, Zhao W Z, et al. 2004. Fractal features of soil particle size distribution and the implication for indicating desertification. Geoderma, 122(1): 43–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turcotte D L. 1986. Fractal and fragmentation. Journal of Geophysical Research, 91:1921–1926.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler S W, Wheatcraft S W. 1989. Application of fractal mathematics to soil water retention estimation. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 53(4): 987–996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler S W, Wheatcraft S W. 1992. Fractal scaling of soil particle-size distributions: analysis and limitations. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 56(2): 362–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang B, Liu G B, Xue S, et al. 2011. Changes in soil physicochemical and microbiological properties during natural succession on abandoned farmland in the Loess Plateau. Environmental Earth Sciences, 62(5): 915–925.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang B, Xue S, Liu G B, et al. 2012. Changes in soil nutrient and enzyme activities under different vegetations in the Loess Plateau area, Northwest China. Catena, 92: 186–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang D, Fu B J, Zhao W W, et al. 2008. Multifractal characteristics of soil particle size distribution under different land-use types on the Loess Plateau, China. Catena, 72(1): 29–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang X D, Li M H, Liu S Z, et al. 2006. Fractal characteristics of soils under different land-use patterns in the arid and semiarid regions of the Tibetan Plateau, China. Geoderma, 134(1–2): 56–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y Q, Zhang X C. Huang C Q. 2009a. Spatial variability of soil total nitrogen and soil total phosphorus under different land uses in a small watershed on the Loess Plateau, China. Geoderma, 150(1–2): 141–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Z Q, Liu B Y, Zhang Y. 2009b. Soil moisture of different vegetation types on the Loess Plateau. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 19(6): 707–718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang G L, Liu G B, Xu M X. 2009c. Above and below ground dynamics of plant community succession following abandonment of farmland on the Loess Plateau, China. Plant and Soil, 316(1–2): 227–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei J, Zhou J, Tian J L, et al. 2006. Decoupling soil erosion and human activities on the Chinese Loess Plateau in the 20th century. Catena, 68(1): 10–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu Y F, Sun D A. 2002. A fractal model for soil pores and its application to determination of water permeability. Physica A, 316: 56–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang P L, Luo Y P, Shi Y C. 1993. Fractal features of soil defined by grain weight distribution. Chinese Science Bulletin, 38(20): 1896–1899.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zalibekov Z G. 2002. Changes in the soil cover as a result of desertification. Eurasian Soil Science, 35(12): 1276–1281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang C, Xue S, Liu G B, et al. 2011. A comparison of soil qualities of different revegation types in the Loess Plateau, China. Plant and Soil, 347(1–2): 163–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang C, Liu G B, Xue S, et al. 2013. Soil organic carbon and total nitrogen storage as affected by land use in a small watershed of the Loess Plateau, China. European Journal of Soil Biology, 54: 16–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Z, Wei C F, Xie D T, et al. 2008. Effects of land use patterns on soil aggregate stability in Sichuan Basin, China. Particuology, 6(3): 157–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao P, Shao M A, Wang T J. 2011. Multifractal analyses of particle-size distributions of alluvial soils in the dam farmland on the Loess Plateau of China. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 6(18): 4177–4184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao S W, Su J, Yang Y H, et al. 2006. A fractal method of estimating soil structure changes under different vegetations on Ziwuling Mountains of the Loess Plateau, China. Agriculture Sciences in China, 5(7): 530–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng Z C, Li T X, Zhang X Z, et al. 2009. Study on the composition and stability of soil aggregates under different land use. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 23(5): 228–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng Z C, He S Q, Li T X. 2011. Fractal dimensions of soil structure and soil anti-erodibility under different land use patterns. African Journal of Agriculture Research, 24(6): 5496–5504.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zou X Y, Li S, Zhang C L, et al. 2002. Desertification and control plan in the Tibet Autonomous Region of China. Journal of Arid Environments, 51(2): 183–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. State Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion and Dryland Farming on the Loess Plateau, Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, 712100, China

    Lie Xiao, Sha Xue, GuoBin Liu & Chao Zhang

  2. Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Chinese Academy of Sciences and Ministry of Water Resources, Yangling, 712100, China

    Sha Xue & GuoBin Liu

Authors
  1. Lie Xiao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sha Xue
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. GuoBin Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Chao Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to GuoBin Liu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Xiao, L., Xue, S., Liu, G. et al. Fractal features of soil profiles under different land use patterns on the Loess Plateau, China. J. Arid Land 6, 550–560 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40333-014-0023-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40333-014-0023-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation