Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Dose-Response Relationships of Balance Training in Healthy Young Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

  • Systematic Review
  • Published:
Sports Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 08 February 2016

Abstract

Background

Balance training (BT) has been used for the promotion of balance and sports-related skills as well as for prevention and rehabilitation of lower extremity sport injuries. However, evidence-based dose-response relationships in BT parameters have not yet been established.

Objective

The objective of this systematic literature review and meta-analysis was to determine dose-response relationships in BT parameters that lead to improvements in balance in young healthy adults with different training status.

Data Sources

A computerized systematic literature search was performed in the electronic databases PubMed, Web of Knowledge, and SPORTDiscus from January 1984 up to May 2014 to capture all articles related to BT in young healthy adults.

Study Eligibility Criteria

A systematic approach was used to evaluate the 596 articles identified for initial review. Only randomized controlled studies were included if they investigated BT in young healthy adults (16–40 years) and tested at least one behavioral balance performance outcome. In total, 25 studies met the inclusion criteria for review.

Study Appraisal and Synthesis Methods

Studies were evaluated using the physiotherapy evidence database (PEDro) scale. Within-subject effect sizes (ESdw) and between-subject effect sizes (ESdb) were calculated. The included studies were coded for the following criteria: training status (elite athletes, sub-elite athletes, recreational athletes, untrained subjects), training modalities (training period, frequency, volume, etc.), and balance outcome (test for the assessment of steady-state, proactive, and reactive balance).

Results

Mean ESdb demonstrated that BT is an effective means to improve steady-state (ESdb = 0.73) and proactive balance (ESdb = 0.92) in healthy young adults. Studies including elite athletes showed the largest effects (ESdb = 1.29) on measures of steady-state balance as compared with studies analyzing sub-elite athletes (ESdb = 0.32), recreational athletes (ESdb = 0.69), and untrained subjects (ESdb = 0.82). Our analyses regarding dose-response relationships in BT revealed that a training period of 11–12 weeks (ESdb = 1.09), a training frequency of three (mean ESdb = 0.72) or six (single ESdb = 1.84) sessions per week, at least 16–19 training sessions in total (ESdb = 1.12), a duration of 11–15 min for a single training session (ESdb = 1.11), four exercises per training session (ESdb = 1.29), two sets per exercise (ESdb = 1.63), and a duration of 21–40 s for a single BT exercise (ESdb = 1.06) is most effective in improving measures of steady-state balance. Due to a small number of studies, dose-response relationships of BT for measures of proactive and reactive balance could not be qualified.

Limitations

The present findings must be interpreted with caution because it is difficult to separate the impact of a single training modality (e.g., training frequency) from that of the others. Moreover, the quality of the included studies was rather limited, with a mean PEDro score of 5.

Conclusions

Our detailed analyses revealed effective BT parameters for the improvement of steady-state balance. Thus, practitioners and coaches are advised to consult the identified dose-response relationships of this systematic literature review and meta-analysis to implement effective BT protocols in clinical and sports-related contexts. However, further research of high methodological quality is needed to (1) determine dose-response relationships of BT for measures of proactive and reactive balance, (2) define effective sequencing protocols in BT (e.g., BT before or after a regular training session), (3) discern the effects of detraining, and (4) develop a feasible and effective method to regulate training intensity in BT.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zech A, Hubscher M, Vogt L, Banzer W, Hansel F, Pfeifer K. Balance training for neuromuscular control and performance enhancement: a systematic review. J Athl Train. 2010;45(4):392–403.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hübscher M, Zech A, Pfeifer K, Hansel F, Vogt L, Banzer W. Neuromuscular training for sports injury prevention: a systematic review. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010;42(3):413–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Zech A, Hubscher M, Vogt L, Banzer W, Hansel F, Pfeifer K. Neuromuscular training for rehabilitation of sports injuries: a systematic review. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009;41(10):1831–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Taube W, Gruber M, Gollhofer A. Spinal and supraspinal adaptations associated with balance training and their functional relevance. Acta Physiol. 2008;193(2):101–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Taube W, Gruber M, Beck S, Faist M, Gollhofer A, Schubert M. Cortical and spinal adaptations induced by balance training: correlation between stance stability and corticospinal activation. Acta Physiol. 2007;189(4):347–58.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Granacher U, Gollhofer A, Kriemler S. Effects of balance training on postural sway, leg extensor strength, and jumping height in adolescents. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2010;81(3):245–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rasool SI, George K. The impact of single-leg dynamic balance training on dynamic stability. Phys Ther Sport. 2007;8(4):177–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Oliveira AS, Brito Silva P, Farina D, Kersting UG. Unilateral balance training enhances neuromuscular reactions to perturbations in the trained and contralateral limb. Gait Posture. 2013;38(4):894–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hoffmann J. Physiological aspects of sport training and performance. Champaign: Human Kinetics Pub Inc; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  10. DiStefano LJ, Clark MA, Padua DA. Evidence supporting balance training in healthy individuals: a systemic review. J Strength Cond Res. 2009;23(9):2718–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Farlie MK, Robins L, Keating JL, Elizabeth M, Haines TP. Intensity of challenge to the balance system is not reported in the prescription of balance exercises in randomised trials: a systematic review. J Physiother. 2013;59(4):227–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Shumway-Cook A, Woollacott MH. Motor control: translating research into clinical practice. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lesinski M, Muehlbauer T, Busch D, Granacher U. Effects of complex training on strength and speed performance in athletes: a systematic review. Sportverletz Sportschaden. 2014;28(2):85–107.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Maher CG, Sherrington C, Herbert RD, Moseley AM, Elkins M. Reliability of the PEDro scale for rating quality of randomized controlled trials. Phys Ther. 2003;83(8):713–21.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cohen J. Statistical power for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale: Erlbaum; 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hrysomallis C. Balance ability and athletic performance. Sports Med. 2011;41(3):221–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. France EP, Derscheid G, Irragang J, Malone T, Petersen R, Tippett S, Wilk K. Preliminary clinical evaluation of the Breg KAT: effects of training in normals. Isokinet Exerc Sci. 1992;2(3):133–9.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gruber M, Taube W, Gollhofer A, Beck S, Amtage F, Schubert M. Training-specific adaptations of H- and stretch reflexes in human soleus muscle. J Mot Behav. 2007;39(1):68–78.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Cox ED, Lephart SM, Irrgang JJ. Unilateral balance training of noninjured individuals and the effects on postural sway. J Sport Rehabil. 1993;2:87–96.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Verhagen E, Bobbert M, Inklaar M, van Kalken M, van der Beek A, Bouter L, van Mechelen W. The effect of a balance training programme on centre of pressure excursion in one-leg stance. J Biomech. 2005;20(10):1094–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gioftsidou A, Malliou P, Pafis G, Beneka A, Godolias G, Maganaris CN. The effects of soccer training and timing of balance training on balance ability. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2006;96(6):659–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Gioftsidou A, Malliou P, Pafis G, Beneka A, Tsapralis K, Sofokleous P, et al. Balance training programs for soccer injuries prevention. J Hum Sport Exerc. 2012;7(3):639–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Malliou P, Gioftsidou A, Pafis G, Beneka A, Godolias G. Proprioceptive training (balance exercises) reduces lower extremity injuries in young soccer players. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2004;17(3):101–4.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Malliou P, Amoutzas K, Theodosiou A, Gioftsidou A, Mantis K, Pylianidis T, Kioumourtzoglou E. Proprioceptive training for learning downhill skiing. Percept Mot Skills. 2004;99(1):149–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Romero-Franco N, Martinez-Lopez E, Lomas-Vega R, Hita-Contreras F, Martinez-Amat A. Effects of proprioceptive training program on core stability and center of gravity control in sprinters. J Strength Cond Res. 2012;26(8):2071–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Hoffman M, Payne VG. The effects of proprioceptive ankle disk training on healthy subjects. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1995;21(2):90–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Soderman K, Werner S, Pietila T, Engstrom B, Alfredson H. Balance board training: prevention of traumatic injuries of the lower extremities in female soccer players? A prospective randomized intervention study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2000;8(6):356–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Chong RK, Ambrose A, Carzoli J, Hardison L, Jacobson B. Source of improvement in balance control after a training program for ankle proprioception. Percept Mot Skills. 2001;92(1):265–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Sforza C, Grassi GP, Turci M, Fragnito N, Pizzini G, Ferrario VF. Influence of training on maintenance of equilibrium on a tilting platform. Percept Mot Skills. 2003;96(1):127–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Riemann BL, Tray NC, Lephart SM. Unilateral multiaxial coordination training and ankle kinesthesia, muscle strength, and postural control. J Sport Rehabil. 2003;12(1):13–30.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Bruhn S, Kullmann N, Gollhofer A. The effects of a sensorimotor training and a strength training on postural stabilisation, maximum isometric contraction and jump performance. Int J Sports Med. 2004;25(1):56–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Kovacs EJ, Birmingham TB, Forwell L, Litchfield RB. Effect of training on postural control in figure skaters: a randomized controlled trial of neuromuscular versus basic off-ice training programs. Clin J Sport Med. 2004;14(4):215–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Rothermel A, Hale SA, Hertel J, Denegar CR. Effect of active foot positioning on the outcome of a balance training program. Phys Ther Sport. 2004;5(2):98–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Emery CA, Cassidy JD, Klassen TP, Rosychuk RJ, Rowe BH. Effectiveness of a home-based balance-training program in reducing sports-related injuries among healthy adolescents: a cluster randomized controlled trial. CMAJ. 2005;172(6):749–54.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Kean CO, Behm DG, Young WB. Fixed foot balance training increases rectus femoris activation during landing and jump height in recreationally active women. J Sports Sci Med. 2006;5(1):138–48.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Yaggie JA, Campbell BM. Effects of balance training on selected skills. J Strength Cond Res. 2006;20(2):422–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Eisen TC, Danoff JV, Leone JE, Miller TA. The effects of multiaxial and uniaxial unstable surface balance training in college athletes. J Strength Cond Res. 2010;24(7):1740–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Yarrow K, Brown P, Krakauer JW. Inside the brain of an elite athlete: the neural processes that support high achievement in sports. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009;10(8):585–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Nakata H, Yoshie M, Miura A, Kudo K. Characteristics of the athletes’ brain: evidence from neurophysiology and neuroimaging. Brain Res Rev. 2010;62(2):197–211.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Taube W, Gollhofer A. Control and training of posture and balance. In: Komi PV, editor. Neuromuscular spects of sport performance. Chichester: Blackwell; 2011. p. 254–69.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Malliou VJ, Malliou P, Gioftsidou A, Pafis G, Katsikas CA, Beneka A, Tsiganos G, Godolias G. Balance exercise program before or after a tennis training session? J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2008;21(2):87–90.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Muehlbauer T, Gollhofer A, Granacher U. Association of balance, strength, and power measures in young adults. J Strength Cond Res. 2013;27(3):582–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Muehlbauer T, Gollhofer A, Granacher U. Relationship between measures of balance and strength in middle-aged adults. J Strength Cond Res. 2012;26(9):2401–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Muehlbauer T, Besemer C, Wehrle A, Gollhofer A, Granacher U. Relationship between strength, power and balance performance in seniors. Gerontology. 2012;58(6):504–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Zemkova E. Sport-specific balance. Sports Med. 2014;44(5):579–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Muehlbauer T, Roth R, Bopp M, Granacher U. An exercise sequence for progression in balance training. J Strength Cond Res. 2012;26(2):568–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

No financial support was received for the conduct of this study or preparation of this manuscript. Melanie Lesinski, Tibor Hortobágyi, Thomas Muehlbauer, Albert Gollhofer, and Urs Granacher declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Training and Movement Sciences, University of Potsdam, Research Focus Cognition Sciences, Am Neuen Palais 10, House 12, 14469, Potsdam, Germany

    Melanie Lesinski, Thomas Muehlbauer & Urs Granacher

  2. Centre for Human Movement Sciences, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands

    Tibor Hortobágyi

  3. Institute of Sport and Sport Science, Albert-Ludwigs-University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany

    Albert Gollhofer

Authors
  1. Melanie Lesinski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tibor Hortobágyi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Thomas Muehlbauer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Albert Gollhofer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Urs Granacher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Urs Granacher.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lesinski, M., Hortobágyi, T., Muehlbauer, T. et al. Dose-Response Relationships of Balance Training in Healthy Young Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Sports Med 45, 557–576 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-014-0284-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-014-0284-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation