Abstract
Academic-managers, working at the middle tiers of university management with considerable power and authority, play an increasingly important role in the planning and execution of key university activities. Little attention has been paid to Chinese academic-managers, leaving their work at Chinese universities under-explored. This article, framed by role identity, aims to capture how academic-managers at Chinese universities perceive and internalize their management roles in a dynamic environment fraught with market-led and managerial reforms. Synthesis and analysis of qualitative data obtained through in-depth interviews, field notes, and documents reveal that the three prime role identities that are held by the academic-managers are the ‘manager’, the ‘scholar’, and the ‘bureaucrat’. Key issues that emerged from our study include the growing tensions that exist amongst the managerial, scholastic, and bureaucratic priorities of their roles. Furthermore, our collected data indicate that the perceived role identities are rooted in structural factors, including neo-liberal and new-managerial ideologies, the disciplinary community, and the officialistic culture embedded in the bureaucratic danwei tradition of Chinese universities.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agelasto, M., & Adamson, B. (1998). Higher education in post-Mao China. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
Ashforth, B. E., & Adamson, B. (2001). Role transitions in organizational life: An identity-based perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Ashforth, B. E., Harrison, S. H., & Corley, K. G. (2008). Identification in organizations: An examination of four fundamental questions. Journal of Management, 34(3), 325–374.
Barry, J., et al. (2006). Academic shape shifting: Gender, management and identities in Sweden and England. Organization, 13(2), 275–298.
Bernstein, B. (2000). Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity: Theory, search, critique. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Briggs, A. R. J. (2007). Exploring professional identities: Middle leadership in further education colleges. School Leadership and Management, 27(5), 471–485.
Burke, P. J., & Stets, J. E. (2009). Identity theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
Castells, M. (1997). The power of identity. Oxford: Blackwell.
Chinese Communist Party Central Committee. (1993).中国教育改革和发展纲要 Outline for the Reform and Development of China’s Education. Beijing: Central Committee of Chinese Communist Party.
Cho, Y. (2008). Intercoder Reliability. In P. J. Lavrakas (Ed.), Encyclopedia of survey research methods (pp. 345–346). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
Churchman, D. (2006). Institutional commitments, individual compromises: Identity-related responses to compromise in an Australian university. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 28(1), 3–15.
Clegg, S., & McAuley, J. (2005). Conceptualising middle management in higher education: A multifaceted discourse. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 27(1), 19–34.
Deem, R. (1998). New managerialism in higher education-the management of performances and cultures in universities. International Studies in the Sociology of Education, 8(1), 47–70.
Deem, R. (2004). The knowledge worker, the manager-academic and the contemporary UK university: New and old forms of public management? Financial Accountability & Management, 20(2), 107–128.
Deem, R., & Brehony, K. J. (2005). Management as ideology: The case of ‘new managerialism’ in higher education. Oxford Review of Education, 31(2), 217–235.
Deem, R., Hillyard, S., & Reed, M. (2007). Knowledge, higher education and the new managerialism: The changing management of UK universities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Floyd, A. (2012). ‘Turning points’: The personal and professional circumstances that lead academics to become middle managers. Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 40(2), 272–284.
Hancock, T. M. (2007). The business of universities and the role of the department chair. International Journal of Educational Management, 21(4), 306–314.
Henkel, M. (2000). Academic identities and policy change in higher education. London: Jessica Kingsley.
Henkel, M. (2005). Academic identity and autonomy in a changing policy environment. Higher Education, 49(1/2), 155–176.
Hwang, K. K. (2001). The deep structure of confucianism: A social psychological approach. Asia Philosophy, 11(3), 179–204.
Johnson, R., & Deem, R. (2003). Talking of students: Tensions and contradictions for the manager-academic and the university in contemporary higher education. Higher Education, 46, 289–314.
Lai, M. (2009). Challenges to the work life of academics: The experience of a renowned university in the Chinese Mainland. Higher Education Quarterly, 64(1), 89–111.
Li, L. L., Lai, M. H., & Lo, N. K. (2013). Academic work within a mode of mixed governance: Perspectives of university professors in the research context of western China. Asia Pacific Education Review, 14(3), 307–314.
Li, M., & Yang, R. (2013). Governance reforms in higher education: A study of institutional autonomy in China. In N. V. Varghese & M. Michaela (Eds.), Governance reforms in higher education in Asia (pp. 69–85). Paris: International Institute for Educational Planning, UNESCO.
Macfarlane, B. (2011). Professors as intellectual leaders: Formation, identity and role. Studies in Higher Education, 36(1), 57–73.
Marginson, S. (2000). Rethinking academic work in the global era. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 22(1), 23–35.
McCall, G. J., & Simmons, J. L. (1978). Identities and interaction. New York: Free Press.
Merriam, S. (1998). Qualitative research and case study application in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Meyer, R. E., & Hammerschmid, G. (2006). Changing institutional logics and executive identities: A managerial challenge to public administration in Austria. American Behavioral Scientist, 49(7), 1000–1014.
Mok, K. H. (1996). Marketization and decentralization: Development of education and paradigm shift in social policy. Hong Kong Public Administration, 5(1), 35–56.
Mok, K. H., & Wang, Li. (2007). The impacts of neo-liberalism on higher education in China. The Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies, 5(1), 316–348.
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications Inc.
Rose, N. (1999). The powers of freedom: Reframing political thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Smith, R. (2002). The role of the university head of department: A survey of two British universities. Educational Management and Administration, 30(3), 293–312.
Smith, R. (2005). Departmental leadership and management in chartered and statutory universities: A case of diversity. Educational Management and Administration, 33(4), 449–464.
Stets, J. E., & Burke, P. J. (2000). Identity theory and social identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63(3), 224–237.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Stryker, S. (2002). Symbolic interactionism: A social structural version. Caldwell, NJ: Blackburn Press.
Tapper, T., & Palfreyman, D. (2010). The collegial tradition in the age of mass higher education. Dordrecht: Springer Science+Business Media B. V.
Thomas- Gregory, A. (2014). Professional identities of middle managers: A case study in the faculty of health and social care. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 42(5), 620–639.
Todnem By, R., Diefenbach, T., & Klarner, P. (2008). Getting organisational change right in public services: The case of European Higher Education. Journal of Change Management, Special Issue: Managing organisational change in public services, 8(1), 21–35.
Turner, J. H. (2013). Contemporary sociological theory. New Delhi: Sage publications Inc.
Waitere, H. J., Wright, J., Tremaine, M., Brown, S., & Pausé, C. J. (2011). Choosing whether or resist or reinforce the new managerialism: The impact of performance-based research funding on academic identity. Higher Education, 30(2), 205–217.
Yang, R., Vidovich, L., & Currie, J. (2007). “Dancing in a cage” : Changing autonomy in Chinese higher education. Higher Education, 54(4), 575–592.
Ylijoki, O. H., & Ursin, J. (2013). The construction of academic identity in the changes of finnish higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 38(8), 1135–1149.
Yu, K. P. (2013). 什么造就了中国的官本位文化?What are the reasons of Chinese officialistic culture. Social Science, 6, 1–4.
Zhao, J. M. (2006). 精英主义与单位制度:对中国大学组织与管理的案例研究. Institutionalized elitism and danwei system: An ethnographic study of organization and management of a Chinese key university. Peking University Education Review, 1, 173–191.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Huang, YT., Pang, Sk. The Role Identities of University Academic-Managers in a Changing Environment: A Chinese Perspective. Asia-Pacific Edu Res 25, 185–194 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-015-0248-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-015-0248-z