Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Trajectory Design for Improving Observability of Angles-Only Relative Navigation between Two Satellites

  • Published:
The Journal of the Astronautical Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study focuses on designing a relative rendezvous trajectory for angles-only navigation between two satellites. The main purpose of this paper is to design a rendezvous trajectory which provides better observability for the whole mission period. The second purpose is to improve fuel consumption efficiency. For the trade-off between the observability maneuver and fuel consumption, it is important to minimize the fuel consumption while ensuring sufficient observability since a small-size satellite has a tight mass budget. To design such a trajectory, this study proposes implementing the observability constraint at each optimization node. Then the cost function is aimed at minimizing fuel consumption. A numerical optimization technique is implemented to solve the optimization problem. Simulation for the estimator is performed to verify the designed trajectory. To get physical insight into the relationship between relative trajectory and observability, an observability analysis is also presented using a geometrical relationship between two satellites and the Fisher information matrix as a measure of observability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Milan, M.B., Petit, N., Murray, R.M.: Constrained trajectory generation for micro-satellite formation flying. AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit (2001)

  2. Beichman, C., et al.: Status of the terrestrial planet finder interferometer (TPF-I). Proc. SPIE 6268, 62680–S1 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Fridlund, C. V. M.: Darwin-the infrared space interferometry mission. ESA Bull. 103 (2000)

  4. Saenz-Otero, A., Miller, D.W.: SPHERES: a platform for formation-flight research. Proc. SPIE 5899, 230–240 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Persson, S, et al: PRISMA–an autonomous formation flying mission. Small Satellite Systems and Services Symposium. Chia Laguna (2006)

  6. Walker, R., et al: SIMONE: Interplanetary microsatellites for NEO rendezvous missions. In: 17th Annual AIAA/USU Conference on Small Satellites (2003)

  7. Kelsey, J.M., Byrne, J., Cosgrove, M., Seereeram, S., Mehra, R.K.: Vision-based relative pose estimation for autonomous rendezvous and docking. In: Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE Aerospace Conference. Montana (2006)

  8. Fehse, W.: Automated Rendezvous and Docking of Spacecraft. Cambridge University Press (2003)

  9. Woffinden, D.C., Geller, D.K.: Optimal orbital rendezvous maneuvering for angles-only navigation. J. Guid. Control Dyn. 32, 1382–1387 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Woffinden, D.C., Geller, D.K.: Relative angles-only navigation and pose estimation for autonomous orbital rendezvous. J. Guid. Control Dyn 30, 1455–1469 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Schmidt, J., Geller, D., Chavez, F.: Improving angles-only navigation performance by selecting sufficiently accurate accelerometers. In: 23rd annual AIAA/USU conference on small satellites (2009)

  12. Chari, R.J.V.: Autonomous orbital rendezvous using angles-only navigation. In: MIT Master of Science in Aeronautics and Astronautics (2001)

  13. Spurmann, J.: Spiraling approach for angles-only navigation within on-orbit servicing missions. In: EuroGNC Conference (2011)

  14. Bar-Shalom, Y., Li, X., Kirubarajan, T.: Estimation with Applications to Tracking and Navigation, Theory Algorithms and Software, 109–110 (2001)

  15. Ponda, S.S., Kolacinski, R.M., Frazzoli, E.: Trajectory optimization for target localization using small unmanned aerial vehicles. In: AIAA GNC Conference (2009)

  16. Betts, J.T.: Survey of numerical methods for trajectory optimization. J. Guid. Control Dyn 21, 193–207 (1998)

  17. Ranieri, C.L., Ocampo, C.A.: Indirect optimization of three-dimensional finite-burning interplanetary transfers including spiral dynamics. J. Guid. Control Dyn 32, 444–454 (2009)

  18. Lee, D., Bang, H., Kim, H.-D.: Optimal earth-moon trajectory design using new initial costate estimation method. J. Guid. Control Dyn 35, 1671–1676 (2012)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Aerospace Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon, South Korea

    Jaehwan Pi & Hyochoong Bang

Authors
  1. Jaehwan Pi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hyochoong Bang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jaehwan Pi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pi, J., Bang, H. Trajectory Design for Improving Observability of Angles-Only Relative Navigation between Two Satellites. J of Astronaut Sci 61, 391–412 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40295-014-0016-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40295-014-0016-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation