Abstract
The goal of the present investigation is to examine students’ interest in online groupwork and the related factors in the social and cultural context of China. Using data from undergraduates from online study groups, we examined both individual- and group-level predictors for online groupwork interest. The findings indicated that online groupwork interest was positively associated with variables such as monitoring motivation, peer-oriented reasons, and previous online courses. Full-time students rated online groupwork as being more interesting. Among the group-level predictors, “learning-oriented reasons” were the only one that stood out as being statistically significant. The findings were discussed in the context of online literature, and future research is also suggested.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ainley, M. (2006). Connecting with learning: Motivation, affect and cognition in interest processes. Educational Psychology Review, 18, 391–405.
Ainley, M., Hidi, S., & Berndorff, D. (2002). Interest, learning, and the psychological processes that mediate their relationship. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 545–561.
Alexander, P. A., & Murphy, P. K. (1998). Profiling the differences in students’ knowledge, interest, and strategic processing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 435–447.
Baran, E., Correia, A., & Thompson, A. D. (2013). Tracing successful online teaching in higher education: Voices of exemplary online teachers. Teachers College Record, 115(030306), 1–41.
Chen, S., Hsu, C., & Caropreso, E. J. (2006). Cross-cultural collaborative online learning: When the west meets the east. International Journal of Technology in Teaching and Learning, 2(1), 17–35.
Chiong, R., & Jovanovic, J. (2012). Collaborative learning in online study group: An evolutionary game theory perspective. Journal of Information Technology Education, 11, 81–101.
Corno, L. (2004). Introduction to the special issue work habits and work styles: Volition in education. Teachers College Record, 106, 1669–1694.
Du, J., Zhang, K., Olinzock, A., & Adams, J. (2008). Graduate students’ perspectives on the meaningful nature of online discussions. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 19(1), 21–36.
Dunn, L., & Wallace, M. (2004). Australian academics teaching in Singapore: Striving for cultural empathy. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 41(3), 291–304.
Dutton, J., Dutton, M., & Perry, J. (2002). How do online students differ from lecture students. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 6(1), 1–20.
Dykman, C. A., & Davis, C. K. (2008). Online education forum-Part three: A quality online education experience. Journal of Information Systems Education, 19(3), 281–289.
Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41, 111–127.
Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, beahviors, institutions, and organizations across (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Hofstede, G. (2003). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. London: Profile Books.
Krapp, A. (2007). An educational-psychological conceptualisation of interest. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Guidance, 7, 5–21.
Lewis, G. S. (2010). I would have had more success if: Student reflections on their performance in online and blended courses. American Journal of Business Education, 3(11), 13–21.
Li, J. (2001). Chinese conceptualization of learning. Ethos, 29, 111–137.
Li, J. (2002). A cultural model of learning: Chinese “heart and mind for wanting to learn”. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33, 246–267.
Mittleman, D. D., Briggs, R. O., & Nunamaker, J. F, Jr. (2000). Best practice in facilitating virtual meetings: Some notes from initial experience. Group Facilitation: A Research and Applications Journal, 2, 5–14.
Newman, R. S. (2000). Social influences on the development of children’s adaptive help seeking: The role of parents, teachers, and peers. Developmental Review, 20(3), 350–404.
Newman, R. S. (2002). How self-regulated learners cope with academic difficulty: The role of adaptive help seeking. Theory into Practice, 41(2), 132–138.
Nummenmaa, M., & Nummenmaa, L. (2008). University students’ emotions, interest and activities in a web-based learning environment. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 78(1), 163–178.
Piezon, S. L., & Ferree, W. D. (2008). Perceptions of social loafing in online learning groups: A study of public university and U.S. naval war college students. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 9(2), 1–17.
Prenzel, M. (1992). The selective persistence of interest. In A. Krapp (Ed.), The role of interest in learning and development (pp. 71–98). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Rao, N., Moely, B. E., & Sachs, J. (2000). Motivational beliefs, study strategies, and mathematics attainment in high- and low-achieving Chinese secondary school students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 287–316.
Raudenbush, S., & Bryk, A. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Renninger, K. A., & Hidi, S. (2011). Revisiting the conceptualization, measurement, and generation of interest. Educational Psychologist, 46, 168–184.
Rovai, A. P. (2007). Facilitating online discussions effectively. Internet and Higher Education, 10, 77–88.
Salili, F., Zhou, H., & Hoosain, R. (2003). Adolescent education in Hong Kong and Mainland China: effects of culture and context of learning on Chinese adolescents. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.), Adolescence and education (Vol. III, pp. 277–302)., International perspectives on adolescence Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
Smith, G. G., Sorensen, C., Gump, A., Heindel, A. J., Caris, M., & Martinez, C. D. (2011). Overcoming student resistance to group work: Online versus face-to-face. Internet and Higher Education, 14, 121–128.
Sue, S., & Okazaki, S. (1990). Asian-American educational achievements. American Psychologist, 45, 913–920.
Von Secker, C. (2002). Effects of inquiry-based teacher practices on science excellence and equity. Journal of Educational Research, 95, 151–160.
Wang, D. B. (2004). Family background factors and mathematics success: A comparison of Chinese students. International Journal of Educational Research, 41, 40–54.
Xu, J. (2008a). Models of secondary students’ interest in homework: A multilevel analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 45, 1180–1205.
Xu, J. (2008b). Validation of scores on the homework management scale for high school students. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 68, 304–324.
Xu, J. (2008b). Validation of scores on the homework management scale for middle school students. Elementary School Journal, 109, 82–95.
Xu, J. (2010). Homework purpose scale for high school students: A validation study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70, 459–476.
Xu, J., & Du, J. (2013). Regulation of motivation: Students’ motivation management in online collaborative groupwork. Teachers College Record, 115(10), 1–27.
Xu, J., Du, J., & Fan, X. (2013). “Finding our time”: Predicting students’ time management in online collaborative groupwork. Computers & Education, 69, 139–147.
Zafeiriou, G., Nunes, J. M. B., & Ford, N. (2001). Using students’ perceptions of participation in collaborative learning activities in the design of online learning environments. Education for Information, 19, 83–106.
Zhu, C., Valcke, M., & Schellens, T. (2009). A cross-cultural study of online collaborative learning. Multicultural Education & Technology Journal, 3(1), 33–46.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Du, J., Fan, X. & Xu, J. Factors Related to Chinese Students’ Interest in Online Groupwork. Asia-Pacific Edu Res 25, 287–294 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-015-0261-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-015-0261-2