Skip to main content
Log in

The Role Identities of University Academic-Managers in a Changing Environment: A Chinese Perspective

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Academic-managers, working at the middle tiers of university management with considerable power and authority, play an increasingly important role in the planning and execution of key university activities. Little attention has been paid to Chinese academic-managers, leaving their work at Chinese universities under-explored. This article, framed by role identity, aims to capture how academic-managers at Chinese universities perceive and internalize their management roles in a dynamic environment fraught with market-led and managerial reforms. Synthesis and analysis of qualitative data obtained through in-depth interviews, field notes, and documents reveal that the three prime role identities that are held by the academic-managers are the ‘manager’, the ‘scholar’, and the ‘bureaucrat’. Key issues that emerged from our study include the growing tensions that exist amongst the managerial, scholastic, and bureaucratic priorities of their roles. Furthermore, our collected data indicate that the perceived role identities are rooted in structural factors, including neo-liberal and new-managerial ideologies, the disciplinary community, and the officialistic culture embedded in the bureaucratic danwei tradition of Chinese universities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agelasto, M., & Adamson, B. (1998). Higher education in post-Mao China. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashforth, B. E., & Adamson, B. (2001). Role transitions in organizational life: An identity-based perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashforth, B. E., Harrison, S. H., & Corley, K. G. (2008). Identification in organizations: An examination of four fundamental questions. Journal of Management, 34(3), 325–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barry, J., et al. (2006). Academic shape shifting: Gender, management and identities in Sweden and England. Organization, 13(2), 275–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, B. (2000). Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity: Theory, search, critique. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briggs, A. R. J. (2007). Exploring professional identities: Middle leadership in further education colleges. School Leadership and Management, 27(5), 471–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke, P. J., & Stets, J. E. (2009). Identity theory. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (1997). The power of identity. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chinese Communist Party Central Committee. (1993).中国教育改革和发展纲要 Outline for the Reform and Development of China’s Education. Beijing: Central Committee of Chinese Communist Party.

  • Cho, Y. (2008). Intercoder Reliability. In P. J. Lavrakas (Ed.), Encyclopedia of survey research methods (pp. 345–346). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchman, D. (2006). Institutional commitments, individual compromises: Identity-related responses to compromise in an Australian university. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 28(1), 3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clegg, S., & McAuley, J. (2005). Conceptualising middle management in higher education: A multifaceted discourse. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 27(1), 19–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deem, R. (1998). New managerialism in higher education-the management of performances and cultures in universities. International Studies in the Sociology of Education, 8(1), 47–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deem, R. (2004). The knowledge worker, the manager-academic and the contemporary UK university: New and old forms of public management? Financial Accountability & Management, 20(2), 107–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deem, R., & Brehony, K. J. (2005). Management as ideology: The case of ‘new managerialism’ in higher education. Oxford Review of Education, 31(2), 217–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deem, R., Hillyard, S., & Reed, M. (2007). Knowledge, higher education and the new managerialism: The changing management of UK universities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Floyd, A. (2012). ‘Turning points’: The personal and professional circumstances that lead academics to become middle managers. Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 40(2), 272–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hancock, T. M. (2007). The business of universities and the role of the department chair. International Journal of Educational Management, 21(4), 306–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henkel, M. (2000). Academic identities and policy change in higher education. London: Jessica Kingsley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henkel, M. (2005). Academic identity and autonomy in a changing policy environment. Higher Education, 49(1/2), 155–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, K. K. (2001). The deep structure of confucianism: A social psychological approach. Asia Philosophy, 11(3), 179–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R., & Deem, R. (2003). Talking of students: Tensions and contradictions for the manager-academic and the university in contemporary higher education. Higher Education, 46, 289–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lai, M. (2009). Challenges to the work life of academics: The experience of a renowned university in the Chinese Mainland. Higher Education Quarterly, 64(1), 89–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, L. L., Lai, M. H., & Lo, N. K. (2013). Academic work within a mode of mixed governance: Perspectives of university professors in the research context of western China. Asia Pacific Education Review, 14(3), 307–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, M., & Yang, R. (2013). Governance reforms in higher education: A study of institutional autonomy in China. In N. V. Varghese & M. Michaela (Eds.), Governance reforms in higher education in Asia (pp. 69–85). Paris: International Institute for Educational Planning, UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macfarlane, B. (2011). Professors as intellectual leaders: Formation, identity and role. Studies in Higher Education, 36(1), 57–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marginson, S. (2000). Rethinking academic work in the global era. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 22(1), 23–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCall, G. J., & Simmons, J. L. (1978). Identities and interaction. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merriam, S. (1998). Qualitative research and case study application in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, R. E., & Hammerschmid, G. (2006). Changing institutional logics and executive identities: A managerial challenge to public administration in Austria. American Behavioral Scientist, 49(7), 1000–1014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mok, K. H. (1996). Marketization and decentralization: Development of education and paradigm shift in social policy. Hong Kong Public Administration, 5(1), 35–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mok, K. H., & Wang, Li. (2007). The impacts of neo-liberalism on higher education in China. The Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies, 5(1), 316–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N. (1999). The powers of freedom: Reframing political thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. (2002). The role of the university head of department: A survey of two British universities. Educational Management and Administration, 30(3), 293–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. (2005). Departmental leadership and management in chartered and statutory universities: A case of diversity. Educational Management and Administration, 33(4), 449–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stets, J. E., & Burke, P. J. (2000). Identity theory and social identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63(3), 224–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stryker, S. (2002). Symbolic interactionism: A social structural version. Caldwell, NJ: Blackburn Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tapper, T., & Palfreyman, D. (2010). The collegial tradition in the age of mass higher education. Dordrecht: Springer Science+Business Media B. V.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas- Gregory, A. (2014). Professional identities of middle managers: A case study in the faculty of health and social care. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 42(5), 620–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Todnem By, R., Diefenbach, T., & Klarner, P. (2008). Getting organisational change right in public services: The case of European Higher Education. Journal of Change Management, Special Issue: Managing organisational change in public services, 8(1), 21–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. H. (2013). Contemporary sociological theory. New Delhi: Sage publications Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waitere, H. J., Wright, J., Tremaine, M., Brown, S., & Pausé, C. J. (2011). Choosing whether or resist or reinforce the new managerialism: The impact of performance-based research funding on academic identity. Higher Education, 30(2), 205–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, R., Vidovich, L., & Currie, J. (2007). “Dancing in a cage” : Changing autonomy in Chinese higher education. Higher Education, 54(4), 575–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ylijoki, O. H., & Ursin, J. (2013). The construction of academic identity in the changes of finnish higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 38(8), 1135–1149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, K. P. (2013). 什么造就了中国的官本位文化?What are the reasons of Chinese officialistic culture. Social Science, 6, 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, J. M. (2006). 精英主义与单位制度:对中国大学组织与管理的案例研究. Institutionalized elitism and danwei system: An ethnographic study of organization and management of a Chinese key university. Peking University Education Review, 1, 173–191.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ya-Ting Huang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huang, YT., Pang, Sk. The Role Identities of University Academic-Managers in a Changing Environment: A Chinese Perspective. Asia-Pacific Edu Res 25, 185–194 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-015-0248-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-015-0248-z

Keywords

Navigation