Skip to main content
Log in

Most cost-effective method to monitor ART in adults in Africa?

  • Clinical study
  • Published:
PharmacoEconomics & Outcomes News

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, UK

  2. Joint Clinical Research Centre, Kampala, Uganda

References

  1. Keebler D, et al. Cost-effectiveness of different strategies to monitor adults on antiretroviral treatment: a combined analysis of three mathematical models. The Lancet Global Health : 10 Dec 2013. Available from: URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(13)70048-2.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gibb DM, et al. Sustainable and cost-effective monitoring of patients on ART The Lancet Global Health : 10 Dec 2013. Available from: URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(13)70081-0.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Most cost-effective method to monitor ART in adults in Africa?. PharmacoEcon Outcomes News 694, 6 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40274-014-0968-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40274-014-0968-y

Navigation