Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

“Mitsurei 27”

Bern Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works, Art. 3(1)(i); Copyright Act, Sec. 6(iii), Civil Code, Sec. 709 – Chosen Yushutsu Nyusha et al. v. Nihon Telebi

  • Decision • Copyright and unfair competition law
  • Japan
  • Published:
IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law Aims and scope Submit manuscript
  1. 1.

    Where a country that is not recognised by Japan as a State (here: North Korea) has acceded to a multilateral agreement (here: the Bern Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works) already in force in Japan, such country’s accession to the agreement does not directly give rise to rights and obligations under the Agreement in relation to the country not recognised as a State, unless the obligations arising under the Agreement are considered of universal nature under general international law.

  2. 2.

    In the absence of a notification by the government concerning the accession of North Korea to the Bern Convention, nationals of North Korea do not enjoy protection of their works as foreigners of a Convention Country under Sec. 6 Copyright Act and Art. 3(1)(i) Bern Convention.

  3. 3.

    Where a work is not protected under the Japanese Copyright Act because its author is a national from a country where no obligation for protection exists (here: North Korea in relation to Japan), the use of such work without permission cannot be considered an act of tort unless there are special circumstances whereby legally protected interests are affected.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Author information

Consortia

Additional information

Translated from original by Christopher Heath.

For an article analyzing issues surrounding this case see Hisao Shiomi “Can Non-Copyrightable Works Be Protected Under Unfair Competition Law? The Japanese ‘North Korea’ Case” in this issue of IIC at doi 10.1007/s40319-014-0241-8.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Decision of the Supreme Court 8 December 2011. “Mitsurei 27”. IIC 45, 720–723 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-014-0242-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-014-0242-7

Navigation